소셜 네트워크와 데이터 마이닝 기법을 활용한 학문 분야 중심 및 융합 키워드 추천 서비스 (Recommending Core and Connecting Keywords of Research Area Using Social Network and Data Mining Techniques)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국지능정보시스템학회
· 수록지 정보 : 지능정보연구 / 17권 / 1호 / 127 ~ 138페이지
· 저자명 : 조인동, 김남규

초록

대부분의 연구포털 사이트는 관심 분야의 논문을 획득하고자 하는 연구자를 대상으로 한 서비스를 주로 제공하고 있다. 하지만 이러한 서비스는 정확한 서지사항을 알고 있는 일부 사용자의 경우 손쉽게 이용할 수 있지만, 대부분의 이용자는 원하는 자료를 획득하기 위해 키워드 검색을 통한 반복적 시행착오를 겪게 된다. 특히 사용자가 익숙하지 않은 분야의 논문을 검색하는 경우에는, 찾고자 하는 논문의 적절한 키워드 자체를 알지 못하여 검색에 큰 어려움을 겪게 된다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위해 일부 연구포털 사이트에서는 온라인 쇼핑몰의 상품 추천에 주로 사용되어 온 연관관계 분석 기반 키워드 추천 서비스를 채택하고 있다. 하지만 연관관계 분석에만 기반한 키워드 추천 방식은 두 키워드간의 단편적인 관계만을 알려줄 뿐, 해당 학술 분야와 관련된 전체 키워드 간의 복합적 연결 관계를 보여주기에는 한계가 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 연관관계 분석을 통해 빈발 출현 키워드 쌍을 추출하고 이를 근거로 전체 키워드 간 네트워크를 구축함으로써, 학술 분야별 중심 키워드 및 분야 간 융합을 위한 연계 키워드를 추천하기 위한 방법을 제시하고자 한다.

영어초록

The core service of most research portal sites is providing relevant research papers to various researchers that match their research interests. This kind of service may only be effective and easy to use when a user can provide correct and concrete information about a paper such as the title, authors, and keywords. However, unfortunately, most users of this service are not acquainted with concrete bibliographic information. It implies that most users inevitably experience repeated trial and error attempts of keyword‐based search. Especially, retrieving a relevant research paper is more difficult when a user is novice in the research domain and does not know appropriate keywords. In this case, a user should perform iterative searches as follows : i) perform an initial search with an arbitrary keyword, ii) acquire related keywords from the retrieved papers, and iii) perform another search again with the acquired keywords. This usage pattern implies that the level of service quality and user satisfaction of a portal site are strongly affected by the level of keyword management and searching mechanism.
To overcome this kind of inefficiency, some leading research portal sites adopt the association rule mining‐based keyword recommendation service that is similar to the product recommendation of online shopping malls. However, keyword recommendation only based on association analysis has limitation that it can show only a simple and direct relationship between two keywords. In other words, the association analysis itself is unable to present the complex relationships among many keywords in some adjacent research areas.
To overcome this limitation, we propose the hybrid approach for establishing association network among keywords used in research papers. The keyword association network can be established by the following phases : i) a set of keywords specified in a certain paper are regarded as co‐purchased items, ii) perform association analysis for the keywords and extract frequent patterns of keywords that satisfy predefined thresholds of confidence, support, and lift, and iii) schematize the frequent keyword patterns as a network to show the core keywords of each research area and connecting keywords among two or more research areas. To estimate the practical application of our approach, we performed a simple experiment with 600 keywords. The keywords are extracted from 131 research papers published in five prominent Korean journals in 2009. In the experiment, we used the SAS Enterprise Miner for association analysis and the R software for social network analysis. As the final outcome, we presented a network diagram and a cluster dendrogram for the keyword association network. We summarized the results in Section 4 of this paper.
The main contribution of our proposed approach can be found in the following aspects : i) the keyword network can provide an initial roadmap of a research area to researchers who are novice in the domain, ii) a researcher can grasp the distribution of many keywords neighboring to a certain keyword, and iii) researchers can get some idea for converging different research areas by observing connecting keywords in the keyword association network. Further studies should include the following. First, the current version of our approach does not implement a standard meta‐dictionary. For practical use, homonyms, synonyms, and multilingual problems should be resolved with a standard meta‐dictionary. Additionally, more clear guidelines for clustering research areas and defining core and connecting keywords should be provided. Finally, intensive experiments not only on Korean research papers but also on international papers should be performed in further studies.

참고자료

· 없음