기후불의와 신환경제국주의: 기후담론과 탄소시장의 해부를 중심으로 (Climate Injustice and Neo-Environmental Imperialism:Focused on the Analysis of Climate Discourses and Carbon Markets)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국환경정책학회
· 수록지 정보 : 환경정책 / 16권 / 1호 / 135 ~ 167페이지
· 저자명 : 윤순진

초록

With proceeding of climate change, “climate justice and climate injustice" have appeared as
a critical issue. This paper explores the responding processes of the international society to
climate change and deals with climate injustice and environmental imperialism deepened in
that process. Proceeding of climate change itself embraces climate injustice in that countries
least responsible for the advent of climate change are most vulnerable to and least resilient
against the damage resulting from climate change. Therefore, it is necessary to redress climate
injustice within the limits of greenhouse gas absorption capacity of the global
atmosphere. Currently, however, global responses to climate change have broadened neo-environmental
imperialism and deepened climate injustice through emission growth rate-centered
climate discourses, developed countries' merciful, not obligatory, aid to developing countries
and insufficiency of the aid scale, operation of carbon markets with little concern about equity,
and strengthening of emission regulation in international markets.

영어초록

With proceeding of climate change, “climate justice and climate injustice" have appeared as
a critical issue. This paper explores the responding processes of the international society to
climate change and deals with climate injustice and environmental imperialism deepened in
that process. Proceeding of climate change itself embraces climate injustice in that countries
least responsible for the advent of climate change are most vulnerable to and least resilient
against the damage resulting from climate change. Therefore, it is necessary to redress climate
injustice within the limits of greenhouse gas absorption capacity of the global
atmosphere. Currently, however, global responses to climate change have broadened neo-environmental
imperialism and deepened climate injustice through emission growth rate-centered
climate discourses, developed countries' merciful, not obligatory, aid to developing countries
and insufficiency of the aid scale, operation of carbon markets with little concern about equity,
and strengthening of emission regulation in international markets.

참고자료

· 없음