• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

국제조약에서의 부동산투자 분쟁 해결에 대한 연구 (A Study on Real Estate Investment Dispute Settlements in International Treaties)

46 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.05.19 최종저작일 2012.06
46P 미리보기
국제조약에서의 부동산투자 분쟁 해결에 대한 연구
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국부동산경영학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 부동산경영 / 5호 / 131 ~ 176페이지
    · 저자명 : 정태식

    초록

    After signing a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Chile in 2002, South Korea has concluded FTA negotiations with Singapore, EFTA, ASEAN, the United States, the European Union, India, and Peru, while in negotiations for FTAs with Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, China, Australia, and GCC (as of 2012). South Korea is creating conditions for future FTAs with each region.
    South Korea invests a lot of time and effort in FTA negotiations with each overseas region because Regional Trade Agreements (RTAa) based on FTAs have been increasing rapidly around the world since the early 1990s, while its multilateral trade negotiations initiated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) remain in the doldrums, making any major progress. The WTO statistics show that a total of 380 RTA conclusions (including those for the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) were reported to WTO from around the world as of July 2007; among them, 240 conclusions were announced after the establishment of WTO in January 1995, 223 RTAs are being implemented as of September 2008, and 136 RTAs were concluded in the form of FTA.
    Another reason behind the flood of FTAs all over the globe may be that WTO attaches importance to multilateral trades and the WTO regulations exceptionally accept FTAs not running counter to several sub-sections. For example, the fact that tariff and other restrictions on other regions shall not be downgraded as compared with before the FTA settlement, although these agreements run counter to the Most Favored Nation (MFN) treatment.
    Considering both the global situation in which FTAs become universal and the domestic situation where the percentage of overseas trades in the South Korean economy is on the gradual increase (with the percentage of import and export in the Gross National Income (GNI) representing 94.2% as of 2007), South Korea can become alienated from international trade relationships and cannot possibly benefit from FTA-based preferential trade if it fails to swim with this global current of the times.
    In relation to the current issue of the reduced growth rate caused by low birthrate and an aging population, FTAs are also regarded as essential to the country in improving productivity through competition, securing stable overseas markets, and expanding foreign direct investment (FDI) domestically.
    To cope with this stream of the times for FTAs, South Korea is pursuing FTAs with many countries simultaneously, and has concluded agreements with large economies, including the United States, the European Union, and India in 2007, 2010, and 2010, respectively.
    South Korea chose to sign FTAs with these regions because they are the world's largest export markets. With South Korea-EU and South Korea-US FTAs coming into force in 2011 and March 2012, respectively, this study aims to investigate how the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSDI) will settle relevant real estate investment disputes.

    영어초록

    After signing a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Chile in 2002, South Korea has concluded FTA negotiations with Singapore, EFTA, ASEAN, the United States, the European Union, India, and Peru, while in negotiations for FTAs with Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, China, Australia, and GCC (as of 2012). South Korea is creating conditions for future FTAs with each region.
    South Korea invests a lot of time and effort in FTA negotiations with each overseas region because Regional Trade Agreements (RTAa) based on FTAs have been increasing rapidly around the world since the early 1990s, while its multilateral trade negotiations initiated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) remain in the doldrums, making any major progress. The WTO statistics show that a total of 380 RTA conclusions (including those for the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) were reported to WTO from around the world as of July 2007; among them, 240 conclusions were announced after the establishment of WTO in January 1995, 223 RTAs are being implemented as of September 2008, and 136 RTAs were concluded in the form of FTA.
    Another reason behind the flood of FTAs all over the globe may be that WTO attaches importance to multilateral trades and the WTO regulations exceptionally accept FTAs not running counter to several sub-sections. For example, the fact that tariff and other restrictions on other regions shall not be downgraded as compared with before the FTA settlement, although these agreements run counter to the Most Favored Nation (MFN) treatment.
    Considering both the global situation in which FTAs become universal and the domestic situation where the percentage of overseas trades in the South Korean economy is on the gradual increase (with the percentage of import and export in the Gross National Income (GNI) representing 94.2% as of 2007), South Korea can become alienated from international trade relationships and cannot possibly benefit from FTA-based preferential trade if it fails to swim with this global current of the times.
    In relation to the current issue of the reduced growth rate caused by low birthrate and an aging population, FTAs are also regarded as essential to the country in improving productivity through competition, securing stable overseas markets, and expanding foreign direct investment (FDI) domestically.
    To cope with this stream of the times for FTAs, South Korea is pursuing FTAs with many countries simultaneously, and has concluded agreements with large economies, including the United States, the European Union, and India in 2007, 2010, and 2010, respectively.
    South Korea chose to sign FTAs with these regions because they are the world's largest export markets. With South Korea-EU and South Korea-US FTAs coming into force in 2011 and March 2012, respectively, this study aims to investigate how the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSDI) will settle relevant real estate investment disputes.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

찾으시던 자료가 아닌가요?

지금 보는 자료와 연관되어 있어요!
왼쪽 화살표
오른쪽 화살표
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 28일 토요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
9:41 오후