• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
BRONZE
BRONZE 등급의 판매자 자료
non-ai
판매자가 AI를 사용하지 않은 독창적인 자료

정보시스템 개발 프로젝트의 성공요인에 관한 연구

"정보시스템 개발 프로젝트의 성공요인에 관한 연구"에 대한 내용입니다.
32 페이지
워드
최초등록일 2019.03.14 최종저작일 2019.02
32P 미리보기
정보시스템 개발 프로젝트의 성공요인에 관한 연구
  • 미리보기

    목차

    1. Abstract
    2. INTRODUCTION
    3. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
    4. RESEARCH MODEL AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT
    5. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
    6. RESULTS
    7. DISCUSSION

    본문내용

    INTRODUCTION

    Emerging technology, mostly an outcome of R&D projects and research that focus on critical success factors, is becoming increasingly significant [27, 52]. Corporations and organizations have recently constituted multi-project teams and launched projects to create intricate technologies and products [51]. Moreover, many companies concentrate their core competencies on developing innovative technologies and products through huge investments of various resources such as finance, information technology, human resources, and leadership [66]. Therefore, the interest in project leadership is of growing significance and relevance as projects are being conducted in more complex and unpredictable environments [60].
    According to existing literature concerning project management, the role of project leadership is highly significant to a project’s success [74, 98]. Project leadership is also closely associated with project team quality and project performance.

