‘-었-’과 결합하는 보조용언의 문법화와 의미적 특성- ‘고 앉다’, ‘-고 자빠지다’, ‘-어 빠지다’, ‘-어 터지다’를 중심으로- (On the Grammaticalization and Semantic Characteristics of Auxiliary Verbs combined with ‘-eoss(었)’)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국어의미학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국어 의미학 / 78권 / 312 ~ 330페이지
· 저자명 : 이금희

초록

The purpose of this paper seeks to examine the grammaticalization process and semantic characteristics of the auxiliary verbs ‘-ko anjassda(-고 앉았다)’, ‘-ko jappajyeossda(-고 자빠졌다)’, ‘-eo ppajyeossda(-어 빠졌다)’ and ‘-eo teojyeossda(-어 터졌다)’.
These auxiliary verbs have the same in that ‘-eoss-(-었-)’ is combined, but the connective ending combined with the main verbs appear differently as ‘-ko(고)’ or ‘-eo(어)’. ‘anjassda(앉았다)’ and ‘jappajyeossda(자빠졌다)’ combined with ‘-ko’ indicate that the preceding proposition is in progress, and ‘ppajyeossda(빠졌다)’ and ‘teojyeossda(터졌다)’ combined with ‘-eo(어)’ indicate the continuation of the resultant state. All of these auxiliary verbs indicate the speaker's dissatisfaction and disapproval. ‘-ko anjassda(-고 앉았다)’ and ‘-ko jappajyeossda(-고 자빠졌다)’ are auxiliary verbs that reveal the speaker's dissatisfaction with an action, but ‘-eo ppajyeossda(-어 빠졌다)’ and ‘-eo teojyeossda(-어 터졌다)’ reveal the speaker's dissatisfaction with a state. In previous studies, it was discussed that ‘-eo ppajyeossda(-어 빠졌다)’ and ‘-eo teojyeossda(-어 터졌다)’ were combined only with state verbs, and it was considered that auxiliary verbs selected according to the semantic characteristics of main verbs were different. However, these auxiliary verbs are also combined with state verbs and change verbs, and the binding constraints seem to gradually disappear and change into auxiliary verbs representing similar semantic functions.

영어초록

The purpose of this paper seeks to examine the grammaticalization process and semantic characteristics of the auxiliary verbs ‘-ko anjassda(-고 앉았다)’, ‘-ko jappajyeossda(-고 자빠졌다)’, ‘-eo ppajyeossda(-어 빠졌다)’ and ‘-eo teojyeossda(-어 터졌다)’.
These auxiliary verbs have the same in that ‘-eoss-(-었-)’ is combined, but the connective ending combined with the main verbs appear differently as ‘-ko(고)’ or ‘-eo(어)’. ‘anjassda(앉았다)’ and ‘jappajyeossda(자빠졌다)’ combined with ‘-ko’ indicate that the preceding proposition is in progress, and ‘ppajyeossda(빠졌다)’ and ‘teojyeossda(터졌다)’ combined with ‘-eo(어)’ indicate the continuation of the resultant state. All of these auxiliary verbs indicate the speaker's dissatisfaction and disapproval. ‘-ko anjassda(-고 앉았다)’ and ‘-ko jappajyeossda(-고 자빠졌다)’ are auxiliary verbs that reveal the speaker's dissatisfaction with an action, but ‘-eo ppajyeossda(-어 빠졌다)’ and ‘-eo teojyeossda(-어 터졌다)’ reveal the speaker's dissatisfaction with a state. In previous studies, it was discussed that ‘-eo ppajyeossda(-어 빠졌다)’ and ‘-eo teojyeossda(-어 터졌다)’ were combined only with state verbs, and it was considered that auxiliary verbs selected according to the semantic characteristics of main verbs were different. However, these auxiliary verbs are also combined with state verbs and change verbs, and the binding constraints seem to gradually disappear and change into auxiliary verbs representing similar semantic functions.

참고자료

· 없음