읽기 교육에서 질적 연구에 관한 메타 분석 (The meta-analysis of qualitative research in reading education)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국어교육학회
· 수록지 정보 : 국어교육 / 144호 / 255 ~ 277페이지
· 저자명 : 김은주

초록

Teachers in schools and Korean language education researchers havebeen selecting either quantitative research or qualitative research andusing it depending on situation to diagnose and analyze the reality ofeducation, present teaching-learning method and expose their ownresearch subjects. Studies using qualitative research since 1990 have beenon the increase and the necessity of the studies has been discussing.
Reading is a large part of language use ability for high school studentsbut meaning forming process through reading is so invisible to the nakedeye that we can’t easily study it. Reading is a guessing game of sorts andthe sooner learners understand this game, the better off they are. The keyto successful guessing is to make it reasonably accurate. Qualitativeresearches are essential to conduct research on guessing occurring beforemaking final products such as speaking and writing and students’individual difference. According to this necessity, countless qualitativeresearches are coming out but I question whether these researches meetthe requirement of the validity as qualitative researches.
This manuscript analyzed 23 dissertations according to 3 standards(The in depth, circularity, integrity) based on the discussion about thevalidity of Lincoln & Guba(1985), 옥현진(2012), Creswell & Miller(2000). As a result of the analysis, it was found that, on the part of in-depthstudy, the description on the context of research was insufficient ,and onthe part of circularity, the level of applying the result of preliminaryresearch to this research or the level of participants’ opinion reflection wasinsufficient. On the part of integrity, what kinds of common features thevarious materials have when integrated into research result as well as tocollect various forms of materials as much as possible is important.
Therefore, this study shows not only qualitative research methods areproper approaches so as to explain students’ thinking process and itscontext but requirement that they have to get more validity as well. I canaccept the fact that preceding researches intended for this study soughtresearch methods having requirement in their way to expose researchsubjects but I am of the opinion that it is essential to think twice aboutmuch more accurate research methods. I strongly argue that this has beenaccomplished by thinking to improve the validity of reading process andproblem-solving strategies.

영어초록

Teachers in schools and Korean language education researchers havebeen selecting either quantitative research or qualitative research andusing it depending on situation to diagnose and analyze the reality ofeducation, present teaching-learning method and expose their ownresearch subjects. Studies using qualitative research since 1990 have beenon the increase and the necessity of the studies has been discussing.
Reading is a large part of language use ability for high school studentsbut meaning forming process through reading is so invisible to the nakedeye that we can’t easily study it. Reading is a guessing game of sorts andthe sooner learners understand this game, the better off they are. The keyto successful guessing is to make it reasonably accurate. Qualitativeresearches are essential to conduct research on guessing occurring beforemaking final products such as speaking and writing and students’individual difference. According to this necessity, countless qualitativeresearches are coming out but I question whether these researches meetthe requirement of the validity as qualitative researches.
This manuscript analyzed 23 dissertations according to 3 standards(The in depth, circularity, integrity) based on the discussion about thevalidity of Lincoln & Guba(1985), 옥현진(2012), Creswell & Miller(2000). As a result of the analysis, it was found that, on the part of in-depthstudy, the description on the context of research was insufficient ,and onthe part of circularity, the level of applying the result of preliminaryresearch to this research or the level of participants’ opinion reflection wasinsufficient. On the part of integrity, what kinds of common features thevarious materials have when integrated into research result as well as tocollect various forms of materials as much as possible is important.
Therefore, this study shows not only qualitative research methods areproper approaches so as to explain students’ thinking process and itscontext but requirement that they have to get more validity as well. I canaccept the fact that preceding researches intended for this study soughtresearch methods having requirement in their way to expose researchsubjects but I am of the opinion that it is essential to think twice aboutmuch more accurate research methods. I strongly argue that this has beenaccomplished by thinking to improve the validity of reading process andproblem-solving strategies.

참고자료

· 없음