오피스텔 주거성 강화가 도시관리에 미치는 영향과 제도 개선방안: 인천시 오피스텔 사례로 (The Effect of Strengthening the Housing Function of Officetels and Improvement of Urban Management System : The Case Study of the Officetels in Incheon)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대한국토·도시계획학회
· 수록지 정보 : 국토계획 / 55권 / 7호 / 109 ~ 125페이지
· 저자명 : 안내영, 박수진

초록

상당히 많은 수의 오피스텔이 주거역할을 하고 있지만, 주택통계에는 포함되지 않고 있어 주택 수급에 착시가 생긴다. 또한, 업무시설로 분류되는 오피스텔은 일조권 등의 기준을 적용할 수 없어 자칫 열악한 주거환경을 양산할 수 있다.
오피스텔의 주거성이 강화되고 있지만, 여전히 제도적 측면에서는 업무시설로 분류하면서 관리가 어려운 부분이 발생하고 있다.
본 연구에서는 인천시 오피스텔 건축 자료로 오피스텔 공급과주거사용 비율 등 현황을 실증적으로 분석하였다. 그리고 오피스텔의 주거성이 강화됨에 따라 발생할 수 있는 도시관리의 문제점을 분석하고 이를 발생시키는 제도와의 관련성을 파악하였다. 이를 통하여 향후 오피스텔 관리의 방향과 제도적 개선 방향을 제시하고자 하였다.

영어초록

‘Officetel’ has the dual characteristic of being both a housing and an office facility: it is managed as an office building under the Building Act and as a quasi-housing facility under the Housing Act. Although it cannot be said that all officetels are used for residential purposes, approximately 56.42% of the officetels in Incheon are estimated to be used as housing; in some areas, more than 65% are expected to be used thus, demonstrating that officetels should be recognized as a form of housing in Korea. However, the Building Act, which regulates building use, still defines an officetel as a business facility, which is causing discrepancies in current usage and urban management. As the number of officetels in commercial areas have increased, the population densities in some commercial areas have exceeded those of residential areas, thereby lowering the quality of living conditions. The urban areas surrounding officetels have deteriorated as officetels freely depend on the nearby urban amenities since they are not required to provide welfare facilities or infrastructures that are usually imposed on housing developments. In the case of Incheon, officetels accounts for about 23.4% of the total housing supply between 2011 and 2016. Assuming that approximately 50% of the officetels are used for residential purposes, this means that officetels as a type of housing account for up to 12% of the total housing supply, which is a considerable amount. With the changes in societal demands, quasi-housing that embodies both housing and other functions is desired. This housing type has now grown in quantity to exert a significant influence in the housing sector; hence, it requires separate management. Officetels need to be recognized as unique building usage, and data needs to be gathered for better management of these facilities in terms of their architecture and the urban and housing contexts. Further, legislative changes are needed to strengthen the housing function of officetels.

참고자료

· 없음