    참고자료

    · Afsar B, F. Badir Y, Bin Saeed B. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2014:114(8): 1270-1300.
    · Aga DA, Noorderhaven N, Vallejo B. Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building. Int J Proj Manag. 2016:34(5): 806-818.
    · Ahmed R. Impact of project manager's intellectual competencies on project success. In. Impact of project manager's intellectual competencies on project success; 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3044362.
    · Akgün AE, Lynn GS, Keskin H, Dogan D. Team learning in it implementation projects: Antecedents and consequences. Int J Inform Manage. 2014:34(1): 37-47.
    · Alos-Simo L, Verdu-Jover AJ, Gomez-Gras J-M. How transformational leadership facilitates e-business adoption. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2017:117(2): 382-397.
    · Anderson MH, Sun PY. Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full‐range’theory. Int J Manag Rev. 2017:19(1): 76-96.
    · Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Publ Adm Res Theor. 2008:18(4): 543-571.
    · Aronson ZH, Reilly RR, Lynn GS. The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. J Eng Technol Manage. 2006:23(3): 221-247.
    · Aubé C, Rousseau V. Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dyn-Theor Res. 2005:9(3): 189-204.
    · Baccarini D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Proj Manag J. 1999:30(4): 25-32.
    · Baker BN, Murphy DC, Fisher D. Factors affecting project success. In: Cleland DI and King WR editors. Factors affecting project success. Project management handbook; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1988.
    · Bass B. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press
    · Bass BM. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? Am Psychol. 1997:52(2): 130-139.
    · Bass BM, Avolio BJ. Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
    · Basten D, Joosten D, Mellis W. Managers' perceptions of information system project success. J Comput Inform Syst. 2011:52(2): 12-21.
    · Belout A, Gauvreau C. Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management. Int J Proj Manag. 2004:22(1): 1-11.
    · Besner C, Hobbs B. The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Proj Manag J. 2006:37(3): 37-48.
    · Boyne GA. Public and private management: What’s the difference? J MANAGE STUD. 2002:39(1): 97-122.
    · Cheng J-W, Chang S-C, Kuo J-H, Cheung Y-H. Ethical leadership, work engagement, and voice behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2014:114(5): 817-831.
    · Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research.
    · Dóci E, Hofmans J. Task complexity and transformational leadership: The mediating role of leaders' state core self-evaluations. Leadership Quart. 2015:26(3): 436-447.
    · DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform Syst Res. 1992:3(1): 60-95.
    · Denison DR, Hart SL, Kahn JA. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad Manage J. 1996:39(4): 1005-1023.
    · Dingsøyr T, Lindsjørn Y. Team performance in agile development teams: Findings from 18 focus groups. In. Team performance in agile development teams: Findings from 18 focus groups. International Conference on Agile Software Development: Springer; 2013.
    · Dionne SD, Yammarino FJ, Atwater LE, Spangler WD. Transformational leadership and team performance. J Organ Change Manag. 2004:17(2): 177-193.
    · Dvir D, Lechler T. Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Res Policy. 2004:33(1): 1-15.
    · Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H. Open r&d and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Manage. 2009:39(4): 311-316.
    · Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H. Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
    · Faraj S, Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manage Sci. 2000:46(12): 1554-1568.
    · Fernald LW, Solomon GT, Tarabishy A. A new paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership. South Bus Rev. 2005:30(2): 1-10.
    · Fernandez S, Cho YJ, Perry JL. Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. Leadership Quart. 2010:21(2): 308-323.
    · Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J Marketing Res. 1981:18(3): 382-388.
    · Friedrich TL, Vessey WB, Schuelke MJ, Ruark GA, Mumford MD. A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. Leadership Quart. 2009:20(6): 933-958.
    · Fry LW. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quart. 2003:14(6): 693-727.
    · Glisson C, James LR. The cross‐level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. J Organ Behav. 2002:23(6): 767-794.
    · Goleman D. Leadership that gets results (harvard business review classics). Harvard Business Press.
    · Gottschalk P, Terje Karlsen J. A comparison of leadership roles in internal it projects versus outsourcing projects. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2005:105(9): 1137-1149.
    · Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quart. 1995:6(2): 219-247.
    · Hackman J. The design of work teams. Inj. W. Lorsch (ed.), handbook of organizational behavior. englewood cliffs, nj: prentice-hall.
    · Hanisch B, Wald A. A project management research framework integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors. Proj Manag J. 2011:42(3): 4-22.
    · Hansen A, Byrne Z, Kiersch C. How interpersonal leadership relates to employee engagement. J Manage Psychol. 2014:29(8): 953-972.
    · Hartog DN, Muijen JJ, Koopman PL. Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the mlq. J Occup Organ Psych. 1997:70(1): 19-34.
    · Hayfield F. Basic factors for a successful project. In. Basic factors for a successful project. 6th Internet Congress; Garmisch-Partenkirchen FRG; 1979.
    · Hidle K, Normann RH. Who can govern? Comparing network governance leadership in two norwegian city regions. Eur Plan Stud. 2013:21(2): 115-130.
    · Hirst G, Mann L. A model of r&d leadership and team communication: The relationship with project performance. R&D Manage. 2004:34(2): 147-160.
    · Hoch JE. Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. J Bus Psychol. 2013:28(2): 159-174.
    · Hoch JE, Bommer WH, Dulebohn JH, Wu D. Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. J Manage. 2018:44(2): 501-529.
    · Hocking R, Pendleton O. The regression dilemma. Commun Stat Theory. 1983:12(5): 497-527.
    · Hoegl M, Ernst H, Proserpio L. How teamwork matters more as team member dispersion increases. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2007:24(2): 156-165.
    · Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci. 2001:12(4): 435-449.
    · Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam r&d projects: A longitudinal study. Organ Sci. 2004:15(1): 38-55.
    · Hollmann V, Lee H, Zo H, Ciganek AP. Examining success factors of open source software repositories: The case of osor. Eu portal. Int J Bus Inform Syst. 2013:14(1): 1-20.
    · Hooijberg R, Choi J. The impact of organizational characteristics on leadership effectiveness models: An examination of leadership in a private and a public sector organization. Admin Soc. 2001:33(4): 403-431.
    · Hsu JS-C, Shih S-P, Chiang JC, Liu JY-C. The impact of transactive memory systems on is development teams' coordination, communication, and performance. Int J Proj Manag. 2012:30(3): 329-340.
    · Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ Sci. 2006:17(1): 45-63.
    · Keller RT. Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. J Appl Psychol. 2006:91(1): 202.
    · Koohang A, Hatch M. Leadership effectiveness in it-centered organizations: Gender and levels of management. J Comput Inform Syst. 2017:57(4): 385-391.
    · Koohang A, Paliszkiewicz J, Goluchowski J. The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: A research model. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2017:117(3): 521-537.
