한국판 바인랜드 적응행동척도 3판의 변별타당도: 특수교육 집단을 대상으로 (Discriminant Validity of the Korean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition(K-Vineland-3): For Special Education Students)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국발달장애학회
· 수록지 정보 : 발달장애연구 / 29권 / 1호 / 439 ~ 453페이지
· 저자명 : 정효인, 박우람, 정용석, 홍상황

초록

이 연구는 개인의 적응행동을 측정, 평가하는 데 널리 사용되고 있는 한국판 바인랜드 적응행동척도 3판 (Korean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition, K-Vineland-3)의 변별타당도를 알아보는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 K-Vineland-3의 보호자 평정형과 면담형을 사용하여 특수교육대상자 105명과 이들의 성별과 연령을 대응시킨 일반표본 105명, 총 210명의 자료를 분석하였고, 도출된 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 특수교육대상자 자료의 내적 합치도를 알아본 결과, 4개 주영역과 부적응행동은 .88∼.99 범위(중앙치 .99), 11개 하위영역은 .81∼.98(중앙치 .90)로 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 특수교육대상자와 일반 집단(대응표 본)의 주영역과 하위영역 점수의 차이를 비교한 결과, 4개 주영역과 11개 하위영역의 점수는 특수교육대상자집 단이 일반집단의 평균에서 약 –2표준편차 이상 유의미하게 낮고, 부적응행동의 총점과 내재화, 외현화 하위영 역의 점수는 특수교육대상자집단이 일반집단보다 2표준편차 이상 유의미하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 연 령에 따른 두 집단의 점수 변화를 살펴본 결과, 두 집단의 점수 차이가 분명하고 부적응행동을 제외한 4개의 주영역과 적응행동 조합점수(ABC)는 연령 증가에 따라 점수가 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 특수교육대상 자와 일반 집단의 점수를 판별분석한 결과, 적응행동 조합점수(ABC)만을 사용하여 두 집단을 판별할 경우, 일 반집단을 일반집단, 특수교육대상자집단을 특수교육대상자집단으로 정확하게 분류하는 정확율은 각각 95.2%, 88.0%인 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 이 연구의 의미와 시사점을 논의하였다.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate the discriminant validity of the Korean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Third Edition (K-Vineland-3), which is used to measure and evaluate individual adaptive behavior. For this purpose, using the guardian rating and interview forms of K-Vineland-3, 105 people eligible for special education (38 with intellectual disability, 33 with autism, 34 with developmental delay), 105 general samples matched by gender and age, Data from a total of 210 people were collected and analyzed, and the results were as follows. First, as a result of examining the internal consistency of the data for special education subjects, the four main areas and maladaptive behavior ranged from .88 to .99 (median .99), and the 11 sub-domains ranged from .81 to .98 (median .90), which was very high. It was found to be good. Second, in order to find out the difference in scores between those eligible for special education and the general group (corresponding sample), the average and standard deviation of the scores in the main domain and sub-domain were calculated, and the difference in scores between the two groups was compared, resulting in 4 main domains and 11 sub-domains. The score of the domain was found to be significantly lower than the average of the general group by more than -2 standard deviations in the special education group. In comparison, the total score of maladaptive behavior and the scores of internalization and externalization sub-areas were found to be significantly higher by more than 2 standard deviations in the special education group compared to the general group. And as a result of examining the change in scores of the two groups according to age, the difference in scores between the two groups was clear, but the scores of the four main areas excluding maladaptive behavior and the adaptive behavior combination (ABC) were found to increase with age. Third, as a result of discriminant analysis of the scores of the special education group and the general group, when discriminating between the two groups using only the adaptive behavior combination score(ABC), the general group is accurately classified as the general group, and the special education group is accurately classified as the special education group. The accuracy rates were found to be 95.2% and 88%, respectively. Finally, the meaning and implications of this study were discussed.

참고자료

· 없음