키워드네트워크 분석을 활용한 중국 일대일로(OBOR) 사업에 관한 연구동향 분석 (An Analysis of the “One Belt, One Road” Research Trend Using Social Network Analysis)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국해운물류학회
· 수록지 정보 : 해운물류연구 / 32권 / 2호 / 387 ~ 413페이지
· 저자명 : 송민근, 차영두, 여기태

초록

본 연구는 SNA(Social Network Analysis)를 이용하여 중국 일대일로 사업의 연구 동향을 파악하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 분석은 중국과 한국의 일대일로 연구 논문을 대상으로 했으며 중국 341개, 한국 73개 논문의 키워드를 통해 네트워크를 구성했다. 분석 결과, 공통적으로 OBOR, Trade, Cooperation 등이 높은 빈도를 보였고, 한국에서는 Eurasia Initiative에서 높은 빈도가 확인되었다. 연결 중심성에서 Strategy, China, Cooperation, Development, Trade, International, Logistics등이 높은 순위를 보였으며, 매개 중심성도 연결중심성과 큰 차이를 보이지 않았지만 한국 네트워크에선 AIIB, Eurasia 등이 상대적으로 높게 나타났다. 또한, 개별단어 네트워크를 구성하여 러시아, 인도, 미국 등 주요국가의 관련 키워드를 도출했으며, 한국이 중국과 대비하여 개별국가 및 지역에 대한 연구가 부족한 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

영어초록

The Chinese government has expressed commitment toward the “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) project, which aims to construct large-scale logistics infrastructure across an extensive region spanning Central, West, and South Asia; the Persian Gulf; the Mediterranean Sea; the Indian Ocean; Europe; and the South Pacific. Additionally, the OBOR project activities between China and other major countries are already underway. In South Korea, the OBOR project has been drawing increasing attention of the central government, local governments, and major research institutes such as those pertaining to logistics (shipping, transportation), economy, trade, politics, diplomacy, culture and so on.
As OBOR would be conducted by China and several other countries, there could be diverse viewpoints highlighting the “positives,” “negatives,” “opportunities,” and “threats” of the project. Every single country associated with the OBOR project would have its own interpretation and approach. The correspondence strategies and projects derived from every single country would together constitute the OBOR project. To understand the project properly and find out the best way to cooperate, cope with, and utilize, there is a need for continuous and patient research. The research should be focused not only on the general understanding of OBOR but also on its specific projects in major countries.
The purpose of this study is to identify the research trend regarding the OBOR project using SNA (social network analysis). The analysis was conducted by reviewing OBOR-related research papers published in China and South Korea as of April 2016. A total of 2,046 and 335 keywords were derived from the total keywords presented in 341 papers of China and 73 papers of Korea, respectively, for constructing a keyword network. Frequency analyses demonstrated that words such as “OBOR,” “trade,” and “cooperation” showed high frequencies in both China and Korea, while “Eurasia initiative” showed a high frequency in the Korean papers. In addition, in terms of network connection centrality, “strategy,” “China,” “cooperation,” “development,” “trade,” “international,” and “logistics” ranked high in both China and Korea. Although the difference between connection centrality and mediation centrality was not much, some mediation centrality keywords such as “AIIB” (which stands for Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank) and “Eurasia” had relatively high frequencies in Korea. Analysis on close centrality demonstrated that the Chinese papers showed significant values for “capital account liberalization,” “business ethics,” and “lone wolf.” In addition, individual word networks were constructed with country names to derive keywords related to major countries, such as Russia, Mongolia, Pakistan, India, Vietnam and the United States. Compared to China, South Korea had relatively insufficient studies regarding individual countries and regions.

참고자료

· 없음