*문* 스토어

*문*

개인

팔로워0 팔로우

소개

등록된 소개글이 없습니다.

전문분야 등록된 전문분야가 없습니다.

판매자 정보

학교정보

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

직장정보

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

자격증

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

판매지수

판매중 자료수

9개
전체 판매량

36개
최근 3개월 판매량

0개
자료후기 점수

평균A
자료문의 응답률

-

전체자료 9개

[영문학]`Gimpel The Fool` 을 읽고 (영작 감상문)

After reading this short novel, I intend to imagine that I become a person who is like Gimpel. Exactly speaking, Gimpel is a person who I have wanted to meet. Although he is called a fool, I like such a foolishness. I think it should brings me warmth of humanity. So If Gimpel exists in real world, I want to be his friend. But in real world, it is not easy to be the fool like him or to exist like him. He has a simple, plain and uncomplicated attitude about all things and he is very gullible because he believes everything he heard. So people is easy to tease him. They often play tricks of him with a very simple mind. His job is a baker, and people would come to his store and tell him that the Messiah had come, that the Messiah was in his house, to please rush to his house, that the Messiah was there. Certainly if common person hear this, he doesn`t easily believe them. In fact everyone couldn`t believe easily things although it is true fact. But unlike normal man, Gimpel would leave the store open and go there. After he does, he only meets that people were laughing at him as he would return to his bakery. It is a funny and ludicrous scene.

독후감/창작| 2006.06.19| 2페이지| 2,000원| 조회(578)

영작, Gimpel, the fool, Gimpel the Fool

미리보기

닫기
[영작감상문]The Gentleman From Cracow

This story tells us a fantastical legend of the village of Frampol. The village of Frampol follows the Jewish laws and practices differ from other normal village. So they think separating between Jews and Gentiles. One day a gentleman from Cracow comes to the village of Frampol. The villagers are impoverished and suffering from severe drought. On the contrary poverty of the villagers this gentleman has unimaginable property. Seeing his rich appearance inhabitants of Frampol surely, considered the rich man as their savior and village`s good fortune. I think that they are already dazzled by his riches. I couldn`t see this people in this story as completely religious people. They surely try to keep from doing sin but they tend to act by materialism. They tend to prefer having money to considering their soul. Originally Jews believe that only Jews can go paradise and if Jews have a sin can`t go there. So they have to keep the law which was given by God. So they have to think that their souls having no sin are important than their physical desire. But they don`t do so in this story. They also marry for money. One of the Jewish customs is a dowry that money or property brought by a bride to her husband at marriage.

독후감/창작| 2006.06.19| 2페이지| 2,500원| 조회(247)

cracow, gentleman, the gentleman from c, th..

미리보기

닫기
[영문학]` The Fly `을 읽고 (영작감상문

This novel makes me think about the fact that human is mortal. It is a universal fact. but everyone want to deny that fact like the boss who is this novel`s main character. his son only appears in old picture because he died six years ago. It had been a terrible shock to the boss. The boss gets seeing accidentally that the fly falls to the ink pot. On testing, He observes whether the fly can survive or die. At first,Mr.Woodifield is a main character. I think about intention of Woodifield`s appearance. Mr.Woodifield strock of apoplexy .So he seems to be near the death.He lets the boss meditate on his son`s death. But the boss doesn`t receive Mr.mansfield with a haughty style, he receive the visitor in sympathy. I receive a good impression to him. I think it is one of the novelist`s intentions.

독후감/창작| 2006.06.19| 3페이지| 2,000원| 조회(1,106)

감상문, 영작, fly, the fly

미리보기

닫기
[영작감상문]You touched me

I had thought that love comes in unconscious state. After seeing Hadrian, I consider how sensible touch important to love each other. Before 2 years, I had read touch gives occasion to good impression to human in a journal. Hadrian feels strangely love to his sister in law against gap of the age- her sister 10 year older than him, her appearance-not beautiful and class organization. I think he loves her in veracity after emotional radically change by touching because it is written in p344 that he doesn`t want her for the money. I take this fact that love comes first emotional not physical. Touch bring into emotional change about Matilda. In my experience, I couldn`t keep physical love for a long time. I think it`s not love but just good feeling. It seems, in this novel, that the money plays leading part in everything. that is, They are ruled materialistic thinking. I think love hasn`t relation deeply to money. But it is different some to characters in this novel. They are probably controlled by money. Hadrian think he could not do with Matilda, without the money. If Matilda has no money, does Hadrian want to marry her? I think its answer is "NO" . In reality, If I fall in love with someone, I couldn`t receive him my husband.

독후감/창작| 2006.06.19| 2페이지| 2,000원| 조회(852)

you touched me, me, you, touched, you touche..

