유체해석 방법별에 따른 배수관망시스템 분석 (Analysis of the Pipe Network System on the each Fluid Analysis Method)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국수처리학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국수처리학회지 / 16권 / 4호 / 97 ~ 110페이지
· 저자명 : 최광현, 최윤영

초록

In this study, optimal analysis of pipe network is performed using fluid analysis methods(EPANET Model) for complex real pipe network system of Daeso distribution reservoir which is consisted of 65 junctions and 75 pipelines.
It is found that C-M method provides the small amount while H-W and D-W method provide the almost same amount from the result of the examination of the total supply distributed to each pipelines in the analysis of the distribution system. and C-M method has relatively large range of supply variation while H-W and D-W method have similar pattern in general. It is shown that C-M, D-W and H-W method are arranged according to the size of head loss and the pressure which is the important factor of design in analysis of distribution system is examined for each method, therefore it is appeared that H-W, D-W and C-M method are arranged in the order of size. And in comparison with the pressure standard(2～5㎏/㎠) which is proposed in the guidelines of Daeso distribution reservoir, the accuracies of the computation are shown in order of H-W, D-W and C-M method.

영어초록

In this study, optimal analysis of pipe network is performed using fluid analysis methods(EPANET Model) for complex real pipe network system of Daeso distribution reservoir which is consisted of 65 junctions and 75 pipelines.
It is found that C-M method provides the small amount while H-W and D-W method provide the almost same amount from the result of the examination of the total supply distributed to each pipelines in the analysis of the distribution system. and C-M method has relatively large range of supply variation while H-W and D-W method have similar pattern in general. It is shown that C-M, D-W and H-W method are arranged according to the size of head loss and the pressure which is the important factor of design in analysis of distribution system is examined for each method, therefore it is appeared that H-W, D-W and C-M method are arranged in the order of size. And in comparison with the pressure standard(2～5㎏/㎠) which is proposed in the guidelines of Daeso distribution reservoir, the accuracies of the computation are shown in order of H-W, D-W and C-M method.

참고자료

· 없음