• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

Market Structure Analysis of Automobile Market in U.S.A (Market Structure Analysis of Automobile Market in U.S.A)

16 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.21 최종저작일 2008.03
16P 미리보기
Market Structure Analysis of Automobile Market in U.S.A
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국마케팅과학회
    · 수록지 정보 : Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구) / 18권 / 1호 / 141 ~ 156페이지
    · 저자명 : 최인혜, 이서구, 이성근

    초록

    Market structure analysis is a very useful tool to analyze the competition boundary of
    the brand or the company. But most of the studies in market structure analysis, the
    concern lies in nondurable goods such as candies, soft drink and etc. because of the their
    availability of the data. In the field of durable goods, the limitation of the data availability
    and the repurchase time period constrain the study. In the analysis of the automobile
    market, those of views might be more persuasive.
    The purpose of this study is to analyze the structure of automobile market based on
    some idea suggested by prior studies. Usually the buyers of the automobile tend to buy
    upper tier when they buy in the next time. That kind of behavior make it impossible to
    analyze the structure of automobile market under the level of automobile model. For that
    reason I tried to analyze the market structure in the brand or company level.
    In this study, consideration data was used for market structure analysis. The reasons
    why we used the consideration data are summarized as following. Firstly, as the
    repurchase time cycle is too long, brand switching data which is used for the market
    analysis of nondurable good is not avaliable. Secondly, as we mentioned, the buyers of
    the automobile tend to buy upper tier when they buy in the next time.
    We used survey data collected in the U.S.A. market in the year of 2005 through
    questionaire. The sample size was 8,291. The number of brand analyzed in this study
    was 9 among 37 which was being sold in U.S.A. market. Their market share was around
    50%. The brands considered were BMW, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, Honda,
    Mercedes, and Toyota.  ratio was derived from frequency of the consideration set.
    Actually the frequency is different from the brand switch concept. In this study to
    compute the  ratio, the frequency of the consideration set was used like a frequency of brand switch for convenience.
    The study can be divided into 2 steps. The first step is to build hypothetical market
    structures. The second step is to choose the best structure based on the hypothetical
    market structures, Usually logit analysis is used for the choice best structure.
    In this study we built 3 hypothetical market structure. They are type-cost, cost-type,
    and unstructured. We classified the automobile into 5 types, sedan, SUV(Sport Utility
    Vehicle), Pickup, Mini Van, and Full-size Van. As for purchasing cost, we classified it 2
    groups based on the median value. The median value was $28,800.
    To decide best structure among them, maximum likelihood test was used. Resulting
    from market structure analysis, we find that the automobile market of USA is
    hierarchically structured in the form of 'automobile type - purchasing cost'. That is,
    result showed that automobile buyers considered function or usage first and purchasing
    cost next.
    This study has some limitations in the analysis level and variable selection. First, in
    this study only type of the automobile and purchasing cost were as attributes considered
    for purchase. Considering other attributes is very needful. Because of the attributes
    considered, only 3 hypothetical structure could be analyzed. Second, due to the data,
    brand level analysis was tried. But model level analysis would be better because
    automobile buyers consider model not brand. To conduct model level study more cases
    should be obtained. That is for acquiring the better practical meaning, brand level
    analysis should be conducted when we consider the actual competition which occurred in
    the real market. Third, the variable selection for building nested logit model was very
    limited to some avaliable data. In spite of those limitations, the importance of this study
    lies in the trial of market structure analysis of durable good.

    영어초록

    Market structure analysis is a very useful tool to analyze the competition boundary of
    the brand or the company. But most of the studies in market structure analysis, the
    concern lies in nondurable goods such as candies, soft drink and etc. because of the their
    availability of the data. In the field of durable goods, the limitation of the data availability
    and the repurchase time period constrain the study. In the analysis of the automobile
    market, those of views might be more persuasive.
    The purpose of this study is to analyze the structure of automobile market based on
    some idea suggested by prior studies. Usually the buyers of the automobile tend to buy
    upper tier when they buy in the next time. That kind of behavior make it impossible to
    analyze the structure of automobile market under the level of automobile model. For that
    reason I tried to analyze the market structure in the brand or company level.
    In this study, consideration data was used for market structure analysis. The reasons
    why we used the consideration data are summarized as following. Firstly, as the
    repurchase time cycle is too long, brand switching data which is used for the market
    analysis of nondurable good is not avaliable. Secondly, as we mentioned, the buyers of
    the automobile tend to buy upper tier when they buy in the next time.
    We used survey data collected in the U.S.A. market in the year of 2005 through
    questionaire. The sample size was 8,291. The number of brand analyzed in this study
    was 9 among 37 which was being sold in U.S.A. market. Their market share was around
    50%. The brands considered were BMW, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, Honda,
    Mercedes, and Toyota.  ratio was derived from frequency of the consideration set.
    Actually the frequency is different from the brand switch concept. In this study to
    compute the  ratio, the frequency of the consideration set was used like a frequency of brand switch for convenience.
    The study can be divided into 2 steps. The first step is to build hypothetical market
    structures. The second step is to choose the best structure based on the hypothetical
    market structures, Usually logit analysis is used for the choice best structure.
    In this study we built 3 hypothetical market structure. They are type-cost, cost-type,
    and unstructured. We classified the automobile into 5 types, sedan, SUV(Sport Utility
    Vehicle), Pickup, Mini Van, and Full-size Van. As for purchasing cost, we classified it 2
    groups based on the median value. The median value was $28,800.
    To decide best structure among them, maximum likelihood test was used. Resulting
    from market structure analysis, we find that the automobile market of USA is
    hierarchically structured in the form of 'automobile type - purchasing cost'. That is,
    result showed that automobile buyers considered function or usage first and purchasing
    cost next.
    This study has some limitations in the analysis level and variable selection. First, in
    this study only type of the automobile and purchasing cost were as attributes considered
    for purchase. Considering other attributes is very needful. Because of the attributes
    considered, only 3 hypothetical structure could be analyzed. Second, due to the data,
    brand level analysis was tried. But model level analysis would be better because
    automobile buyers consider model not brand. To conduct model level study more cases
    should be obtained. That is for acquiring the better practical meaning, brand level
    analysis should be conducted when we consider the actual competition which occurred in
    the real market. Third, the variable selection for building nested logit model was very
    limited to some avaliable data. In spite of those limitations, the importance of this study
    lies in the trial of market structure analysis of durable good.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 01월 08일 목요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
1:44 오후