단위학교재정평가에 대한 교직원의 인식 연구 (A Study on School Staffs' Recognition of School Finance Evaluation)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 인하대학교 교육연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 교육문화연구 / 11권 / 31 ~ 55페이지
· 저자명 : 강경석, 최영숙

초록

The purpose of this study is to search into the school staffs' understanding of the Education Finance Evaluation. The subjects are 250 school staffs that consist of principals . head teachers, teachers and administrative managers.
The questionnaire has been made out through the validation process which made sure if each question was relevant to the purpose of the study by giving different points for different answers. (i.e. very much relevant 5 points, generally relevant 4 points, so-so 3 points, somewhat irrelevant 2 points and very irrelevant I point each.)The data analyses have been performed by using SPSS Win(11.0) with mean, standard deviation, F-test(ANOVA), and Pearson's Correlation. If the average points are over 3.5, the questions can be considered relevant.
Every question in the questionnaire has proved to be relevant to the study as average points were ranging from 3.82 to 4.64.
Through the analysis of the results, the followings can be stated;1. Teachers are eager to know about school finance and to have an influence on it.
2. Teachers are comparatively less interested in securing and managing school finances, while principals and head teachers are very much interested.
3. Teachers want school budgets to be made up openly and they think the budget planning for the costs of direct education is the most important thing. Principals and head teachers take educational consumers' demands most seriously.
4. Teachers want the budgets to be executed by their will, whereas administrative managers want them to be enforced by the book.
5. Teachers assess the school financial results most positively, followed by principals and head teachers and administrative managers in order.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to search into the school staffs' understanding of the Education Finance Evaluation. The subjects are 250 school staffs that consist of principals . head teachers, teachers and administrative managers.
The questionnaire has been made out through the validation process which made sure if each question was relevant to the purpose of the study by giving different points for different answers. (i.e. very much relevant 5 points, generally relevant 4 points, so-so 3 points, somewhat irrelevant 2 points and very irrelevant I point each.)The data analyses have been performed by using SPSS Win(11.0) with mean, standard deviation, F-test(ANOVA), and Pearson's Correlation. If the average points are over 3.5, the questions can be considered relevant.
Every question in the questionnaire has proved to be relevant to the study as average points were ranging from 3.82 to 4.64.
Through the analysis of the results, the followings can be stated;1. Teachers are eager to know about school finance and to have an influence on it.
2. Teachers are comparatively less interested in securing and managing school finances, while principals and head teachers are very much interested.
3. Teachers want school budgets to be made up openly and they think the budget planning for the costs of direct education is the most important thing. Principals and head teachers take educational consumers' demands most seriously.
4. Teachers want the budgets to be executed by their will, whereas administrative managers want them to be enforced by the book.
5. Teachers assess the school financial results most positively, followed by principals and head teachers and administrative managers in order.

참고자료

· 없음