高麗時代 ‘大藏經 및 敎藏’ 認識과 그 의의 (Recognition and Significance of ‘Tripitaka(大藏) and Kyojang(敎藏)’ in Goryeo Dynasty)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국중세사학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국중세사연구 / 42호 / 275 ~ 310페이지
· 저자명 : 박용진

초록

This study investigated that the Goryeo Tripitaka is dual deployed in the ‘Tripitaka and Kyojang’ in comparison with the Chinese Tripitaka of East Asia Buddhist community. Trying to clear this, The study analyzed the system and content of the Goryeo Tripitaka(大藏經) and Kyojang(敎藏). The study analyzed the recording scriptures of Goryeo Tripitaka, Song(宋) Tripitaka and Jin(金) Tripitaka each other. Goryeo published in sokjang(續藏：Goryeo Addenda) while accept the Tripitaka from Song. Among these processes, Goryeo recognized by classifying ‘Tripitaka and Kyojang’. The results are as in the following.
In order to know the Tripitaka recognition of Goryeo, the study analyzed the Scripture in the <Daejang-mokrok(大藏目錄)> of Goryeo Tripitaka-Chojojang(初雕藏) and Jaejojang(再雕藏). As a result, there were similar configuration and order, some of the scriptures was different. In the Goryeo Tripitaka whether scripture include or not, it was under the control of the country. Tripitaka recognition of Goryeo is a feature has not been included(非入藏) for the the Commentaries(章疏) of various Buddhist Schools(諸宗).
Tripitaka recognition of Goryeo had recognized to be divided into groups constituted by <Tripitaka with a focus on Sūtras, Vinaya, Abhidharma śāstras, the three divisions of the Buddhist canon and Kyojang with a focus on Commentary, Courtesy and Biography etc>. In Goryeo, it was deployed Goryeo-daejanggyung(高麗大藏經：the Korean Tripiṭaka) and Goryeo gyojang(高麗敎藏).
Goryeo-daejanggyung unlike the Chinese and Japanese Tripitaka, did not include the commentary(章疏). And Goryeo was divided into ‘Tripitaka and Kyojang’ by placing the Kyojang(敎藏) over Munjong(文宗) and Seonjong(宣宗) period. In East Asia Buddhist community, this is the uniqueness and particularity with the Goryeo-daejanggyung.

영어초록

This study investigated that the Goryeo Tripitaka is dual deployed in the ‘Tripitaka and Kyojang’ in comparison with the Chinese Tripitaka of East Asia Buddhist community. Trying to clear this, The study analyzed the system and content of the Goryeo Tripitaka(大藏經) and Kyojang(敎藏). The study analyzed the recording scriptures of Goryeo Tripitaka, Song(宋) Tripitaka and Jin(金) Tripitaka each other. Goryeo published in sokjang(續藏：Goryeo Addenda) while accept the Tripitaka from Song. Among these processes, Goryeo recognized by classifying ‘Tripitaka and Kyojang’. The results are as in the following.
In order to know the Tripitaka recognition of Goryeo, the study analyzed the Scripture in the <Daejang-mokrok(大藏目錄)> of Goryeo Tripitaka-Chojojang(初雕藏) and Jaejojang(再雕藏). As a result, there were similar configuration and order, some of the scriptures was different. In the Goryeo Tripitaka whether scripture include or not, it was under the control of the country. Tripitaka recognition of Goryeo is a feature has not been included(非入藏) for the the Commentaries(章疏) of various Buddhist Schools(諸宗).
Tripitaka recognition of Goryeo had recognized to be divided into groups constituted by <Tripitaka with a focus on Sūtras, Vinaya, Abhidharma śāstras, the three divisions of the Buddhist canon and Kyojang with a focus on Commentary, Courtesy and Biography etc>. In Goryeo, it was deployed Goryeo-daejanggyung(高麗大藏經：the Korean Tripiṭaka) and Goryeo gyojang(高麗敎藏).
Goryeo-daejanggyung unlike the Chinese and Japanese Tripitaka, did not include the commentary(章疏). And Goryeo was divided into ‘Tripitaka and Kyojang’ by placing the Kyojang(敎藏) over Munjong(文宗) and Seonjong(宣宗) period. In East Asia Buddhist community, this is the uniqueness and particularity with the Goryeo-daejanggyung.

참고자료

· 없음