관형사형 어미 습득에 있어서 이해 가능한 출력의 역할에 대한 검증: ‘-(으)ㄴ’과 ‘-던’의 습득 양상을 중심으로 (The role of comprehensible output in adnominal ending acquisition -acquisition patterns of '-(으)ㄴ' and '-던-')

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국사회언어학회
· 수록지 정보 : 사회언어학 / 33권 / 1호 / 171 ~ 205페이지
· 저자명 : 조춘실

초록

This study examines the acquisition patterns of Chinese advanced Korean learners before and after comprehensive output is applied in the acquisition of adnominal suffix, The aim of this study is like to verify whether it functions as a “'perceptive”'among the important roles in second-language acquisition. The main research question sad dressed are as follows: 1. What is the acquisition pattern of '-(으)ㄴ' and '-던' be fore and after applying the compressible output? 2. What is the cognitive processing patterns of '-(으)ㄴ' and '-던' of learners before and after the compressible output is applied? 3. (Hypothesis verification)The compressible output functions to recognize the target grammar item.
Pre- and post-SPRT and WGJT are conducted to solve Research Problems 1 and 2, and to solve Research Problem 3, interview contents with participants and reconstructed contents are analyzed.
The results in dicate that for the first research question, the response rate of learners to the tubular ending '-(으)ㄴ' question increased the post-correct answer rate, and resulted in more effective acquisition compared with before the output is applied. Meanwhile, the learner's response rate to “'-던”'improved slightly. However, ]no significant difference is indicated between the before and after cases;,therefore, one may not conclude that the acquisition of '-던' after the output is more effective.
Regarding the cognitive processing patterns '-(으)ㄴ' and '-던', the main effect of the '-(으)ㄴ' sub-item type(F=3.14, P= .045) and the main effect before and after the output is applied(F=28.54, P= .000) are significant. However, the item type and the interaction before and after the output is applied(F=0.39, P= .75) cannot be confirmed as significant. In other words, both the pre- and post-learners ex hi bit different sensitivities depending on the type of question. However, one may not firmly conclude that the pattern of varying sensitivities differs before and after the output is applied.
Regarding the question pertaining to '-던' one may not conclude that the main effect of the item type(F=1.11, P= .37), the main effect before and after the output is applied(F=1.65, P=.37), and the interaction between the item type and the pre-and post-output(F=1.71, P= .14) are all significant. In other words, one may not conclude the sensitivity of '-던' varies bypre-/ post-output and the item type.
Interviews and reconstructions with participants are analyzed to verify the "getting to know" hypothesis among the important roles posed in the third research question. The result shows that,, in acquiring a second language, the understandable output clearly recognizes the gap between what one wishes to express and what one can use accurately through communication, corrects errors from the other person’'s feedback, or activates the knowledge one learned to promote the level of accurate use from avoidance for the part one wishes to express when correcting errors.

영어초록

This study examines the acquisition patterns of Chinese advanced Korean learners before and after comprehensive output is applied in the acquisition of adnominal suffix, The aim of this study is like to verify whether it functions as a “'perceptive”'among the important roles in second-language acquisition. The main research question sad dressed are as follows: 1. What is the acquisition pattern of '-(으)ㄴ' and '-던' be fore and after applying the compressible output? 2. What is the cognitive processing patterns of '-(으)ㄴ' and '-던' of learners before and after the compressible output is applied? 3. (Hypothesis verification)The compressible output functions to recognize the target grammar item.
Pre- and post-SPRT and WGJT are conducted to solve Research Problems 1 and 2, and to solve Research Problem 3, interview contents with participants and reconstructed contents are analyzed.
The results in dicate that for the first research question, the response rate of learners to the tubular ending '-(으)ㄴ' question increased the post-correct answer rate, and resulted in more effective acquisition compared with before the output is applied. Meanwhile, the learner's response rate to “'-던”'improved slightly. However, ]no significant difference is indicated between the before and after cases;,therefore, one may not conclude that the acquisition of '-던' after the output is more effective.
Regarding the cognitive processing patterns '-(으)ㄴ' and '-던', the main effect of the '-(으)ㄴ' sub-item type(F=3.14, P= .045) and the main effect before and after the output is applied(F=28.54, P= .000) are significant. However, the item type and the interaction before and after the output is applied(F=0.39, P= .75) cannot be confirmed as significant. In other words, both the pre- and post-learners ex hi bit different sensitivities depending on the type of question. However, one may not firmly conclude that the pattern of varying sensitivities differs before and after the output is applied.
Regarding the question pertaining to '-던' one may not conclude that the main effect of the item type(F=1.11, P= .37), the main effect before and after the output is applied(F=1.65, P=.37), and the interaction between the item type and the pre-and post-output(F=1.71, P= .14) are all significant. In other words, one may not conclude the sensitivity of '-던' varies bypre-/ post-output and the item type.
Interviews and reconstructions with participants are analyzed to verify the "getting to know" hypothesis among the important roles posed in the third research question. The result shows that,, in acquiring a second language, the understandable output clearly recognizes the gap between what one wishes to express and what one can use accurately through communication, corrects errors from the other person’'s feedback, or activates the knowledge one learned to promote the level of accurate use from avoidance for the part one wishes to express when correcting errors.

참고자료

· 없음