광개토대왕비문 연구의 몇 가지 문제에 대하여 - 부여의 통치구조와 광개토대왕의 대외 정벌에 관하여 - (About a few questions on the research of a tombstone of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 고조선단군학회
· 수록지 정보 : 고조선단군학 / 20권 / 191 ~ 209페이지
· 저자명 : 복기대

초록

The tombstone of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To is very important for interpretation of Eastern Asia at around A.D.400. It is true that a great deal of researches on this has been done since the tombstone was introduced for the first time up to present. The direction of the result of the research has been decided according to the profits of the nationalities of the researchers. Especially, Japan and Korea showed tremendous interests on this because they thought according to the interpretations described on the relationships between the two countries on the tombstone will determine the dominion of hegemony at around A.D.400 in Eastern Asia.
However, in this writing, I have put aside this point of an argument and emphasized purely on fresh historical investigation about the facts which were appeared on the tombstone. As a result, the two words, 'Chun-Je' and 'Hwang-Chun' which appear at the beginning of an inscription do not mean God but Royal Palace of Buyeo at that time instead. I think this interpretation will give us a chance to have a new idea about Buyeo different from what we used to think of.
This article is concerned about foreign conquest of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To, one of our prides of Han-Min-Jok. On Middle School Korean History textbooks and on General Introduction of Korean History, the conquered area by the Great King Kwang-Gae-To was written as 64 fortresses and 1400 villages. This was written based on the result of researches had been done in the past. But what I have found out was much more than this :- 128 fortresses, 3 counties and 2800 villages. The formers are obvious errors. Therefore, our academic society must correct these errors as soon as possible.
The writer has presented a few fresh ideas. I think these should be proven by the verification of my school fellows.

영어초록

The tombstone of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To is very important for interpretation of Eastern Asia at around A.D.400. It is true that a great deal of researches on this has been done since the tombstone was introduced for the first time up to present. The direction of the result of the research has been decided according to the profits of the nationalities of the researchers. Especially, Japan and Korea showed tremendous interests on this because they thought according to the interpretations described on the relationships between the two countries on the tombstone will determine the dominion of hegemony at around A.D.400 in Eastern Asia.
However, in this writing, I have put aside this point of an argument and emphasized purely on fresh historical investigation about the facts which were appeared on the tombstone. As a result, the two words, 'Chun-Je' and 'Hwang-Chun' which appear at the beginning of an inscription do not mean God but Royal Palace of Buyeo at that time instead. I think this interpretation will give us a chance to have a new idea about Buyeo different from what we used to think of.
This article is concerned about foreign conquest of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To, one of our prides of Han-Min-Jok. On Middle School Korean History textbooks and on General Introduction of Korean History, the conquered area by the Great King Kwang-Gae-To was written as 64 fortresses and 1400 villages. This was written based on the result of researches had been done in the past. But what I have found out was much more than this :- 128 fortresses, 3 counties and 2800 villages. The formers are obvious errors. Therefore, our academic society must correct these errors as soon as possible.
The writer has presented a few fresh ideas. I think these should be proven by the verification of my school fellows.

참고자료

· 없음