Research Design : Written Feedback

소개

Research Design : Written Feedback -> 전부 영어

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. Introduction

Ⅱ. Literature of Review
2.1 Fluency and Accuracy
2.2 Form-focused Instruction (FFI)
2.3 Feedback in Teaching Writing
2.4 Written Feedback

Ⅲ. Research Questions

Ⅳ. Method
4.1 Participants
4.2 Materials
4.3 Procedures
4.4 Analyses

Ⅴ. Results

Ⅵ. Discussion /Conclusion

Reference

Appendix

본문내용

Ⅰ. Introduction

Writing is considered the most difficult function to teach and be taught, and it could be regarded natural in a sense, considering that the ability to write is likely to cross the line which discriminates each language function. Beyond vocabulary, grammar and isolated sentences, to write well requires even the ability to incorporate and apply them to what the writer wishes to write. In a consequence, writing can is so complex that anyone with poor writing proficiency is easily overwhelmed and throws the pen away. In the reality of Korean English classroom, for students who can`t get the sense of even words` meaning well, educators can`t help focusing on language form.
Along with the availability of focus on form, feedback type provided to students in teaching writing English is differentiated from that in any other language function because it is usually given by way of students` writing task. In addition to the medium, giving a feedback is challenging to teachers since it requires lots of time and efforts.

참고자료

· 송미정. (1998). 문자 피드백의 유형과 영작문 실력 향상간의 관계. 영어교육. 53(2), 135-156.
· Fiona Hyland. (1998). The Impact of Teacher Written Feedback on Individual Writers. Journal of Second Language Writing. 7(3), 253-286.
· Dana Ferris. (1999). The Case for Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes: A Response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing. 8(1), 1-11.
· Lil Brannon., & C. H. Knoblauch. (1982). College Composition and Communication. 33(2), 157-166.
· Nancy Sommers. (1982). Responding to Student Writing. College Composition and Communication. 33(2), 148-156.
· Tim Ashwell. (2000). Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?. Journal of Second Language Writing. 9(3), 227-257.
· 김민경. (2003). 문법 의식 상승 활동이 중학교 영어학습자의 관사습득과 사용능 력에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교.
· 홍성일. (2003). 형태 초점 의사 소통 교수법을 통한 문법교육. 석사학위논문, 동의 대학교.
· 김소연. (2002). 문법 의식 확대와 동사활용. 석사학위논문, 국민대학교
· Rod Ellis. (1998). Teaching and Research : Options in Grammar Teaching. TESOL QUARTERLY, 32, 42-50.
· Brown H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle. (2nd Ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
· Brown H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (4th Ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
· Anthony Seow. (2002). the Writing Process and Process Writing. In Jack C. Richards, & Willy A. Renandya. (Ed.). Methodology in Language Teaching : An Anthology of Current Practice (pp. 315-320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
· Maggie Sokolik. (2003). Writing. In David Nunan. (Ed.). Practical English Language Teaching. (pp. 70-84). New York: McGraw-Hill/Contemporary.
· 박태현. (2005). The Place of Analytic and Holistic Scorings in EFL Writing Classes. 영미어문학. 75, 213-227.
· 이호. (2005). 영작문 평가 상황에서 학생들의 평가과정에 대한 연구. 영어교육연 구. 17(3), 215-234.
· 이완기. (2003). 영어평가방법론. 서울: 문진미디어.
· Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
· Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher`s guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.