· Alden, D.L, Mukherje, A. & Hoyer, W.D. 2000, ‘The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, pg. 1,15.
· Alden, D.L. & Hoyer, W.D. 1993, ‘An Examination of Cognitive Factors Related to Humorousness in Television Advertising,’ Journal of Advertising, 22 (2), 29-37.
· Biswas, A., Olsen, J. E. & Carlet, V. 1992, ‘A comparison of print advertisements from the United States and France’ , Journal of Advertising, Vol. 21, p. 73-81.
· Campbell, L. & Parsons, A.L. 1995, ‘The Use of Humor in Different Advertising Media,’ Journal of Advertising Research, 35 (May/June), 44-56.
· Givens, D. B., 1983 , Love signals, New York: Crown.
· Homepage of Walterw.de., Humour in Advertising, Viewed 1 November 2007, < http://www.walterw.de/docs/humour_ad.pdf>.
· O’Donnell, Doran Layne 2003, The sharing of humor: Sympathetic and empathetic uses of humor, The University of Southern Mississippi, 144 pgs
· Petrecca, L. 2007 ‘Axe ads turn up the promise of sex appeal’, USA TODAY, 17 April.
· Reichert, 2002, ‘Sex in advertising research: A review of content, effects, and functions of sexual information in consumer advertising’, Annual Review of Sex Research, Vol.13, p.271.
· Ruth, W. J., Mosatche , H. S. & Kramer, 1989, ‘Freudian sexual symbolism: Theoretical considerations and an empirical test in advertising’ , Psychological Reports, Vol. 64, p. 1131-1139.
· Shabbir. H. & Thwaites, D. 2007, ‘The Use of Humor to Mask Deceptive Advertising: It`s No Laughing Matter’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 36, No. 2, Summer.
· Spotts, H.E., Weinberger, M.G & Parsons, A.L. 1997, ‘Assessing the use and impact of humor on advertising effectiveness: A contingency approach’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.17-33.
· Trappey, 1996, ‘A meta-analysis of consumer choice and subliminal advertising’, Psychology & Marketing , Vol.13 , p. 517-530.
· Theus, K. T. 1994, ‘Subliminal advertising and the psychology of processing unconscious stimuli: A review of research’, Psychology & Marketing, Vol.11, p. 271-290.