• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

20세기 초 天津審判廳과 中ㆍ外 교섭재판 (Tianjin court and Sino-foreign mixed trials in the early 20th century)

29 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.14 최종저작일 2024.06
29P 미리보기
20세기 초 天津審判廳과 中ㆍ外 교섭재판
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 중국근현대사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 중국근현대사연구 / 102호 / 81 ~ 109페이지
    · 저자명 : 조병식

    초록

    Tianjin Court was the first new-style court established during the New Policy at the end of the Qing Dynasty, and one of its main purposes being the restoration the ‘extraterritorial jurisdiction’ exercised by foreigners. Among the ‘extraterritorial jurisdictions’ that existed in modern China, this article focused on the mixed trials between Chinses(defendants) and foreigners(plaintiff), and examined the changes brought by the construction of Tianjin Court and its characteristics.
    The mixed cases in Tianjin were primarily commecial disputes. Before the establishment of the Tianjin court, such cases were handled by the Tianjin magistrate. However, due to foreigners' negative perception of the traiditional Chinse judicial system and its inherent limitations, mixed tirals were not efficiently conducted. Consequently, the consulates in Tianjin demanded to establish a mixed court exclusively for handling such cases. In response to this demand, the Zhili Governor-Genral and the director of Tianjin maritime customs sought various solutions, and eventually deciding to construct a western-sytle court, Tianjin court.
    The most significant change that occured was the institutionalization of the mixed trials. The mixed trials conducted by Tianjin court combined the western systems with traditional Chinese methods, thereby improving foreigners' satisfaction with mixed trial and increasing their confidence in the Chinese judiciary.
    The institutionalization of the mixed trial led to an increase in the number of foreign merchants suing directly in Tianjin court, bypassing their consulates. Tianjin court followed established rules and procedures for conducting the mixed trials, and dealt with Chinese defendants in accordance with ‘Chinese law’. Furthermore, as seen in the case of the Firm of Betram(志誠洋行), Tianjin court resisted the German diplomats' attempt to intervene the trial on the basis of treaties and general legal principles. In short, Tianjin court conducted the mixed trials as a new style court, which was in line with the ultimate purpose, the protection of judicial sovereignty.

    영어초록

    Tianjin Court was the first new-style court established during the New Policy at the end of the Qing Dynasty, and one of its main purposes being the restoration the ‘extraterritorial jurisdiction’ exercised by foreigners. Among the ‘extraterritorial jurisdictions’ that existed in modern China, this article focused on the mixed trials between Chinses(defendants) and foreigners(plaintiff), and examined the changes brought by the construction of Tianjin Court and its characteristics.
    The mixed cases in Tianjin were primarily commecial disputes. Before the establishment of the Tianjin court, such cases were handled by the Tianjin magistrate. However, due to foreigners' negative perception of the traiditional Chinse judicial system and its inherent limitations, mixed tirals were not efficiently conducted. Consequently, the consulates in Tianjin demanded to establish a mixed court exclusively for handling such cases. In response to this demand, the Zhili Governor-Genral and the director of Tianjin maritime customs sought various solutions, and eventually deciding to construct a western-sytle court, Tianjin court.
    The most significant change that occured was the institutionalization of the mixed trials. The mixed trials conducted by Tianjin court combined the western systems with traditional Chinese methods, thereby improving foreigners' satisfaction with mixed trial and increasing their confidence in the Chinese judiciary.
    The institutionalization of the mixed trial led to an increase in the number of foreign merchants suing directly in Tianjin court, bypassing their consulates. Tianjin court followed established rules and procedures for conducting the mixed trials, and dealt with Chinese defendants in accordance with ‘Chinese law’. Furthermore, as seen in the case of the Firm of Betram(志誠洋行), Tianjin court resisted the German diplomats' attempt to intervene the trial on the basis of treaties and general legal principles. In short, Tianjin court conducted the mixed trials as a new style court, which was in line with the ultimate purpose, the protection of judicial sovereignty.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • EasyAI 무료체험
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 10월 11일 토요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
2:01 오후