• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

眺望權 法理의 再檢討 (A Review of the Prospect Right)

한국학술지에서 제공하는 국내 최고 수준의 학술 데이터베이스를 통해 다양한 논문과 학술지 정보를 만나보세요.
30 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.24 최종저작일 2010.12
30P 미리보기
眺望權 法理의 再檢討
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 단국대학교 법학연구소
    · 수록지 정보 : 법학논총 / 34권 / 2호 / 125 ~ 154페이지
    · 저자명 : 정민호

    초록

    In Korea, Recognition of the prospect right and concerns on its protection have been increased according to improvement of standard of economic and cultural life. Disputes about prospect right has been also increased because new construction of residential-commercial complex building and rebuilding work at big cities are increasing. Nevertheless, concrete discussion about scope of legal protection of prospect right has not conducted.
    The prospect right means the right to take a view of fine scenery, such as mountain, river, the sea, park and a person whose prospect right has been violated by other’s building of some structures can legally claim for the protection of the right.
    The prospect right is the right to be able to look into the distance or see the scenery in the distance because the prospect means to look out the distance and to view, and the scenery to get the specific region. The prospect right avail to be able to see the agreeable and pleasant scenery. It is not clear that our law system recognize benefit of view as a right. But recently some scholars tends to recognized right to view as a subject of independent legal protection. The theme of this paper is to define the concept of the prospect right and review theory of the prospect right.
    There was established a law of view in protection from infringement in Korea lately. But the prospect right has been considered as reflective or living profit unlike right to sunshine and recognized as additional rights of right to sunshine.
    Japan’s many scholars and case law recognize benefit of view as a right. The right is based on need, duty, claim, rules. The need that rules make the prospect right is sufficient. We might treat it as a environmental rights. but mostly case law do not regard it as a right, it is wrong. The prospect right should be legally protected as a right. In this paper, I studied the case for the prospect right infringement from a law and proposed legislation ways through diverse theory. The purpose is to research in legal principles of prospect right infringement, to propose legislation ways from the legal bases of the civil law.
    All of fine scenery is not protected by the law, but to be legally protected, it should be objectively proved that the scenery has the value as benefit for living.
    If we admit the prospect right, we must scrutinize satisfying the required conditions. The person who has been damaged by illegal violation of prospect can claim the offender for prevention or removal of disturbance. This study is to seek method to ensure efficacy of legal protection of the prospect right by establishing legal principles.

    영어초록

    In Korea, Recognition of the prospect right and concerns on its protection have been increased according to improvement of standard of economic and cultural life. Disputes about prospect right has been also increased because new construction of residential-commercial complex building and rebuilding work at big cities are increasing. Nevertheless, concrete discussion about scope of legal protection of prospect right has not conducted.
    The prospect right means the right to take a view of fine scenery, such as mountain, river, the sea, park and a person whose prospect right has been violated by other’s building of some structures can legally claim for the protection of the right.
    The prospect right is the right to be able to look into the distance or see the scenery in the distance because the prospect means to look out the distance and to view, and the scenery to get the specific region. The prospect right avail to be able to see the agreeable and pleasant scenery. It is not clear that our law system recognize benefit of view as a right. But recently some scholars tends to recognized right to view as a subject of independent legal protection. The theme of this paper is to define the concept of the prospect right and review theory of the prospect right.
    There was established a law of view in protection from infringement in Korea lately. But the prospect right has been considered as reflective or living profit unlike right to sunshine and recognized as additional rights of right to sunshine.
    Japan’s many scholars and case law recognize benefit of view as a right. The right is based on need, duty, claim, rules. The need that rules make the prospect right is sufficient. We might treat it as a environmental rights. but mostly case law do not regard it as a right, it is wrong. The prospect right should be legally protected as a right. In this paper, I studied the case for the prospect right infringement from a law and proposed legislation ways through diverse theory. The purpose is to research in legal principles of prospect right infringement, to propose legislation ways from the legal bases of the civil law.
    All of fine scenery is not protected by the law, but to be legally protected, it should be objectively proved that the scenery has the value as benefit for living.
    If we admit the prospect right, we must scrutinize satisfying the required conditions. The person who has been damaged by illegal violation of prospect can claim the offender for prevention or removal of disturbance. This study is to seek method to ensure efficacy of legal protection of the prospect right by establishing legal principles.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“법학논총”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

찾으시던 자료가 아닌가요?

지금 보는 자료와 연관되어 있어요!
왼쪽 화살표
오른쪽 화살표
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 03일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
6:09 오후