• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

한말 ‘자유주의’의 수용과 분화 -일본유학생을 중심으로- (Embracement of Liberalism at the end of the Daehan Imperial period, and Certain Divergences - Examination of Students who were studying in Japan -)

44 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.28 최종저작일 2015.09
44P 미리보기
한말 ‘자유주의’의 수용과 분화 -일본유학생을 중심으로-
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국역사연구회
    · 수록지 정보 : 역사와 현실 / 97호 / 335 ~ 378페이지
    · 저자명 : 노상균

    초록

    Liberalism was essentially a principle that was designed to battle premodern social norms, so it was a vital part of the modern society’s formation and development. In other words, it was a pivotal starting point for modern philosophies. And it played an important role in the modernization process of Korea as well. Since the opening of ports, through liberation from the Japanese imperial occupation, Koreans who lived through the modern and contemporary periods of Korean history, chose and embraced liberalism as an ideological platform for a modern state construction. Considering all that, determining the historical flow of liberalism in Korea would undoubtedly shed some light upon the task of determining what kind of process the Koreans took in their founding of modern states, as well as the nature of characteristics displayed along the way.
    Historical studies of the Koreans’ embracement of liberalism only began in the late 1990s, even though it was a very important theme in Korean modern and contemporary developments. Primarily examined were historical figures who were involved in the early enlightenment movements or the Independence Club, and mostly analyzed were liberal concepts such as ‘freedom,’ ‘individual,’ ‘(civil) rights,’ ‘political rights’ and ‘constitutionalism,’ in terms of how they were perceived by the Koreans at the time. Also examined were the political and social meaning of the Koreans’ acceptance of liberalism and the nature of such acceptance process. Impressive achievements were made in a rather short time, but considering the fact that previous studies concentrated upon determining what happened in the ‘embracement’ stage, how such efforts progressed, and what actually happened along the way, are yet to be examined.
    In order to overcome such problems, attempted in this article is an analysis of the process taken by Korean students, who were studying in Japan during the ending years of the Daehan imperial period, in their embracement of liberalism and how they actually viewed it. Also, a particular focus was placed upon the ‘dilemma’ that haunted all these students. At the time, the Daehan empire lost its sovereignty and became a protectorate, and was deprived by the Tonggam-bu office of all meaningful self-control. In the wake of such tragic events, intellectuals found themselves in a position which could force them to choose one goal to pursue between two very much important objectives: securing individual freedom from an oppressive premodern social structure, and securing the independence of the state from an imperialist invasion. That kind of dilemma started to tear themselves apart. Korea, which was the only state to suffer colonial occupation among all three Northeast Asian countries, had this unique problem that shaped Korean liberalism in a most peculiar way.
    The failures, frustrations and subsequent efforts of the Korean students who were studying in Japan at the end of the Daehan imperial period, who devised liberal reforms but were not able to maintain the spirit of it, and the public opinion that was vocally critical of such attempt, show us that Korean liberalism, entrenched in a colonized reality, was indeed starting to fracture. Their liberal suggestions were met with stark criticism because somewhere along the way it became clear that their suggestions would lead to Koreans’ assimilation into a structure of colonial ruling, and would force Koreans to steer away from their ultimate goal of liberating themselves from the clutches of Japanese imperialism. Initially they embraced liberalism as a method that would hopefully help them regain their country’s independence, but with their failure to explore other aspects of liberalism, the aspect that they did dig into actually ended up being abused as a theory that would justify their own cooperation and collaboration with Japanese authorities.

    영어초록

    Liberalism was essentially a principle that was designed to battle premodern social norms, so it was a vital part of the modern society’s formation and development. In other words, it was a pivotal starting point for modern philosophies. And it played an important role in the modernization process of Korea as well. Since the opening of ports, through liberation from the Japanese imperial occupation, Koreans who lived through the modern and contemporary periods of Korean history, chose and embraced liberalism as an ideological platform for a modern state construction. Considering all that, determining the historical flow of liberalism in Korea would undoubtedly shed some light upon the task of determining what kind of process the Koreans took in their founding of modern states, as well as the nature of characteristics displayed along the way.
    Historical studies of the Koreans’ embracement of liberalism only began in the late 1990s, even though it was a very important theme in Korean modern and contemporary developments. Primarily examined were historical figures who were involved in the early enlightenment movements or the Independence Club, and mostly analyzed were liberal concepts such as ‘freedom,’ ‘individual,’ ‘(civil) rights,’ ‘political rights’ and ‘constitutionalism,’ in terms of how they were perceived by the Koreans at the time. Also examined were the political and social meaning of the Koreans’ acceptance of liberalism and the nature of such acceptance process. Impressive achievements were made in a rather short time, but considering the fact that previous studies concentrated upon determining what happened in the ‘embracement’ stage, how such efforts progressed, and what actually happened along the way, are yet to be examined.
    In order to overcome such problems, attempted in this article is an analysis of the process taken by Korean students, who were studying in Japan during the ending years of the Daehan imperial period, in their embracement of liberalism and how they actually viewed it. Also, a particular focus was placed upon the ‘dilemma’ that haunted all these students. At the time, the Daehan empire lost its sovereignty and became a protectorate, and was deprived by the Tonggam-bu office of all meaningful self-control. In the wake of such tragic events, intellectuals found themselves in a position which could force them to choose one goal to pursue between two very much important objectives: securing individual freedom from an oppressive premodern social structure, and securing the independence of the state from an imperialist invasion. That kind of dilemma started to tear themselves apart. Korea, which was the only state to suffer colonial occupation among all three Northeast Asian countries, had this unique problem that shaped Korean liberalism in a most peculiar way.
    The failures, frustrations and subsequent efforts of the Korean students who were studying in Japan at the end of the Daehan imperial period, who devised liberal reforms but were not able to maintain the spirit of it, and the public opinion that was vocally critical of such attempt, show us that Korean liberalism, entrenched in a colonized reality, was indeed starting to fracture. Their liberal suggestions were met with stark criticism because somewhere along the way it became clear that their suggestions would lead to Koreans’ assimilation into a structure of colonial ruling, and would force Koreans to steer away from their ultimate goal of liberating themselves from the clutches of Japanese imperialism. Initially they embraced liberalism as a method that would hopefully help them regain their country’s independence, but with their failure to explore other aspects of liberalism, the aspect that they did dig into actually ended up being abused as a theory that would justify their own cooperation and collaboration with Japanese authorities.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 19일 목요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
4:27 오전