국립공원 탐방로 안전지수 및 등급분석에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Safety Index and Grade Analysis in National Park Trails)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국산림휴양복지학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국산림휴양학회지 / 24권 / 4호 / 13 ~ 24페이지
· 저자명 : 박준효, 전계원, 박상준, 김명준, 윤주웅

초록

본 연구에서는 탐방로 안전성 평가 모델을 활용하여 21개 국립공원을 대상으로 안전지수와 등급분석을 수행하였다. 현장조사를 통해 탐방로 주변 위험요소 중 하나라도 확인되면 취약구간으로 판단하여 안전지수를 산출하였다. 취약구간은 총 180.4km로 조사되었으며 탐방로 총 연장 1,995.5km 대비 약 9.0%로 확인되었다. 안전지수는총 200점 중 최소 42.3점에서 최대 167.0점 분포를 보이고 평균값은 101.5점으로 나타났다. 안전지수를 토대로 등급을 분석한 결과, ‘관심(Concern)’ 등급은 60.8km(34%), ‘주의(Caution)’ 등급은 57.8km(32%), ‘위험(Dangerous)’ 등급은49.6km(27%), ‘매우위험(Very dangerous)’ 등급은 12.2km(7%)로 나타났다. 매우위험 구간은 북한산국립공원(6.0km), 지리산국립공원(3.3km), 오대산국립공원(1.6km), 설악산국립공원(0.9km), 월악산국립공원(0.4km), 속리산국립공원(0.01km) 등 6개 국립공원 탐방로에서 총 12.2km로 나타났다. 북한산국립공원은 Y계곡, 의상능선 등이 해당되며, 지리산국립공원은 칠선계곡, 구룡계곡에서 확인되었다. 오대산국립공원은 노인봉 일원, 설악산국립공원은 공룡능선, 흘림골 등에서 나타났다. 월악산국립공원은 금수산 일원, 속리산국립공원 막장봉 구간이 매우위험 구간으로나타났다. 본 연구는 향후 재난위험 저감대책 수립과 탐방로 정비 우선순위 선정 등 국립공원 안전관리 정책을 수립하기 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있다.

영어초록

In this study, the safety indexing and grading analysis were conducted for 21 national parks,using the trail safety evaluation model. If any one of the risk factors around the trail was identified through a field survey, the safety index was calculated by judging it as a vulnerability zone. The vulnerability zone was 180.4km in total, and it was found to be about 9.0% compared to the total length of 1,995.5km. The safety index was distributed from the minimum of 42.3 to the maximum of 167.0, and the average value was 101.5 of total 200 scores. As a result of analyzing the grade based on the safety index, 60.8km (34%) was in the ‘Concern’ grade, 57.8km (32%) was in the ‘Caution’ grade, 49.6km (27%) was in the ‘Dangerous’ grade, and 12.2km (7%) was in the ‘Very dangerous’ grade. ‘Very dangerous’ sections were found to be a total of 12.2 km. including 6 national park trails: Bukhansan National Park (6.0km), Jirisan National Park (3.3km), Odaesan National Park (1.6km), Seoraksan National Park (0.9km), Woraksan National Park (0.4km), Songnisan National Park (0.01km). In terms of ‘Very dangerous’ section, Bukhansan National Park included Y Valley and Uisang Ridge, and Jirisan National Park included Chilseon Valley and Guryong Valley. The area of Noinbong in Odaesan National Park, and Gongnyong Ridge and Heulimgol in Seoraksan National Park were included. And the Geumsusan area in Wolaksan National Park and Makjangbong in Songnisan National Park were found to be ‘Very dangerous’. This study could be used as basic data to establish national park safety management policies, such as selecting priority of trail maintenance and establishing countermeasures to reduce disaster risk.

참고자료

· 없음