· Banks, J. S. and Weingast, B. R., 1992, "The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information," American Journal of Political Science 36(2): 509-524.
· Bawn, K., 1997, "Choosing Strategies to Control the Bureaucracy: Statutory Constraints, Oversight, and the Committee System," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 13(1): 101-126.
· Becker, G. S., 1983, "A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence," Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 371-400.
· Chang, C. and Turnbull, G. K., 2002, "Bureaucratic behavior in the local public sector: A revealed preference theory approach," Public Choice 113: 191-209.
· Downs, A., 1967, Inside Bureaucracy, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
· Dunleavy, P., 1989a, "The Architecture of the British Central State, Part Ⅰ: Framework For Analysis," Public Administration 67 Autumn: 249-275.
· Dunleavy, P., 1989b, "The Architecture of the British Central State, Part Ⅱ: Empirical Findings," Public Administration 67 Winter: 249-275.
· Dunleavy, P., 1991, Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
· Epstein, D. and O`Halloran, S., 1994, "Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion," American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 697-722.
· Epstein, D. and O`Halloran, S., 1996, "Divided Government and the Design of Administrative Procedures: A Formal Model and Empirical Test," The Journal of Politics 58(2): 373-397.
· Eskridge, W. N. and Ferejohn, J., 1992, "Making the Deal Stick: Enforcing the Original Constitutional Structure of Lawmaking in the Modern Regulatory State," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8: 165-189.
· Ferejohn, J. and Shipan, C., 1990, "Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization special issue 6: 1-20.
· Figueiredo, R. P., Spiller, P. T., and Urbiztondo, S., 1999, "An Information Perspective on Administrative Procedures," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15(1): 283-305.
· Hammond, T. H. and Knott, J., 1996, "Who Controls the Bureaucracy?: Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, Legal Constraints, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policy-Making," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 12(1): 119-166.
· Hammond, T. H. and Knott, J., 1992, "Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policymaking," Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
· Hammond, T. H., 1996, "Formal Theory and the Institutions of Governance," Governance 9(2): 107-185.
· Hammond, T. H., Hill, J., and Miller, G. M., 1986, "Presidents, Congress, and the `Congressional Control of Administration` Hypothesis," Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C.
· Hart, O., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W., 1997, "The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and An Application to Prisons," The Quarterly Journal of Economics November: 1127-1161.
· Hill, J., 1985, "Why So Much Stability? The Role of Agency Determined Stability," Public Choice 46: 275-87.
· Holburn, G. L. F. and Bergh, R. G. V., 2004, "Influencing Agencies Through Pivotal Political Institutions," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 20(2): 458-483.
· Hopenhayn, H. and Lohmann, S., 1996, "Fire-Alarm Signals and the Political Oversight of Regulatory Agencies," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 12(1): 196-213.
· Horn, M. J., 1995, The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional choice in the public sector, New York: Cambridge University Press.
· Marsh, D., Smith, M. J., and Richards, D., 2000, "Bureaucrats, Politicians and Reform in Whitehall: Analysing the Bureau-Shaping Model," British Journal of Political Science 30: 461-482.
· McCubbins, M. D. and Schwartz, T., 1984, "Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms," American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165-179.
· McCubbins, M. D., 1985, "The Legislative Design of Regulatory Structure," American Journal of Political Science 29: 721-748.
· McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., and Weingast, B. R., 1987, "Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 243-77.
· McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., and Weingast, B. R., 1989, "Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies," Virginia Law Review 75: 431-82.
· McNollgast, 1999, "The Political Origins of the Administrative Procedure Act," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15(1): 180-217.
· Migue, J. and Belanger, G., 1974, "Toward a General Theory of Managerial Discretion," Public Choice 17: 27-43.
· Moe, T., 1997, "The Positive Theory of Public Bureaucracy," In Dennis Mueller(ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice, New York: Cambridge University Press.
· Nicholson-Crotty, S. and Nicholson-Crotty, J., 2004, "Interest Group Influence on Managerial Priorities in Public Organizations," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(4): 571-583.
· Niskanen, 1971, Bureaucracy and Representative Government, New York: Aldine․Atherton.
· North, D. C., 1990, "A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics 2(4): 355-367.
· Olson, M. K., 1999, "Agency Rulemaking, Political Influences, Regulation, and Industry Compliance," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15(3): 573-601.
· Ostrom, V., 1973, The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
· Peltzman, S., 1976, "Toward a More General Theory of Regulation," Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211-240.
· Ringquist, E. J., Worsham, J., and Eisner, M. A., 2002, "Salience, Complexity, and the Legislative Direction of Regulatory Bureaucracies," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(2): 141-164.
· Stigler, G. J., 1971, "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 13: 3-21.
· Tirole, J., 1986, "Hierachies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2(2): 181-214.
· Tsebelis, G., 1995, "Decision-Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentalism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism," British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289-325.
· Tullock, G., 1965, The Politics of Bureaucracy, Washington, D. C.: Public Affairs Press.
· Weingast, B. R. and Moran, M. J., 1983, "Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Fair Trade Commission," Journal of Political Economy 91(5): 765-800.
· Williamson, O. E., 1981, "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes", Journal of Economic Literature 19: 1537-1568.
· Williamson, O. E., 1999, "Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15: 306-342.
· Wilson, G. K., 1995, "Rationality, Bureaucrats and Politics in Westminster Model System," 「변화하는 행정과 새로운 행정패러다임의 모색」, 한국행정학회.
· Wilson, J. Q. (ed.), 1980, The Politics of Regulation, New York: Basic Books.
· Wilson, J. Q., 1989, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, Basic Books.