보행우선구역의 서비스 질 평가를 위한 계획 평가항목 설정 및 유형별 가중치 분석 - 보행우선구역 시범사업지구를 중심으로 - (Selection of Evaluation Items for Pedestrian-priority Zone Plan and Weights Analysis according to Zone Types - Focused on Demonstration Projects of Pedestrian-priority Zone -)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대한국토·도시계획학회
· 수록지 정보 : 국토계획 / 47권 / 4호 / 241 ~ 251페이지
· 저자명 : 문준수, 이주림, 구자훈

초록

This paper proposes a new method for estimating quality of service(QOS) for 'Pedestrian-priority Zone(PPZ)'. First, PPZ is classified by the road hierarchy and land use characteristics. Based on expert interview and questionnaire, we select the final evaluation items among the evaluation items derived from literature survey. The obtained data for the indicators were analyzed through Analytic Network Process(ANP). The importance of each evaluation item is calculated by types of PPZ. This study analyzes the differences in importance of evaluation items according to road and land use characteristics. The results show that type 1 and type 3 have commonly the high evaluation items in order of weight; ‘safety facility for the transportation vulnerable’, ‘crossing time for pedestrian’, ‘ramp for the transportation vulnerable’, and ‘safety facility for pedestrian’. Unlike other types, ‘structure of sidewalk’ in type 2 and ‘structure of sidewalk’, ‘structure of crosswalk’ in type 4 are more important than other items. Those evaluation items should be treated by PPZ types in planning process. The evaluation items for PPZ plan is expected to contribute to achieving its policy goals.

영어초록

This paper proposes a new method for estimating quality of service(QOS) for 'Pedestrian-priority Zone(PPZ)'. First, PPZ is classified by the road hierarchy and land use characteristics. Based on expert interview and questionnaire, we select the final evaluation items among the evaluation items derived from literature survey. The obtained data for the indicators were analyzed through Analytic Network Process(ANP). The importance of each evaluation item is calculated by types of PPZ. This study analyzes the differences in importance of evaluation items according to road and land use characteristics. The results show that type 1 and type 3 have commonly the high evaluation items in order of weight; ‘safety facility for the transportation vulnerable’, ‘crossing time for pedestrian’, ‘ramp for the transportation vulnerable’, and ‘safety facility for pedestrian’. Unlike other types, ‘structure of sidewalk’ in type 2 and ‘structure of sidewalk’, ‘structure of crosswalk’ in type 4 are more important than other items. Those evaluation items should be treated by PPZ types in planning process. The evaluation items for PPZ plan is expected to contribute to achieving its policy goals.

참고자료

· 없음