대(對)테러리즘 분야 연구경향 분석- 국가정보원 테러정보통합센터 대테러정책 연구논총을 중심으로 - (A Study on the Research Trend of Counter-terrorism - Focused on the Journal of Studies in Counterterrorism Policies by National Intelligence Service's Terrorism Information Integration Center -)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : (사)위기관리이론과실천
· 수록지 정보 : Crisisonomy / 10권 / 4호 / 53 ~ 69페이지
· 저자명 : 이대성, 류상일

초록

이 연구는 2004년부터 2011년까지『대테러정책 연구논총』에 게재된 학술논문을 언어네트워크방법론을 이용하여 연구경향을 분석하였는데, 그 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 우선, 2004년부터 2011년까지『대테러정책 연구논총』연구흐름의 공통점을 살펴보면, 연도별로 “테러”, “대테러”, “대책”, “대비” 등의 주제어 중심성 값이 높게 나타났다. 다음, 연도별 차이점을 살펴보면, 첫째, 2004년은 “미국”, “반테러법”, “실천”, “입법적” 등의 빈도가 높았고 둘째, 2005년은 “변화”, “규제”, “테러리즘”, “국제협약”, “이행법률”, “제정” 등의 빈도가 높았다. 셋째, 2006년은 “대테러정책”, “대테러정책변화”, “선진국” 등의 빈도가 높았고, 2007년은 “테러리즘”, “알카에다”, “조직”, “긴급의료체계”, “동남아시아”, “방사능테러”, “상호연계성”, “이슬람”, “이슬람 원리주의” 등의 빈도가 높았다. 넷째, 2008년은 “관”, “동향”, “테러리즘”, “방사능”, “협력”, “방사능테러”, “방사능물질”, “보안관리”, “위험”, “시설” 등의 빈도가 높았고, 2009년은 “동향”, “테러리즘”, “각국”, “관련법”, “기능”, “대테러조직”, “위상”, “제정동향”, “추세”, “효율적” 등의 빈도가 높았다. 다섯째, 2010년은 “개선방향”, “법”, “테러위협”, “거버넌스”, “공조”, “국제사이버테러”, “국제테러리즘”, “국제형사사법”, “대테러정책”, “효과성” 등의 빈도가 높았고, 2011년은 “테러리즘”, “자생테러”, “사회학적” 등의 빈도가 높았다.

영어초록

This study has analyzed trends of academic papers published in the Journal of Studies in Counterterrorism Policies from 2004 to 2011 in the methodology of language network. The results of the analysis are as follows. First of all, the trends of work in the Journal of Studies in Counterterrorism Policies have revealed that the centrality values of key words like “terrorism,” “counterterrorism,” “measures,” and “preparedness” were taken to be high. Next, year-based differences have shown first that the frequencies of “America,” “anti-terrorism act,” “practice,” and “legislative” were high in 2004, and second so were the frequencies of “changes,” “regulations,” “terrorism,” “international treaties,” “executed laws,” and “establishment” in 2005. Third, the frequencies of “counterterrorism policies,” “changes in counterterrorism policies,” and “developed countries” were high in 2006, and so were the frequencies of “terrorism,” “Al-Qaeda,” “organization,” “emergency medical systems,” “radiation terrorism,” “interconnectedness,” “Islam,” and “Islamic radicalism” in 2007. Fourth, the frequencies of “authorities,” “conditions,” “terrorism,” “radiation,” “cooperation,” “radiation terrorism,” “radioactive materials,” “security control,” “danger,” and “facilities” were high in 2008, and so were the frequencies of “conditions,” “terrorism,” “individual countries,” “related laws,” “functions,” “counterterrorism organizations,” “status,” “financial conditions” etc. in 2009. Fifth, the frequencies of “direction of improvement,” “law,” “threatening terrorism,” “governance,” “mutual assistance,” “international cyber terrorism,” “international criminal justice,” “counterterrorism policies,” and “effectiveness” were high in 2010, and so were those of “terrorism,” “autonomous terrorism,” “autonomous terrorism,” and “sociological” in 2011.

참고자료

· 없음