Procuration system is defined to be an institution that another person presents or accepts an expression for the principal so that the effect of law happens on the principal.
In addition, in the case of representation of mandate, it is an expansion of private autonomy in the sense that one, with own intention, lets the third person commit a legal act and receives an effect. In the case of legal representation, the legal incompetent commits a valid legal act through a legal representative, and it has a function of supplementing private autonomy.
However, it can be considered as an expansion of private autonomy in the respect that it creates a legal effect to the principal, for the principal on the premise of the intention of the principal. Merely, in the case of legal representation, it is considered to be different because the right of representation is granted under the law. All procuration system should not deviate from this original and characteristic.
It is called an abuse of the right of representation when a representative works for himself or the third person, not for the principal who entrusts the right of representation. A number of theories exist for the case that the representative's action which corresponds to this happens.
On the other hand, it causes another problem if procuration system, which is administered within a certain system, is able to fail to speak for the principal's opinion and profit. Procuration system is not always such in charter procedure, but it is considered somewhat meaningful because there exists a very unique phase, which is hardly found in general administration of procuration system.
Charter procedure is commonly the most complicated among the administrative procedures, so the procuration system upon it seems to have a very peculiar characteristic. Other than the basic point that procuration system is managed for the principal himself, there might be various purposes such as stabilization of foreign relationship, effective management of related procedures, and etc.
On charter procedure, procuration procedure seems to excessively emphasize the effectiveness of administrative procedure, among those several purposes. It is seen from the considerable amount of contents managed in charter procedure, other than the same points with civil law and the Civil Proceedings Act.Especially, about the management of comprehensive mandate system and appointment of sub-agent, the system is thought to be working for the comfort of representative more than for the effectiveness of procedure.Also, not a few of the contents, which regulate the unique produration system about charter procedure, are managed only with the basis related to the enforcement regulation format.
Although it does not mean that these respect aught to be prescribed under the law, it needs a change, considering the fact that the recent tendency of legislation is trying to arrange legal basis as much as possible.
Also, a problem of interpretation occurred while trying to include excessively complicated procedural term as a regulation.Though this originates in the complexity that the charter procedure carries, it is also a problem of legislation technology. Due to this kind of vagueness on regulations, the guidelines, which are only internal manuals, are sometimes understood as a bible. It needs to be stipulated more clearly. A national recognition of charter procedure is that it is difficult and complicated. Of course it is to create a new right by a certain procedure; therefore, it might be more complicated than other administrative procedures.
However, it needs to be considered that the complexity originates from the systematic defect under management. About the charter procedure, procuration system is administered uniquely, and at some point, it needs to grope for more constructive plan for people. Further details are to be examined and learned, but some issues can be discussed as indications.
First, it needs an improvement of unnecessary regulations whose meanings are hazy. They are the warrant of attorney and the assignment report that are provided under patent law enforcement regulation article 5 and the terms, related to the representative of multiple parties, provided under the patent law article 11.The former is judged to cause unnecessary administrative procedures without a distinguished actual profit, and the latter is capable of inducing confusion due to the vagueness of its contents; therefore, there needs to be a revision of text.
Second, the articles, which are managed with excessive focus on the representative, needs to be improved to focus on the principal. Of course, although the representative is too big and his comfort can result in the benefit of principal due to the characteristics of administrative procedure, it needs to be improved because, eventually, the most important term is the intention of the principal in procuration system. The comprehensive mandate system is the typical term, and it is necessary to arrange a procedure to check the principal's intention even in simple format.On the other hand, the matters, related to the appointment of sub-agent about the corporate which himself belongs to, must be improved in the respect that certain matters might occur, inharmonious with or violating the patent law or patent attorney act. It should be solved with the replacement of representative, like a commonsense case.
Third, there needs a legal basis about some subjects related to the procuration system. Especially, comprehensive mandate system, related to the appointment of sub-agent about the corporate which himself belongs to, needs a legal basis about the contents including the least definition of concepts.
As consistently mentioned, procuration system is managed for the principal; at the same time, it is also a problem that the credit and control over the representative comes together. That is the reason why there exist regulations under the law so that the system can be administered, corresponding with the original purpose. In this sense, procuration system suggests many issues about the patent law. Even though this is an insufficient paper, I hope that the procuration system would approach to the original function and purpose in the patent system.
영어초록
Procuration system is defined to be an institution that another person presents or accepts an expression for the principal so that the effect of law happens on the principal.
In addition, in the case of representation of mandate, it is an expansion of private autonomy in the sense that one, with own intention, lets the third person commit a legal act and receives an effect. In the case of legal representation, the legal incompetent commits a valid legal act through a legal representative, and it has a function of supplementing private autonomy.
However, it can be considered as an expansion of private autonomy in the respect that it creates a legal effect to the principal, for the principal on the premise of the intention of the principal. Merely, in the case of legal representation, it is considered to be different because the right of representation is granted under the law. All procuration system should not deviate from this original and characteristic.
It is called an abuse of the right of representation when a representative works for himself or the third person, not for the principal who entrusts the right of representation. A number of theories exist for the case that the representative's action which corresponds to this happens.
On the other hand, it causes another problem if procuration system, which is administered within a certain system, is able to fail to speak for the principal's opinion and profit. Procuration system is not always such in charter procedure, but it is considered somewhat meaningful because there exists a very unique phase, which is hardly found in general administration of procuration system.
Charter procedure is commonly the most complicated among the administrative procedures, so the procuration system upon it seems to have a very peculiar characteristic. Other than the basic point that procuration system is managed for the principal himself, there might be various purposes such as stabilization of foreign relationship, effective management of related procedures, and etc.
