• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

정신분석학에서 본 추의 기원과 현대미술: 프로이트, 라깡을 중심으로 (The Origin of Ugliness(Non-the Aesthetic) in the Psychoanalysis and Modern Art : focusing on Freud and Lacan)

36 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.05.14 최종저작일 2008.06
36P 미리보기
정신분석학에서 본 추의 기원과 현대미술: 프로이트, 라깡을 중심으로
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국미학예술학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 미학예술학연구 / 27권 / 159 ~ 194페이지
    · 저자명 : 남인숙

    초록

    In this work ‘Ugliness’ broadly refer to non-the aesthetic which there is no place in traditional aesthetics. But it means a kind of the aesthetic concerning modern and contemporary arts. Because they have provoked crucial question transgressing the traditional criterion of art. ‘The origin[of ugliness(Non-the Aesthetic]’ does not result from diachronic approach but synchronical in this paper. That is to say, ‘the origin of Ugliness(Non-the aesthetic)’ lies on a structure which setoff the psychic life in the psychoanalysis. This paper leads to reveal iso-structure between the structure and the origin of the Ugliness(non-the aesthetic) in the psychoanalysis. And then it could be a theoretical support for modern and contemporary arts.
    Commonly it is believed that traditionally western aesthetics has thought of the beauty as ideal form in the field of aesthetic and the pleasure as subjective response regarding as the beauty since Plato. Symmetry, proportion and decorum etc. are the objective criterion of the ideal form. So the Ugliness or non-the aesthetic has undervalued with * Ph. D. candidate and lecturer of Hongik University
    This work was supported by 2006 Hong-Ik University research fund. unpleasure, asymmetry, night(there is no light), ugliness(there is nothing the beauty) so on. But nowadays there are many hundreds of arts which consist in materials, forms as variable as possible. It is impossible to categorize them several ways because of appearance that are scattered, fragmented, non-articulated, shocked and culminated at random.
    Actually we faced to the problem that explains comtemporary art at any ways. Psychoanalysis lights on the problem that will research an explanation about modern and comtemporary arts. To approach the problem, above all, I analyze that ‘Spaltung and Méconnaissance’ are the structural origin and ‘Angst and Trieb’ are the affective origin of psychic life in the psychoanalysis focusing on Freud and Lacan. And then, showing how an artwork is related with ‘Méconnaissance and Spaltung’, ‘Angst and Trieb’, the structure as ‘the origin’ is the cause to symbolize something that Lacanian term is ‘the real’ at the same time the origin is the result to make up an artwork that symbolizes something. Hence in psychoanalysis, an artwork as a cause-object is necessary related the structure of the origin in the psychic life or [unconscious] psychoanalytic subject. To reveal the relation between the psychoanalytic origin and the artwork, I analyze the artwork, <Le Bar aux Folies-Bergère>. In short, through the analysis, to conclude: the Angst is the fundamental affekt which is the subject symbolizing something and the Méconnaissance is the fundamental structure in the imaginary which the subject aggressively longing on the other as imago. These fundamental instance roles the cause-object in the modern and contemporary arts. So with psychoanalysis we can prospect to explain something like that scattered, shocked and fragmented body, consistently floating or disappearing image[Ding or le réel].

    영어초록

    In this work ‘Ugliness’ broadly refer to non-the aesthetic which there is no place in traditional aesthetics. But it means a kind of the aesthetic concerning modern and contemporary arts. Because they have provoked crucial question transgressing the traditional criterion of art. ‘The origin[of ugliness(Non-the Aesthetic]’ does not result from diachronic approach but synchronical in this paper. That is to say, ‘the origin of Ugliness(Non-the aesthetic)’ lies on a structure which setoff the psychic life in the psychoanalysis. This paper leads to reveal iso-structure between the structure and the origin of the Ugliness(non-the aesthetic) in the psychoanalysis. And then it could be a theoretical support for modern and contemporary arts.
    Commonly it is believed that traditionally western aesthetics has thought of the beauty as ideal form in the field of aesthetic and the pleasure as subjective response regarding as the beauty since Plato. Symmetry, proportion and decorum etc. are the objective criterion of the ideal form. So the Ugliness or non-the aesthetic has undervalued with * Ph. D. candidate and lecturer of Hongik University
    This work was supported by 2006 Hong-Ik University research fund. unpleasure, asymmetry, night(there is no light), ugliness(there is nothing the beauty) so on. But nowadays there are many hundreds of arts which consist in materials, forms as variable as possible. It is impossible to categorize them several ways because of appearance that are scattered, fragmented, non-articulated, shocked and culminated at random.
    Actually we faced to the problem that explains comtemporary art at any ways. Psychoanalysis lights on the problem that will research an explanation about modern and comtemporary arts. To approach the problem, above all, I analyze that ‘Spaltung and Méconnaissance’ are the structural origin and ‘Angst and Trieb’ are the affective origin of psychic life in the psychoanalysis focusing on Freud and Lacan. And then, showing how an artwork is related with ‘Méconnaissance and Spaltung’, ‘Angst and Trieb’, the structure as ‘the origin’ is the cause to symbolize something that Lacanian term is ‘the real’ at the same time the origin is the result to make up an artwork that symbolizes something. Hence in psychoanalysis, an artwork as a cause-object is necessary related the structure of the origin in the psychic life or [unconscious] psychoanalytic subject. To reveal the relation between the psychoanalytic origin and the artwork, I analyze the artwork, <Le Bar aux Folies-Bergère>. In short, through the analysis, to conclude: the Angst is the fundamental affekt which is the subject symbolizing something and the Méconnaissance is the fundamental structure in the imaginary which the subject aggressively longing on the other as imago. These fundamental instance roles the cause-object in the modern and contemporary arts. So with psychoanalysis we can prospect to explain something like that scattered, shocked and fragmented body, consistently floating or disappearing image[Ding or le réel].

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 04월 02일 목요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
2:16 오후