• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

과거력 의무기록 정보의 기재정도 및 일치도 분석 (A Study on the Level of Medical Record Documentation and Agreement in the Information on the Patients Past History)

23 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.19 최종저작일 2008.03
23P 미리보기
과거력 의무기록 정보의 기재정도 및 일치도 분석
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국병원경영학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 병원경영학회지 / 13권 / 1호 / 42 ~ 64페이지
    · 저자명 : 서정숙, 유승흠, 오현주, 김용욱

    초록

    This study was conducted to evaluate the quality in medical records by analyzing its completeness through setting up the level of record on the patient’s past history and through examining the actual medial records. Targeting the information on the patient's past history in interns’ records, residents’ records and nurses' records toward 403 inpatients who were admitted first in 2004 at an university hospital due to stomach cancer. We analyzed whether the charts were recorded or not, recording level, the satisfaction with the expectant level of the records in the hospital targeted for a research and the level of agreement. The results were as follows; first, as for the rate of recording those each items, they were high in the chief complaint & present illness and the past illness history. Depending on the group of recorders, the recording rate showed big difference by items. Second, as a result of measuring the level after dividing the recording level of items for the patient’s past history from Level 1 to Level 4 by each item, the admission history, the past illness history, and the family history were about Level 3, and the smoking history, the medication history, the chief complaint & present illness, the drinking history and allergy were about Level 2. In the admission department, it was excellent in the interns' records for the medical department. Third, as a result of its satisfactory level by comparing the expectant level of a record and the actual record by item in information on the patient’s past history, which was expected by the medical-record committee members of the hospital targeted for a study. And forth, we analyzed the level of agreement with Kappa score in the level of ‘Yes’ or ‘None’ related to the corresponding matter in Level 1, in terms of information on the past history in the intern's record, the resident’s record, and the nurse’s record. The level of agreement in the resident's record & the nurse's record, and in the intern’s record & the resident’s record was from “excellent” to “a little good”. There were differences in the level of completeness and in reliability for the information on the past history by the recorder group or by the admission department. The encounter process that was performed by the admission department or the recorder group, indicated the result that was directly reflected on the quality of medical records, thus it was required further study about the medical record documentation process and quality of care. The items that showed the high recording rate quantitatively were rather low, consequently we'd should develop the tool for the qualitative inspection and evaluate the medical records further. And the items were needed to be detailed in the record level were rather low, and hence there needed to be a documentation guideline and education by the clinical departments

    영어초록

    This study was conducted to evaluate the quality in medical records by analyzing its completeness through setting up the level of record on the patient’s past history and through examining the actual medial records. Targeting the information on the patient's past history in interns’ records, residents’ records and nurses' records toward 403 inpatients who were admitted first in 2004 at an university hospital due to stomach cancer. We analyzed whether the charts were recorded or not, recording level, the satisfaction with the expectant level of the records in the hospital targeted for a research and the level of agreement. The results were as follows; first, as for the rate of recording those each items, they were high in the chief complaint & present illness and the past illness history. Depending on the group of recorders, the recording rate showed big difference by items. Second, as a result of measuring the level after dividing the recording level of items for the patient’s past history from Level 1 to Level 4 by each item, the admission history, the past illness history, and the family history were about Level 3, and the smoking history, the medication history, the chief complaint & present illness, the drinking history and allergy were about Level 2. In the admission department, it was excellent in the interns' records for the medical department. Third, as a result of its satisfactory level by comparing the expectant level of a record and the actual record by item in information on the patient’s past history, which was expected by the medical-record committee members of the hospital targeted for a study. And forth, we analyzed the level of agreement with Kappa score in the level of ‘Yes’ or ‘None’ related to the corresponding matter in Level 1, in terms of information on the past history in the intern's record, the resident’s record, and the nurse’s record. The level of agreement in the resident's record & the nurse's record, and in the intern’s record & the resident’s record was from “excellent” to “a little good”. There were differences in the level of completeness and in reliability for the information on the past history by the recorder group or by the admission department. The encounter process that was performed by the admission department or the recorder group, indicated the result that was directly reflected on the quality of medical records, thus it was required further study about the medical record documentation process and quality of care. The items that showed the high recording rate quantitatively were rather low, consequently we'd should develop the tool for the qualitative inspection and evaluate the medical records further. And the items were needed to be detailed in the record level were rather low, and hence there needed to be a documentation guideline and education by the clinical departments

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • EasyAI 무료체험
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 10월 15일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
4:18 오전