• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

형법 제10조 제2항에 대한 비판적 고찰-비교법적 고찰을 통한 현행 제도에 대한 분석과 입법안의 검토 및 제안을 중심으로 - (The Critical Review on the Clause 2, the Article 10 of the Criminal Law -Focusing on the analysis for the present scheme through the comparative legal study, the review and the proposal of legislation)

40 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.29 최종저작일 2013.12
40P 미리보기
형법 제10조 제2항에 대한 비판적 고찰-비교법적 고찰을 통한 현행 제도에 대한 분석과 입법안의 검토 및 제안을 중심으로 -
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국형사법학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 형사법연구 / 25권 / 4호 / 33 ~ 72페이지
    · 저자명 : 권영법

    초록

    The theory of interpretation(de lege lata) and the theory of legislation(de lege fe-renda) for the Clause 2, the Article 10 of current Criminal Law mitigating thepunishment have been checked in case the responsibility is weak in this study. The development situation of the theory of interpretation in Germany and the p-recedent are analyzed, the diminished capacity scheme of USA similar to the li-mit of responsibility according to the mental and physical weakness is checkedand the diminished responsibility scheme of England is investigated prior to thi-s consideration. It reaches the recognition necessitating the flexible responsible m-itigation through this investigation. The concept of mental and physical disorder has been checked and the cause of mental and physical weakness has been Inv-estigated based on this understanding. The Supreme Court is not including the personality disorder, etc., in the mental disorder by adhering to the previous po-sition still even though there has been the change in the classification of mental disorder in the neuropsychiatry world. However, the personality disorder, the I-mpulse control disorder, the antisocial personality disorder all should be classifi-ed into the mental and physical disorder, the mental and physical weakness or not should be distinguished by judging if it is in the excited state at times of a-ction through the psychological analysis in case of action of passion. The judgm-ent of appraiser and the judgment of judge should be close, the concrete diagno-sis and the valuation creteria should be prepared by the reasonable method incl-uding the judgment standard for this and the judgment standard for the time of crime. The revised tentative plan has been investigated and the legislation bill h-as been presented based on this discussion. The mental and physical disorder in the current regulation is necessary to be classified into the mental disorder, the psychological disorder, the physical disorder; ‘the action owing to the damage o-f legal capacity at time of action has been caused’ should be clearly stated in t-he legislation bill. The mandatory mitigation and the discretionary mitigation are compromised for the flexible mitigation and the harmony of responsibility princi-ples, it may be reasonable for the discrimination to be placed based on the suit-ability or not. Even though there should be the legislative modification, the pre-paration of detailed criterion based on the medical diagnosis is urgent to evalua-te the mental and physical weakness reasonably; more concreted development of discussion shall have to be continued for the mental and physical weakness inthe future based on this alignment.

    영어초록

    The theory of interpretation(de lege lata) and the theory of legislation(de lege fe-renda) for the Clause 2, the Article 10 of current Criminal Law mitigating thepunishment have been checked in case the responsibility is weak in this study. The development situation of the theory of interpretation in Germany and the p-recedent are analyzed, the diminished capacity scheme of USA similar to the li-mit of responsibility according to the mental and physical weakness is checkedand the diminished responsibility scheme of England is investigated prior to thi-s consideration. It reaches the recognition necessitating the flexible responsible m-itigation through this investigation. The concept of mental and physical disorder has been checked and the cause of mental and physical weakness has been Inv-estigated based on this understanding. The Supreme Court is not including the personality disorder, etc., in the mental disorder by adhering to the previous po-sition still even though there has been the change in the classification of mental disorder in the neuropsychiatry world. However, the personality disorder, the I-mpulse control disorder, the antisocial personality disorder all should be classifi-ed into the mental and physical disorder, the mental and physical weakness or not should be distinguished by judging if it is in the excited state at times of a-ction through the psychological analysis in case of action of passion. The judgm-ent of appraiser and the judgment of judge should be close, the concrete diagno-sis and the valuation creteria should be prepared by the reasonable method incl-uding the judgment standard for this and the judgment standard for the time of crime. The revised tentative plan has been investigated and the legislation bill h-as been presented based on this discussion. The mental and physical disorder in the current regulation is necessary to be classified into the mental disorder, the psychological disorder, the physical disorder; ‘the action owing to the damage o-f legal capacity at time of action has been caused’ should be clearly stated in t-he legislation bill. The mandatory mitigation and the discretionary mitigation are compromised for the flexible mitigation and the harmony of responsibility princi-ples, it may be reasonable for the discrimination to be placed based on the suit-ability or not. Even though there should be the legislative modification, the pre-paration of detailed criterion based on the medical diagnosis is urgent to evalua-te the mental and physical weakness reasonably; more concreted development of discussion shall have to be continued for the mental and physical weakness inthe future based on this alignment.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“형사법연구”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • 전문가요청 배너
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 10월 19일 일요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
5:07 오전