*승* 스토어

*승*

개인

팔로워0 팔로우

소개

등록된 소개글이 없습니다.

전문분야 등록된 전문분야가 없습니다.

판매자 정보

학교정보

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

직장정보

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

자격증

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

판매지수

판매중 자료수

1개
전체 판매량

7개
최근 3개월 판매량

0개
자료후기 점수

-
자료문의 응답률

-

전체자료 1개

philosophy on love

What is love? For most of us love is one of the closest and the most important things which influences our daily lives. Thousands of music, poems, movies, plays and etc are based on love. Also, it is our love for something or someone which inspires us to live our lives to the fullest. Some live in order to make his or her loved ones happy. Some live in order to fulfill his or her love for a job or a dream. However, when I started to think more seriously about love, I started to wonder what love actually is. Is love something “good” as most of us consider it to be? Even though we believe that love is something really familiar to us, is love what we really think it is? What is nature of love?Before, any serious discussion about the philosophy of love and the nature of love, I would like to discuss my simple and random thoughts about love. My philosophy on love involves two people. It's a physical thing but yet not physical at all. You hold your love and look at it (whatever that subject f love that we are all familiar with, the philosophy of love dealt by many distinguished philosophers, such as, Plato and Aristotle, is much more abstruse. Thus, with the help from these distinguished philosophers, I will try to define the nature of love and add on some more meat to my philosophy of love.Before we even start defining nature of love, we have to presume that love has a nature to start off with.. It should be, to some extent at least, describable within the concepts of language. But what is meant by an appropriate language of description for love when it is so philosophically beguiling and confusing. Such considerations invoke the philosophy of language, of the relevance and appropriateness of meanings, but they also provide the analysis of 'love' with its first principles. Does it exist and if so, is it knowable, comprehensible, and describable? Love may be knowable and comprehensible to others, as understood in the phrases, "I am in love", "I love you", but what 'love' ros is that ideal beauty, which is reflected in the particular images of beauty we find, becomes interchangeable across people and things, ideas, and art. To love is to love the Platonic form of beauty, not a particular individual, but the element which posses true (Ideal) beauty. Reciprocity is not necessary to Plato's view of love, for the desire is for the object (of Beauty), than for, say, the company of another and shared values and pursuits.Some may hold that love is physical, which means that love is nothing but a physical response to another whom the agent feels physically attracted to. Accordingly, the action of loving encompasses a broad range of behavior including caring, listening, attending to, preferring to others, and so on which would be proposed by behaviorists. Others such as physicalists and geneticists, reduce all examinations of love to the physical motivation of the sexual impulse-the simple sexual instinct that is shared with all complex living entities, which mat form Aristotelian love is that a man loves himself. Without an egoistic basis, he cannot extend sympathy and affection to others. Such self-love is not hedonistic, or glorified, depending on the pursuit of immediate pleasures or the adulation of the crowd, it is instead a reflection of his pursuit of the noble and virtuous, which culminate in the pursuit of the reflective life.Agape refers to the paternal love of God for man and for man for God but is extended to include a brotherly love for all humanity. Agape arguably draws on elements from both eros and philia in that it seeks a perfect kind of love that is at once a fondness, a transcending of the particular, and a passion without the necessity of reciprocity. The concept is expanded on in the Judaic-Christian tradition of loving God: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might" (Deuteronomy 6:5) and loving "thy neighbor as thyself" (Leviticus 19:18). The love of God requal aspects in love involve the moral appropriateness of loving, and the forms it should or should not take. The subject area raises such questions as: is it ethically acceptable to love an object, or to love oneself? Is love to oneself or to another a duty? Should the ethically minded person aim to love all people equally? Is partial love morally acceptable or permissible (i.e., not right, but excusable)? Should love only involve those with whom the agent can have a meaningful relationship? Should love aim to transcend sexual desire or physical appearances? May notions of romantic, sexual love apply to same sex couples? Some of the subject area naturally spills into the ethics of sex, which deals with the appropriateness of sexual activity, reproduction, hetero and homosexual activity, and so on.Just as an additional note, I’ll apply this theory of love to some of the things we have learned in class this semester. We have learned about artificial intelligence through out the semester a”

인문/어학| 2002.12.16| 5페이지| 1,000원| 조회(566)

사랑, LOVE, ero

미리보기

닫기