『姓源錄』을 통해서 본 서울 중인 가계 연구 - 중인 가계의 유형과 규모 및 정체성 - (A Study on the Chungin Lineages With Seongwonlok(姓源錄))

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 서울시립대학교 서울학연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 서울학연구 / 39호 / 41 ~ 77페이지
· 저자명 : 김두헌

초록

Most of all lineage records of important Chungin(中人) lineages had written in Seongwonlok(姓源錄). As this fact, it was evidenced that Seongwonlok is total genealogy of Chungin. Through the many important Chungin lineage records written in Seongwonlok we can measurement a scope of Chungin’s lineages. By the Seongwonlok we can recognize that Chungin monopolized technical official post.
Among the Seongwonlok’s lineage records, family records under Pasijo(派始祖) didn’t fabricated. It were discoverid merely a small minority’s mistake of Seongwonlok’ s compiler. we can correct these mistakes with other historical materials. It were judgmented that the authority in Seongwonlok was the degree enough to used as the historical documents.
The family line of Lee Chang-Hyun(李昌鉉), Seongwonlok’s editor didn’t different from any other Chungin ineages. The purpose that Lee Chang Hyun compiled Seongwonlok was to a record the facts that Chungin highly unioned.
The one among the Seongwonlok’s important value as the historical document was in Seongwonlok hand the aspects that almost Chungin ineages existenced with the strength combination in the nineteenth century. Chungin had plenty of margin rising the social status than Yangin(良人). But nerely great part of Chungin subsistenced with the strong identity in the nineteenth century. We must anew research the phase that status system had changed after ImgJinOaelan(壬辰倭亂).

영어초록

Most of all lineage records of important Chungin(中人) lineages had written in Seongwonlok(姓源錄). As this fact, it was evidenced that Seongwonlok is total genealogy of Chungin. Through the many important Chungin lineage records written in Seongwonlok we can measurement a scope of Chungin’s lineages. By the Seongwonlok we can recognize that Chungin monopolized technical official post.
Among the Seongwonlok’s lineage records, family records under Pasijo(派始祖) didn’t fabricated. It were discoverid merely a small minority’s mistake of Seongwonlok’ s compiler. we can correct these mistakes with other historical materials. It were judgmented that the authority in Seongwonlok was the degree enough to used as the historical documents.
The family line of Lee Chang-Hyun(李昌鉉), Seongwonlok’s editor didn’t different from any other Chungin ineages. The purpose that Lee Chang Hyun compiled Seongwonlok was to a record the facts that Chungin highly unioned.
The one among the Seongwonlok’s important value as the historical document was in Seongwonlok hand the aspects that almost Chungin ineages existenced with the strength combination in the nineteenth century. Chungin had plenty of margin rising the social status than Yangin(良人). But nerely great part of Chungin subsistenced with the strong identity in the nineteenth century. We must anew research the phase that status system had changed after ImgJinOaelan(壬辰倭亂).

참고자료

· 없음