해외 부동산 직접투자의 인식에 관한 연구 (A study on the perception of direct investment in overseas real estate)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국토지공법학회
· 수록지 정보 : 토지공법연구 / 99권 / 279 ~ 297페이지
· 저자명 : 최인호

초록

본 연구의 목적은 해외부동산 직접투자에 대한 인식을 파악하는 데 있다. 연구의 방법은 이론연구와 사례연구를 병행한다. 사례연구에 있어서는 부동산업 관련 종사자 100명에 대해 해외부동산 직접투자에 대한 인식의 설문 조사를 실시, 이를 통계 분석하였다. 분석결과, 첫째, 해외부동산 직접투자의 필요에 대해 94%가 긍정적이었고, 4%만이 부정적이었다. 둘째, 선호하는 투자 대상국은 “미국, 캐나다, 유럽과 같은 선진국”이 41%, “베트남, 필리핀, 말레이시아와 같은 개발도상국”이 32%로 높았다. 셋째, 일본 부동산 투자에 대해 91%가 긍정적이었다. 넷째, 해외부동산 직접투자의 동기는 “국내의 강한 규제중심의 부동산 정책“이 56%,” 한국사회의 불투명한 미래“가 25%로 높게 나타났다. 다섯째, 투자의 의도에 있어서 ”안정적 수익률“이 28%, ”저렴한 보유세와 양도소득세“가 27%,” 소유권보장의 확실성“이 23%였다. 여섯째, 해외부동산 직접투자의 장애요인으로는 “해외부동산 관리의 문제”가 53%, “해외 부동산 시장의 무지”가 29%로 높게 나타났다. 이와 같은 분석 결과를 고려하여 정부는 해외 부동산 직접투자자들에게 투자리스크를 저감하고 안정적 투자가 지속될 수 있도록 해외부동산 직접투자의 지원 정책이 필요함을 시사점으로 제시하였다.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate and analyze the perception of direct investment in overseas real estate. The research method combines theoretical research and case study. In the case study, 100 real estate-related workers were surveyed on their perceptions of overseas real estate direct investment, and this was statistically analyzed. Considering the results of the analysis, As a result of the analysis, first, 94% were positive about the need for overseas real estate direct investment, and only 4% were negative. Second, as for preferred investment destination countries, “developed countries such as the United States, Canada, and Europe” were high at 41% and “developing countries such as Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia” were high at 32%. Third, 91% were positive about Japanese real estate investment. Fourth, as for the motives for overseas real estate direct investment, “domestic strong regulation-oriented real estate policy” was found to be high at 56%, and “opaque future of Korean society” was found to be high at 25%. Fifth, in terms of investment intention, “stable rate of return” was 28%, “cheap ownership tax and capital gains tax” was 27%, and “certainty of ownership guarantee” was 23%. Sixth, as obstacles to direct investment in overseas real estate, “problem of overseas real estate management” was found to be high at 53%, and “ignorance of overseas real estate market” was found to be high at 29%. Considering the results of this analysis, the government suggests that a policy to support direct overseas real estate direct investment is needed to reduce investment risk and ensure stable investment for overseas real estate direct investors.

참고자료

· 없음