국내 계획공동체 마을의 주민참여의 실태 및 특성

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국주거학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국주거학회논문집 / 19권 / 5호
· 저자명 : 최정신

목차

I. 서 론
II. 이론적 배경
III. 연구의 범위와 방법
IV. 연구결과 및 논의
VI. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

초록

본 연구의 목적은 현재 국내에서 개발된 계획공동체 마을인 친환경 마을, 동호인 마을과 종교공동체 마을을 중심으로 실제 설립과정에서부터 운영에 이르기까지 어떻게 주민참여가 이루어졌는가를 구체적인 사례를 통하여 알아보는 것이다. 특히 설립과정에서의 주민참여 방법과 과정,입주 후 공동활동의 종류와 자치규약, 그리고 공동생활시설과 그 운영 및 관리 등에 대한 실태조사를 통하여 앞으로의 국내 계획공동체 마을의 설립과 유지의 활성화를 위한 기초 정보를 제공하고자 한다. 이러한 주민참여에 대한 연구는 국내 계획공동체 마을의 설립에 주민참여를 적극적으로 유도할 수 있는 방안을 제시함으로써 이웃과 함께 하는 공동체적인 주거생활을 우리사회에 효과적으로 보급시키는 데 일익을 담당할 수 있으리라 기대된다.

영어초록

In Korea, a movement for forming intentional communities is gathering people's interests to improve individualistic living environment, and to create a humanistic lifestyle. However, it is difficult to say if its management is successful or not, because intentional community is just in the experimental stage in Korea. The purpose of this study is to identify actual condition of residents’ participation in forming process, shared activities in their daily lives, residents’ regulation, common facilities and its management in order to offer basic information for revitalization of intentional communities in Korea. 7 intentional communities including eco-friendly villages, religious communities and a cooperative housing community were collected as the study objects. Upon analysis, those communities were divided into two groups according to their purpose of establishment; “HC (Housing-life focused Community includes cooperative housing community and ecofriendly community)” and “IC (Ideology focused Community includes ideology community and religious community)” in order to identify difference in residents’ participation between the two groups. In-dept interviews with representatives of 7 intentional communities by a structured questionnaire were used as study method. The findings of this study are as follows; In general, more active residents’ participation is identified in ICs than in HCs. There is no common house,which is considered as essential in intentional community, in HCs, while it was facilitated in all ICs. Role of leader seems more important in ICs than in HCs. About the ownership of housing and land, private owned is common in HCs, while community owned is common in ICs. Shared activities and residents’ regulations are evidently less in most HCs than in ICs. Furthermore, in order to run a community sustainable, it is crucial to encourage sense of community among residents, and developing common house and activity programs. Common house design, which can promote proactive residents’ participation in shared activity should be studied fitted to Korean circumstances. Above all, proactive participation in the shared activities is one of the most important factors in intentional community.

참고자료

· 없음