미리보기

닫기
[영문학]Shooting an elephant 감상문 (영작)

Shooting an ElephantSometimes I would see that child do a cruel thing. They kill many ants cruelly. Why so?There were too many whys a man's life. but I think people is born with evil nature. One of the evil nature appears to me that feeling good about breaking a weak being. In this novel, English is cruel to weak Indian. The writer is an Indian. but he's job is affiliated with Engilh. He isplaced in a delicate position. When the elephant happening occur, he get a better glimpse about imperialism and understanding about the leader of English. Because he has a riffle . I think It stands for the privilege of ruler. He isn't of a mind to kill the harmless elephant at that time. but after he look at the native faces all happy and excited over that the elephant is going to be shot, he shoots the elephant with the riffle feeling the native is like the English.As he expect The crowd is very glad that in shooting an elephant. I can read evil natures of men and I try to understand imperialism as writer do. but I can't do that.What is happened If this writer might not shoot the elephant? If I stood in that situation with a gun , I never shot the elephant. because I know who really a fool is. Although the elephant kills the coolie ,the writer don't in the least want to shoot peacefully eating an elephant.I think it is important than the other's wants to..and I'll be the target of criticism.But I never regret doing so. Contrary to the writer I believe if one person do something, It is not because he is "must", but because he is "willing". Well, and I don't want to understand acts of English leader who is oppressor to people in weak nation cruelly. There's one other point which claims our attention. Imperialism is a word of Latin origin-it means imperator and imperium. in this novel .It is not from intention of imperator but from potential intention of the English. One of victim of imperialism is Indian. They yell painful with oppress from English. Simultaneously they fell into contradictory victim by want to see killing an elephant which can be avoided. while Elephant is killing they enjoy it and support him to kill the animal . The writer realize who this terrorem theoretic name "imperialism" intend for. This fact is perplex me.then, I also know no longer only leader is evil but The follower makes leader.제국주의가 불합리하다고 생각하면서도 제국주의에 반하면서 자기를 곤란하게 하는 자국민들도 싫어하는 중간적 위치에 선 주인공... 그는 자신이 종사하는 제국주의가 싫으면서도 부디스트프리스트의 것츠를 ~ 하는게 세상에서 가장큰 기쁨이라 말한다. 그렇게 갈등적으로 있던 주인공은 코끼리 사건으로 영국을 이해하게 된다. 제국주의라는 말의 어원은 라틴어의황제 imperator, 제국 imperium 인데, 영국의 인도 식민지화는 앞부분에 묘사된 것같이 험악하게 탄압한다.인도인들은 영국보다 강하지 못한 약한 나라인데 영국인들은 심하게 짓밟는 것이다. 그 부분에서 코끼리가 아무 해도 없이 평화롭게 풀을 뜯어먹고 있는데 악한 쾌락을 위해 주인공을 쏘게 만든 인도인들이 모순적으로 영국인의 입장이 되는 것이다. 주인공은 자신의 의지와는 상관없이 쏴야만 하는 상황에 처한다. 꼭두각시처럼 행동하는 것이다. 그들의 기대를 저버릴 수 없는 상황이고 자신을 따르며 여기까지 왔는 데 그냥 돌아갈 수 없기 때문이다. 주인공은 여기에서 코끼리를 기대대로 쏘았고 비웃음을 당하지 않았다. 또 코끼리가 한 노동자를 죽였으므로 합법적이 되었다. 영국의 황제가 인도를 식민지화하는 과정에서 영국민들은 황제를 잘 따랐을 것이다.황제가 원하든 원하지 않든 인도를 강하게 탄압하는 것은 이미 결정 내려진 것이었다. 그것이 그들이 원하는 것이었고 황제는 그것대로 하면 자신의 위치를 쉽게 유지할 수 있는 것이다. 주인공은 제국주의를 싫어하지만 그 입장을 이해한다. 또 식민지된 나라의 국민으로서 그 고통도 이해한다. 주인공은 코끼리가 괴로워하는 것을 보면서도 코끼리의 심장이 어디있는지 조차 모르고 그냥 쏘기만 한다. 고통을 줄이려고 하지만 더욱 가중하는 것이다. 황제도 그런 마음일까? 영국의 입장에서 인도를 한번에 강하게 탄압하면 쉬어질꺼라고 생각했지만 인도인의 끝없는 저항으로 인도인들만 더 고통을 받는 것인가...인도인은 저항을 할수밖에 없는 입장이고 그 과정에서 영국인 몇명이 죽었을지도 모른다. 그것으로 영국의 인도인을 탄압하는 것은 합법화되는 것인가.. 나는 내가 주인공 입장이라면 아무리 사람들이 기대를 하고 비웃음을 당하더라도 총을 쏘지 않았을 것이다.

독후감/창작| 2006.06.19| 2페이지| 2,500원| 조회(1,718)

감상문, 영작, shooting, Elephant, Shooting an Ele..

미리보기

닫기