    · Korzaan M, Erskine M. The influence of goal orientation, goal commitment, and implementation mindset on project success. In. The influence of goal orientation, goal commitment, and implementation mindset on project success. Americas Conference On Information Systems; New Orleans; 2018.
    · Krahn J, Hartment F. Effective project leadership: A combination of project manager skills and competencies in context. In. Effective project leadership: A combination of project manager skills and competencies in context. Biennial meeting of the Project Management Institute Research Conference, Montreal, Canada; 2006.
    · Kuthyola KF, Liu JY-C, Klein G. Influence of task interdependence on teamwork quality and project performance. In. Influence of task interdependence on teamwork quality and project performance. International Conference on Business Information Systems: Springer; 2017.
    · Lee FL, Chan JM. Digital media use and participation leadership in social protests: The case of tiananmen commemoration in hong kong. Telemat Inform. 2015:32(4): 879-889.
    · Müller R, Turner JR. Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. Int J Proj Manag. 2007:25(1): 21-32.
    · Müller R, Turner R. The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. Eur Manag J. 2007:25(4): 298-309.
    · Maqbool R, Sudong Y, Manzoor N, Rashid Y. The impact of emotional intelligence, project managers’ competencies, and transformational leadership on project success: An empirical perspective. Proj Manag J. 2017:48(3): 58-75.
    · Markus ML, Christiaanse E. Adoption and impact of collaboration electronic marketplaces. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag. 2003:1(2): 139-155.
    · Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage. 2008:34(3): 410-476.
    · Mayer DM, Aquino K, Greenbaum RL, Kuenzi M. Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Acad Manage J. 2012:55(1): 151-171.
    · McGuire M, Agranoff R. The limitations of public management networks. Public Admin. 2011:89(2): 265-284.
    · Mehra A, Smith BR, Dixon AL, Robertson B. Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quart. 2006:17(3): 232-245.
    · Mohrman SA, Cohen SG, Morhman Jr AM. Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. Jossey-Bass.
    · Mumford MD, Friedrich TL, Vessey WB, Ruark GA. Collective leadership: Thinking about issues vis-à-vis others. Ind Organ Psychol-Us. 2012:5(4): 408-411.
    · Mumford MD, Strange JM. Vision and mental models: The case of charismatic and ideological leadership. In. Vision and mental models: The case of charismatic and ideological leadership. Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead 10th anniversary edition: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2013.
    · Oz E, Sosik JJ. Why information systems projects are abandoned: A leadership and communication theory and exploratory study. J Comput Inform Syst. 2000:41(1): 66-78.
    · Papke-Shields KE, Boyer-Wright KM. Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. Int J Proj Manag. 2017:35(2): 169-179.
    · Piening EP. Dynamic capabilities in public organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Public Manag Rev. 2013:15(2): 209-245.
    · Pinto JK, Prescott JE. Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. J Manage. 1988:14(1): 5-18.
    · Pinto MB, Pinto JK. Project team communication and cross‐functional cooperation in new program development. J Prod Innovat Manag. 1990:7(3): 200-212.
    · Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003:88(5): 879-903.
    · Qin L, Hsu J, Stern M. Evaluating the usage of cloud-based collaboration services through teamwork. J Educ Bus. 2016:91(4): 227-235.
    · Renko M, El Tarabishy A, Carsrud AL, Brännback M. Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. J Small Bus Manage. 2015:53(1): 54-74.
    · Ricard LM, Klijn EH, Lewis JM, Ysa T. Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: A comparison of copenhagen, rotterdam and barcelona. Public Manag Rev. 2017:19(2): 134-156.
    · Richardson HA, Vandenberg RJ. Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work‐unit level model of employee involvement. J Organ Behav. 2005:26(5): 561-589.
    · Saafein O, Shaykhian GA. Factors affecting virtual team performance in telecommunication support environment. Telemat Inform. 2014:31(3): 459-462.
    · Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Hum Factors. 2008:50(3): 540-547.
    · Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Ringle CM. Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (pls) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In. Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (pls) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. Measurement and research methods in international marketing: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2011.
    · Standing C, Guilfoyle A, Lin C, Love PE. The attribution of success and failure in it projects. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2006:106(8): 1148-1165.
    · Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. Am Psychol. 1990:45(2): 120-133.
    · Swiercz PM, Lydon SR. Entrepreneurial leadership in high-tech firms: A field study. Leadership Org Dev J. 2002:23(7): 380-389.
    · Thite M. Leadership styles in information technology projects. Int J Proj Manag. 2000:18(4): 235-241.
    · Tummers LG, Knies E. Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Admin Rev. 2013:73(6): 859-868.
    · Van Dierendonck D. Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. J Manage. 2011:37(4): 1228-1261.
    · Van Wart M. Leadership in public organizations: An introduction. Routledge.
    · Van Wart M, Roman A, Wang X, Liu C. Integrating ict adoption issues into (e-) leadership theory. Telemat Inform. 2017:34(5): 527-537.
    · Walumbwa FO, Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Wernsing TS, Peterson SJ. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. J Manage. 2008:34(1): 89-126.
    · Wart MV. Public‐sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Admin Rev. 2003:63(2): 214-228.
    · Yammarino FJ, Salas E, Serban A, Shirreffs K, Shuffler ML. Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Ind Organ Psychol-Us. 2012:5(4): 382-402.
    · Yang L-R, Huang C-F, Wu K-S. The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success. Int J Proj Manag. 2011:29(3): 258-267.
  • 자료후기

      Ai 리뷰
      지식판매자의 콘텐츠는 다양한 주제를 깊이 있게 다루고 있어 지루할 틈이 없습니다. 매번 새로운 인사이트를 제공해 주어 학습이 즐거워지고 있습니다. 학습 후 실제로 과제나 레포트에 활용할 수 있어 매우 만족스럽습니다. 앞으로도 계속해서 이용할 예정입니다!
    • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

      해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

      꼭 알아주세요

      • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
        자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
        저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
      • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
        파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
        파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

    찾으시던 자료가 아닌가요?

    지금 보는 자료와 연관되어 있어요!
    왼쪽 화살표
    오른쪽 화살표
    문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
    안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
    저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
    - 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
    - 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
    - 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
    이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
    - 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
    - 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
    - 작별인사 독후감
    • 전문가요청 배너
    • EasyAI 무료체험
    해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
    챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
    2025년 11월 01일 토요일
    AI 챗봇
    안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
    9:49 오후