근대시 연구의 새로운 지평―전통주의적 연구를 중심으로 (New Trend in the Study of Modern Korean Poetry)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 현대문학이론학회
· 수록지 정보 : 현대문학이론연구 / 33호 / 5 ~ 32페이지
· 저자명 : 박현수

초록

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the notion and present state of traditionalist research in the study of Korean poetry. In this paper, traditionalist research means a study which to search out new notions and paradigms of discourse in Korean traditional thought and to apply to the study of modern Korean poetry by creative interpretation of those.
Closely looking into traditionalist studies, there are five categories; general conceptual, Buddhist, Taoist, neo-Confucianist, Korean fundamental philosophic study. General conceptual study, based on traditional philosophic concepts in the history of Korean thought, was conducted by Yun Jae-geun, Kim Young-seok and Choi Seung-ho. Buddhist study, by Song Uk, Taoist study, by Lee Seonghee and Kim Kyoung-bog, neo-Confucianist study, by Jo Dong-il and Park Hyeon-su, and Korean fundamental philosophic study, by Seo Jeong-ju, Shin Beom-sun and Kim Ji-ha.
Though these studies, in the making process, had some blurs in logical refinement, they have very important significance in Korean literary study in that, they tried to find a new and creative theory. It is also worthy to note that traditionalist studies brought a change in the study of Korean literature subordinated every discourse of Korean literature to the western theory.

영어초록

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the notion and present state of traditionalist research in the study of Korean poetry. In this paper, traditionalist research means a study which to search out new notions and paradigms of discourse in Korean traditional thought and to apply to the study of modern Korean poetry by creative interpretation of those.
Closely looking into traditionalist studies, there are five categories; general conceptual, Buddhist, Taoist, neo-Confucianist, Korean fundamental philosophic study. General conceptual study, based on traditional philosophic concepts in the history of Korean thought, was conducted by Yun Jae-geun, Kim Young-seok and Choi Seung-ho. Buddhist study, by Song Uk, Taoist study, by Lee Seonghee and Kim Kyoung-bog, neo-Confucianist study, by Jo Dong-il and Park Hyeon-su, and Korean fundamental philosophic study, by Seo Jeong-ju, Shin Beom-sun and Kim Ji-ha.
Though these studies, in the making process, had some blurs in logical refinement, they have very important significance in Korean literary study in that, they tried to find a new and creative theory. It is also worthy to note that traditionalist studies brought a change in the study of Korean literature subordinated every discourse of Korean literature to the western theory.

참고자료

· 없음