한국 농촌다움 개념 연구 - 농촌다움과 농촌성 연구 비교 중심으로 - (A Study on the Concept of Korean Ruralism - Focusing on the Comparison of Research on Ruralism and Rurality in Korea-)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국농촌계획학회
· 수록지 정보 : 농촌계획 / 27권 / 3호 / 69 ~ 84페이지
· 저자명 : 이동윤, 손용훈

초록

This study aims to understand the concept of ‘ruralism’ in Korea by comparing with ‘rurality’ which were dealt with in various fields related to rural areas in Korea. This study conducted a systematic literature review as a methodology. The process is defining key questions, searching for documents, classifying documents, extracting data, and presenting results. The key questions were set to ‘How has the term ‘ruralism’ been used in various studies?’ and ‘How can the concept of rurality in Korea be organized?’ according to the purpose of the study. The study retrieved literature by searching on Korean academic database, RISS and DBpia, using the five keywords ‘농촌성’, ‘농촌다움’, ‘농촌다운’, ‘Rurality,’ and ‘Ruralism.’ The search yielded 1,014 documents which were thereafter screened by systematic literature review process. After sifting, only 31 publications were found suitable for inclusion in the final analysis. This study organized them into four categories: rural concept, rural landscape, rural tourism, and rural development. The literature divided into four types. Type I is a study that deals only with economy⋅society among studies related to rurality, Type II is a study that deals with both the economic⋅social and physical environment, Type III is a study that deals with the physical environment of a rural area and presents the rural planning principle as maintenance and preservation. Finally, Type IV is a study that presents ruralism as a new rural planning principle for a future rural area. In the end, the study discussed some implications on defining ruralism in Korea.

영어초록

This study aims to understand the concept of ‘ruralism’ in Korea by comparing with ‘rurality’ which were dealt with in various fields related to rural areas in Korea. This study conducted a systematic literature review as a methodology. The process is defining key questions, searching for documents, classifying documents, extracting data, and presenting results. The key questions were set to ‘How has the term ‘ruralism’ been used in various studies?’ and ‘How can the concept of rurality in Korea be organized?’ according to the purpose of the study. The study retrieved literature by searching on Korean academic database, RISS and DBpia, using the five keywords ‘농촌성’, ‘농촌다움’, ‘농촌다운’, ‘Rurality,’ and ‘Ruralism.’ The search yielded 1,014 documents which were thereafter screened by systematic literature review process. After sifting, only 31 publications were found suitable for inclusion in the final analysis. This study organized them into four categories: rural concept, rural landscape, rural tourism, and rural development. The literature divided into four types. Type I is a study that deals only with economy⋅society among studies related to rurality, Type II is a study that deals with both the economic⋅social and physical environment, Type III is a study that deals with the physical environment of a rural area and presents the rural planning principle as maintenance and preservation. Finally, Type IV is a study that presents ruralism as a new rural planning principle for a future rural area. In the end, the study discussed some implications on defining ruralism in Korea.

참고자료

· 없음