역사정책: 현재에서 재현되는 ‘과거’의 ‘작용 메커니즘’ - 에드가 볼프룸의 역사정책개념의 동북아적 사례적용과 비판적 수용 (Historical politic and It’s Functions Mechanism)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 동북아시아문화학회
· 수록지 정보 : 동북아 문화연구 / 1권 / 56호 / 233 ~ 248페이지
· 저자명 : 박상욱

초록

In this paper, I apply the historical policy theory Wolfram’s to the case of Northeast Asia. In his historical policy, Wolfrum has studied and analyzed the process of how historical facts of the past are instrumentalized in present real politics. According to Wolfrum, history is the means by which the leaders or community combat internal and external enemies and at the same time the means for the integration of ethnic, religion, societies or other groups. Thus, history in historical policy is a means to slander opponents against leaders and leaders group and to justify their actions. Here, the actore plays a role in shaping the history policy to reflect the ideals and interests of the initiator as much as possible. According to Wolfram's analysis, it is undeniable that history is used for real politics. However, the historical policy of Wolfram has various problems. His historical policy lacks discussions on communication and compromise with its members. In addition, there are in his historical policy no ethnic or moral aspects. It is also worth noting that in the historical policy of Wolfrum, there is no engagement and reconciliation. It is a negative aspect that there is a risk of distortion or manipulation of history in this historical policy phenomenon, But it is a positive aspect that according to the viewpoint of diversified interest groups within a community, a variety of different pasts can be observed and understood. This ‘new generation of the past’ should be continuously analyzed and critically analyzed in relation to the current mechanism of action from a history science.

영어초록

In this paper, I apply the historical policy theory Wolfram’s to the case of Northeast Asia. In his historical policy, Wolfrum has studied and analyzed the process of how historical facts of the past are instrumentalized in present real politics. According to Wolfrum, history is the means by which the leaders or community combat internal and external enemies and at the same time the means for the integration of ethnic, religion, societies or other groups. Thus, history in historical policy is a means to slander opponents against leaders and leaders group and to justify their actions. Here, the actore plays a role in shaping the history policy to reflect the ideals and interests of the initiator as much as possible. According to Wolfram's analysis, it is undeniable that history is used for real politics. However, the historical policy of Wolfram has various problems. His historical policy lacks discussions on communication and compromise with its members. In addition, there are in his historical policy no ethnic or moral aspects. It is also worth noting that in the historical policy of Wolfrum, there is no engagement and reconciliation. It is a negative aspect that there is a risk of distortion or manipulation of history in this historical policy phenomenon, But it is a positive aspect that according to the viewpoint of diversified interest groups within a community, a variety of different pasts can be observed and understood. This ‘new generation of the past’ should be continuously analyzed and critically analyzed in relation to the current mechanism of action from a history science.

참고자료

· 없음