건축물 경관심의의 질적 향상을 위한 평가항목 선정 (Selection of Evaluation Criteria to Improve the Quality of Building Landscape Review)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국생태환경건축학회
· 수록지 정보 : KIEAE Journal / 21권 / 2호 / 83 ~ 91페이지
· 저자명 : 송대석, 최주영, 이임정

초록

Purpose: We derived the evaluation criteria for building landscape review through a review of the preceding research, and set the main evaluation items for systematic and specific evaluation of the building landscape review targeting experts in each field as the purpose of the study. Method: We reviewed the research documents and checklists for the type and landscape review related to landscape planning, and the architectural landscape review, and reviewed the evaluation criteria of the building landscape. The reviewed criteria were gathered and then reclassified for any redundant and similar contents, and classified in detail according to the reviewed content.
Finally, we derived evaluation criteria by reorganizing the contents of the review criteria that were either ambiguous or comprehensive in detail. The derived evaluation criteria were collected through expert questionnaires, and the importance of building landscape evaluation criteria was analyzed using the SPSS 26.0 program. Result: As a result of the study, first, 18 viewpoints were set through expert questionnaires to establish specific and systematic guidelines for building landscape review. Second, if the 18 points of view that were set were classified by type in consideration of similar properties or characteristics according to the attributes of the view point, they were classified into four types: architectural plan, external space plan, outdoor advertisement, and night view. Third, the evaluation criteria corresponding to the architectural plan are set as 11 items, the evaluation criteria corresponding to the external space plan are set to 5 items, the evaluation criteria corresponding to outdoor advertisements are set to 1, and the evaluation criteria for the night scenery evaluation category is set to 1 item, so the evaluation criteria that are set the most are the evaluation criteria corresponding to the architectural plan. We expect these results will provide a framework for a systematic and reliable analysis in the future and be used as reference materials for architectural landscape reviews.

영어초록

Purpose: We derived the evaluation criteria for building landscape review through a review of the preceding research, and set the main evaluation items for systematic and specific evaluation of the building landscape review targeting experts in each field as the purpose of the study. Method: We reviewed the research documents and checklists for the type and landscape review related to landscape planning, and the architectural landscape review, and reviewed the evaluation criteria of the building landscape. The reviewed criteria were gathered and then reclassified for any redundant and similar contents, and classified in detail according to the reviewed content.
Finally, we derived evaluation criteria by reorganizing the contents of the review criteria that were either ambiguous or comprehensive in detail. The derived evaluation criteria were collected through expert questionnaires, and the importance of building landscape evaluation criteria was analyzed using the SPSS 26.0 program. Result: As a result of the study, first, 18 viewpoints were set through expert questionnaires to establish specific and systematic guidelines for building landscape review. Second, if the 18 points of view that were set were classified by type in consideration of similar properties or characteristics according to the attributes of the view point, they were classified into four types: architectural plan, external space plan, outdoor advertisement, and night view. Third, the evaluation criteria corresponding to the architectural plan are set as 11 items, the evaluation criteria corresponding to the external space plan are set to 5 items, the evaluation criteria corresponding to outdoor advertisements are set to 1, and the evaluation criteria for the night scenery evaluation category is set to 1 item, so the evaluation criteria that are set the most are the evaluation criteria corresponding to the architectural plan. We expect these results will provide a framework for a systematic and reliable analysis in the future and be used as reference materials for architectural landscape reviews.

참고자료

· 없음