한국과 일본의 미용제도 비교연구 －자격 및 면허제도, 교육제도를 중심으로－ (Comparative Study of Cosmetic Treatment Systems in Korea and Japan)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 동아시아일본학회
· 수록지 정보 : 일본문화연구 / 47호 / 283 ~ 308페이지
· 저자명 : 심은경

초록

This research aims- by comparing cosmetic treatment systems in Korea and Japan, which are geographically close but much different emotionally, socio- culturally, and politically- to contribute to improving cosmetic treatment policies in Korea. The cosmetic treatment act is not managed and operated independently and is under the public health management act in Korea; whereas, Japan has an independent and unified beauty artist act, thereby emphasizing the rights and responsibilities of beauticians in a more systematic and professional manner. In Korea, in regard to obtaining necessary qualifications, beauticians can attain licenses more easily at private training schools in addition to regular colleges, and the system is set up in a way that allows candidates to take a practical skill test at their discretion after passing a written examination. In contrast, in Japan, permission to take a theoretic examination is given only after a prescribed process - about 2,000 hour training – has been completed at a state-designated cosmetic treatment school and permission to take practical skill tests is given only after gaining a minimum of 1-year of practical experience. Korea’s beautician training system ought to be differentiated between the training process of 2-year and 4-year colleges, and it should have a standardized training process that offers a harmonious theory as pure fundamental science and practical training.
This research finds that Korea should enact a beautician act, which ensures professionalism for cosmetic treatment-like Japan- and should reform it’s qualifications and license systems into a test system that facilitates theory and practical skills to be helpful in cosmetic treatment shops.

영어초록

This research aims- by comparing cosmetic treatment systems in Korea and Japan, which are geographically close but much different emotionally, socio- culturally, and politically- to contribute to improving cosmetic treatment policies in Korea. The cosmetic treatment act is not managed and operated independently and is under the public health management act in Korea; whereas, Japan has an independent and unified beauty artist act, thereby emphasizing the rights and responsibilities of beauticians in a more systematic and professional manner. In Korea, in regard to obtaining necessary qualifications, beauticians can attain licenses more easily at private training schools in addition to regular colleges, and the system is set up in a way that allows candidates to take a practical skill test at their discretion after passing a written examination. In contrast, in Japan, permission to take a theoretic examination is given only after a prescribed process - about 2,000 hour training – has been completed at a state-designated cosmetic treatment school and permission to take practical skill tests is given only after gaining a minimum of 1-year of practical experience. Korea’s beautician training system ought to be differentiated between the training process of 2-year and 4-year colleges, and it should have a standardized training process that offers a harmonious theory as pure fundamental science and practical training.
This research finds that Korea should enact a beautician act, which ensures professionalism for cosmetic treatment-like Japan- and should reform it’s qualifications and license systems into a test system that facilitates theory and practical skills to be helpful in cosmetic treatment shops.

참고자료

· 없음