조선전기 종묘 ‘同堂異室制’의 비판과 重建논쟁 (A study of Criticism on Chongmyo's Dongdangisilje and its Rebuilding during the first half of Choson dynasty)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 고려사학회
· 수록지 정보 : 韓國史學報 / 36호 / 9 ~ 42페이지
· 저자명 : 한형주

초록

The purpose of this study is to research rites consciousness of
Neo-Confucian literati through Royal Ancestral Shrine(Chongmyo)
Rebuilding debate which occurred during the 40th year of King
Seonjo's reign.
The Chongmyo is built in the 4th year of King Taejo, based on
Five Graves System(Omyoje) according to vassal state level. It
imitated Dongdangisilje(同堂異室制), the style of all king's tablets are
arrayed in a long building side by side, which has been in effect
since the Han dynasty, instead of ancient system of Chou dynasty.
On the contrary, Munsojeon, where only the dynastic founder King
Taejo and his four direct forefathers were enshrined, consisted of
two separated building according to ancient system of Chou dynasty
where only five generation tablets was supposed to be posted
exclusively.
In 1495, as King Jeongjong and King Taejong went over five
generation, wide-ranging debates of tablet rearrangement came
along. At that time, some of officials argued that building of the
Sesilmyo, which was extra tomb of the tablets of kings who had
achieved remarkable virtues, should be considered seriously to
enshrine those kings eternally. Since Sesilmyo was part of ancient
Chou system of Royal Ancestral Shrine, this was meant to change
existing Chongmyo system into more fundamental version, and this
was rejected. And during of early Seonjo period, Lee Hwang insisted
that the arrangement of ancestral tablets in Munsojeon must be
changed according to Somokje(The order in which the ancestral
tablets were enshrined according to distance of generation), when
the Hyupje(祫祭) was executed. This argument was also based on
ancient Chou system was rejected, too.
In the process of Japanese Invasion in 1592, the Chongmyo was
destroyed by japanese soldiers. After the end of the war, King
Seonjo planned Chongmyo's Rebuilding in order to reestablish his
kingship which was disdained during the war. Then, the Confucian
elites insisted that king should carry out ancient royal ancestral
shrine system of Chou dynasty according to Chu Hŭi's opinion: that
is, separate construction of Taejomyo, Sesilmyo, Somyo, Mokmyo
and each tomb consisting of Jeonjeon-Huchim(前殿後寢). However,
this was rejected too because the expansion of Chongmyo was
thought to require enormous amount of money and effort and
Chosŏn's own old tradition was thought as something that could not
converted in a day.
Two years later, rebuilding the Chongmyo is completed. And it
was merely a reconstruction of early Chosŏn's Chongmyo system.
After all, Confucian ruling elites' idealistic reformation of Confucian
rites through Chongmyo‘s reconstruction came to pieces by practical
standpoint.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to research rites consciousness of
Neo-Confucian literati through Royal Ancestral Shrine(Chongmyo)
Rebuilding debate which occurred during the 40th year of King
Seonjo's reign.
The Chongmyo is built in the 4th year of King Taejo, based on
Five Graves System(Omyoje) according to vassal state level. It
imitated Dongdangisilje(同堂異室制), the style of all king's tablets are
arrayed in a long building side by side, which has been in effect
since the Han dynasty, instead of ancient system of Chou dynasty.
On the contrary, Munsojeon, where only the dynastic founder King
Taejo and his four direct forefathers were enshrined, consisted of
two separated building according to ancient system of Chou dynasty
where only five generation tablets was supposed to be posted
exclusively.
In 1495, as King Jeongjong and King Taejong went over five
generation, wide-ranging debates of tablet rearrangement came
along. At that time, some of officials argued that building of the
Sesilmyo, which was extra tomb of the tablets of kings who had
achieved remarkable virtues, should be considered seriously to
enshrine those kings eternally. Since Sesilmyo was part of ancient
Chou system of Royal Ancestral Shrine, this was meant to change
existing Chongmyo system into more fundamental version, and this
was rejected. And during of early Seonjo period, Lee Hwang insisted
that the arrangement of ancestral tablets in Munsojeon must be
changed according to Somokje(The order in which the ancestral
tablets were enshrined according to distance of generation), when
the Hyupje(祫祭) was executed. This argument was also based on
ancient Chou system was rejected, too.
In the process of Japanese Invasion in 1592, the Chongmyo was
destroyed by japanese soldiers. After the end of the war, King
Seonjo planned Chongmyo's Rebuilding in order to reestablish his
kingship which was disdained during the war. Then, the Confucian
elites insisted that king should carry out ancient royal ancestral
shrine system of Chou dynasty according to Chu Hŭi's opinion: that
is, separate construction of Taejomyo, Sesilmyo, Somyo, Mokmyo
and each tomb consisting of Jeonjeon-Huchim(前殿後寢). However,
this was rejected too because the expansion of Chongmyo was
thought to require enormous amount of money and effort and
Chosŏn's own old tradition was thought as something that could not
converted in a day.
Two years later, rebuilding the Chongmyo is completed. And it
was merely a reconstruction of early Chosŏn's Chongmyo system.
After all, Confucian ruling elites' idealistic reformation of Confucian
rites through Chongmyo‘s reconstruction came to pieces by practical
standpoint.

참고자료

· 없음