On charter procedure, procuration procedure seems to excessively emphasize the effectiveness of administrative procedure, among those several purposes. It is seen from the considerable amount of contents managed in charter procedure, other than the same points with civil law and the Civil Proceedings Act.Especially, about the management of comprehensive mandate system and appointment of sub-agent, the system is thought to be working for the comfort of representative more than for the effectiveness of procedure.Also, not a few of the contents, which regulate the unique produration system about charter procedure, are managed only with the basis related to the enforcement regulation format.
Although it does not mean that these respect aught to be prescribed under the law, it needs a change, considering the fact that the recent tendency of legislation is trying to arrange legal basis as much as possible.
Also, a problem of interpretation occurred while trying to include excessively complicated procedural term as a regulation.Though this originates in the complexity that the charter procedure carries, it is also a problem of legislation technology. Due to this kind of vagueness on regulations, the guidelines, which are only internal manuals, are sometimes understood as a bible. It needs to be stipulated more clearly. A national recognition of charter procedure is that it is difficult and complicated. Of course it is to create a new right by a certain procedure; therefore, it might be more complicated than other administrative procedures.
However, it needs to be considered that the complexity originates from the systematic defect under management. About the charter procedure, procuration system is administered uniquely, and at some point, it needs to grope for more constructive plan for people. Further details are to be examined and learned, but some issues can be discussed as indications.
First, it needs an improvement of unnecessary regulations whose meanings are hazy. They are the warrant of attorney and the assignment report that are provided under patent law enforcement regulation article 5 and the terms, related to the representative of multiple parties, provided under the patent law article 11.The former is judged to cause unnecessary administrative procedures without a distinguished actual profit, and the latter is capable of inducing confusion due to the vagueness of its contents; therefore, there needs to be a revision of text.
Second, the articles, which are managed with excessive focus on the representative, needs to be improved to focus on the principal. Of course, although the representative is too big and his comfort can result in the benefit of principal due to the characteristics of administrative procedure, it needs to be improved because, eventually, the most important term is the intention of the principal in procuration system. The comprehensive mandate system is the typical term, and it is necessary to arrange a procedure to check the principal's intention even in simple format.On the other hand, the matters, related to the appointment of sub-agent about the corporate which himself belongs to, must be improved in the respect that certain matters might occur, inharmonious with or violating the patent law or patent attorney act. It should be solved with the replacement of representative, like a commonsense case.
Third, there needs a legal basis about some subjects related to the procuration system. Especially, comprehensive mandate system, related to the appointment of sub-agent about the corporate which himself belongs to, needs a legal basis about the contents including the least definition of concepts.
As consistently mentioned, procuration system is managed for the principal; at the same time, it is also a problem that the credit and control over the representative comes together. That is the reason why there exist regulations under the law so that the system can be administered, corresponding with the original purpose. In this sense, procuration system suggests many issues about the patent law. Even though this is an insufficient paper, I hope that the procuration system would approach to the original function and purpose in the patent system.
해피캠퍼스에서는 자료의 구매 및 판매 기타 사이트 이용과 관련된 서비스는 제공되지만, 자료내용과 관련된 구체적인 정보는 안내가 어렵습니다.
자료에 대해 궁금한 내용은 판매자에게 직접 게시판을 통해 문의하실 수 있습니다.
1. [내계정→마이페이지→내자료→구매자료] 에서 [자료문의]
2. 자료 상세페이지 [자료문의]
자료문의는 공개/비공개로 설정하여 접수가 가능하며 접수됨과 동시에 자료 판매자에게 이메일과 알림톡으로 전송 됩니다.
판매자가 문의내용을 확인하여 답변을 작성하기까지 시간이 지연될 수 있습니다.
※ 휴대폰번호 또는 이메일과 같은 개인정보 입력은 자제해 주세요.
※ 다운로드가 되지 않는 등 서비스 불편사항은 고객센터 1:1 문의하기를 이용해주세요.
찾으시는 자료는 이미 작성이 완료된 상태로 판매 중에 있으며 검색기능을 이용하여 자료를 직접 검색해야 합니다.
1. 자료 검색 시에는 전체 문장을 입력하여 먼저 확인하시고
검색결과에 자료가 나오지 않는다면 핵심 검색어만 입력해 보세요.
연관성 있는 더 많은 자료를 검색결과에서 확인할 수 있습니다.
※ 검색결과가 너무 많다면? 카테고리, 기간, 파일형식 등을 선택하여 검색결과를 한 번 더 정리해 보세요.
2. 검색결과의 제목을 클릭하면 자료의 상세페이지를 확인할 수 있습니다.
썸네일(자료구성), 페이지수, 저작일, 가격 등 자료의 상세정보를 확인하실 수 있으며 소개글, 목차, 본문내용, 참고문헌도 미리 확인하실 수 있습니다.
검색기능을 잘 활용하여 원하시는 자료를 다운로드 하세요
자료는 저작권이 본인에게 있고 저작권에 문제가 없는 자료라면 판매가 가능합니다.
해피캠퍼스 메인 우측상단 [내계정]→[마이페이지]→[내자료]→[자료 개별등록] 버튼을 클릭해 주세요.
◎ 자료등록 순서는?
자료 등록 1단계 : 판매자 본인인증
자료 등록 2단계 : 서약서 및 저작권 규정 동의
서약서와 저작권 규정에 동의하신 후 일괄 혹은 개별 등록 버튼을 눌러 자료등록을 시작합니다.
①[일괄 등록] : 여러 개의 파일을 올리실 때 편리합니다.
②[개별 등록] : 1건의 자료를 올리실 때 이용하며, 직접 목차와 본문을 입력하실 때 유용합니다.
자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
파일오류
중복자료
저작권 없음
설명과 실제 내용 불일치
파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우
행정소송상 집행정지의 대상적격
24 페이지
