[영작문]강정구 교수에 대한 나의 생각

목차

1. 강정구 교수의 발언 내용을 간단히 정리하고, 그 의견의 적정성을 판단.

2. 강정구 교수의 발언에 대한 동국대 이사장 현해 스님의 발언 내용의 적정성을 판단.

3. "언론의 자유(Freedom of Speech)"의 가치와 중요성 및 그 이유를 정리하고, "한국의 특수성"에 의해 그것이 제한받아야 하는지, 그 적정한 정도는 무엇이어야 하는지에 대한 의견을 제시.

4. "학문의 자유(Academic Freedom)"의 가치와 중요성 및 그 이유를 정리하고, "한국의 특수성"에 의해 그것이 재한 받아야 하는지, 그 적정한 정도는 무엇이어야 하는지에 대한 의견을 제시.

(문서내 구분없음)

본문내용

The identification of south was based on the Korea contemporary government succeeded the spirit of 3.1 movements. Therefore south regime was keeping the identification of nation from the ancient Gochoseon in the past. On the other side, North Korea regime was mot same to south government, But according to a professor Kang, Jung Gu denied the identity of Korea. According to his theory, he insisted that if one of two regimes wins that is just unification by north regime or south regime. The power of north regime was so strong than that of south. So the unification should be done by the North Korea regime. And he continued to insist that he was regretful on the failure of unification by the north Korea regime as well as he regards Kim, Il sung. He is thinking that as if Kim, Il sung was the unique leader for unification of our race independently, But all of their weapons were given by Soviet Union at that time. Kim, Il Sung regime was backed by the Soviet Union communist party. The North Korea regime prepared for the war and attempt to unify the Korean peninsular. I think that he seems to be dazzled by a word of North Korea’s independence. The independence by the North Korea seems to be in real outwardly, but it was a forged external power. At that time they induced the labor power from China and ideology and weapon from Soviet Union.

참고 자료

없음