대전통과 소전통의 이중 변주 - 중국의 대전통·소전통에 관한 학술담론의 지형도(1980-1990년대) (Dual Variation of Great Tradition and Little Tradition : A Topography of Chinese Academic Discourse on ‘Great Tradition and Little Tradition’(1980's-1990's))

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중국어문학연구회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국어문학논집 / 96호 / 323 ~ 350페이지
· 저자명 : 이유진

초록

This paper examines a topography of Chinese academic discourse on ‘great tradition and little tradition’(1980's-1990's), which is a part of the research of “Crucial Aspects of Chinese Academic Discourse on ‘Great Tradition and Little Tradition’ and Its Meaning”. The goals of this research are to clarify national identity-building in today's China.
Robert Redfield presented the concept of ‘little tradition and great tradition’. The twin concept stands for ‘high and low culture’ or ‘classic and folk culture’ or ‘learned and popular culture’. The core of this paper is to describe and analyze different concepts of ‘little tradition and great tradition’ in China. For this purpose, this paper investigates the opinions of some scholars on the concept of ‘little tradition and great tradition’.
Yu Yingshi, Li Yiyuan, Chen Lai, Ge Zhaoguang, and Fei Xiaotong, these scholars focus on either ‘great tradition’ or ‘little tradition’. In my view, it is all a question of ‘tradition’ handed down within in their community. Tradition is a flexible concept. And of course, the same is true for ‘little tradition and great tradition’. The social circumstances at the time are the key drivers of the change related to these concepts. This is why I contextualize Chinese academic discourse on ‘great tradition and little tradition’(1980's-1990's) within a sociocultural framework. The two traditions are interdependent. Dual variation of great tradition and little tradition circulates on a Möbius strip named ‘Tradition’.

영어초록

This paper examines a topography of Chinese academic discourse on ‘great tradition and little tradition’(1980's-1990's), which is a part of the research of “Crucial Aspects of Chinese Academic Discourse on ‘Great Tradition and Little Tradition’ and Its Meaning”. The goals of this research are to clarify national identity-building in today's China.
Robert Redfield presented the concept of ‘little tradition and great tradition’. The twin concept stands for ‘high and low culture’ or ‘classic and folk culture’ or ‘learned and popular culture’. The core of this paper is to describe and analyze different concepts of ‘little tradition and great tradition’ in China. For this purpose, this paper investigates the opinions of some scholars on the concept of ‘little tradition and great tradition’.
Yu Yingshi, Li Yiyuan, Chen Lai, Ge Zhaoguang, and Fei Xiaotong, these scholars focus on either ‘great tradition’ or ‘little tradition’. In my view, it is all a question of ‘tradition’ handed down within in their community. Tradition is a flexible concept. And of course, the same is true for ‘little tradition and great tradition’. The social circumstances at the time are the key drivers of the change related to these concepts. This is why I contextualize Chinese academic discourse on ‘great tradition and little tradition’(1980's-1990's) within a sociocultural framework. The two traditions are interdependent. Dual variation of great tradition and little tradition circulates on a Möbius strip named ‘Tradition’.

참고자료

· 없음