한국어판 부부 만족도 측정도구 및 단축형의 타당도와 신뢰도 (Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Couple Satisfaction Index)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국간호과학회
· 수록지 정보 : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing / 52권 / 2호 / 228 ~ 243페이지
· 저자명 : 김석선, 길민지, 김다은, 김선해, 허다연, 문난영

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI 32, 16, 4) into Korean, evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of CSI (K-CSI 32, 16, 4), and determine a cut-off score with Korean couples. Methods: K-CSI 32 was translated and back-translated by 5 bilingual experts and group discussions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) was conducted with data from a sample of 218 couples (N=436) to test constructs validity. Validity and reliability were evaluated. Also, receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was used to obtain the cut-off score. Results: The construct validity of K-CSI 32, 16, 4 were verified using one-factor structures. The result of CFA showed a slightly better fit for the K-CSI 16, 4 than for the K-CSI 32 model. Convergent validity was supported by significant positive correlations of K-CSI with Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Family Relationship Assessment Scale. Also, a significant differences in K-CSI between normal and depressive group demonstrated known-group validity. A cut-off score of 105.5 on the K-CSI 32, 50.25 on the K-CSI 16, and 13.25 on the K-CSI 4 has been validated to identify distressed couple relationships.
Conclusion: For clinical practice, this reliable and valid K-CSI 32 has the potential to measure changes in the couple satisfaction after couple therapy or interventions. Applying K-CSI 32 may facilitate research about couple and family relationship in nursing, and contribute to knowledge about the role of the couple satisfaction in the health.

영어초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI 32, 16, 4) into Korean, evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of CSI (K-CSI 32, 16, 4), and determine a cut-off score with Korean couples. Methods: K-CSI 32 was translated and back-translated by 5 bilingual experts and group discussions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) was conducted with data from a sample of 218 couples (N=436) to test constructs validity. Validity and reliability were evaluated. Also, receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was used to obtain the cut-off score. Results: The construct validity of K-CSI 32, 16, 4 were verified using one-factor structures. The result of CFA showed a slightly better fit for the K-CSI 16, 4 than for the K-CSI 32 model. Convergent validity was supported by significant positive correlations of K-CSI with Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Family Relationship Assessment Scale. Also, a significant differences in K-CSI between normal and depressive group demonstrated known-group validity. A cut-off score of 105.5 on the K-CSI 32, 50.25 on the K-CSI 16, and 13.25 on the K-CSI 4 has been validated to identify distressed couple relationships.
Conclusion: For clinical practice, this reliable and valid K-CSI 32 has the potential to measure changes in the couple satisfaction after couple therapy or interventions. Applying K-CSI 32 may facilitate research about couple and family relationship in nursing, and contribute to knowledge about the role of the couple satisfaction in the health.

참고자료

· 없음