이란에 대한 과거 유엔제제안을 통해 바라본 유엔의 새로운 대북안보리제제안에 대한 평가(영문)

소개

지난 3월에 유엔안보리에서 통과된 대북제제안에 대한 기존의 이란에 대한 유엔안보리 제제와의 비교한 내용입니다. 첫번째 파트에서는 이번 대북제제안(UNSC R2270)에 대한 주요내용, 두번째 파트에서는 이란에 대하여 가장 강력한 제제안이었던 UNSC R1929와의 비교, 그리고 마지막 파트에서는 본 결의안이 통과되기까지의 중국외교부와 러시아외교부의 입장을 그들의 공식자리에서의 장관코멘트, 대변인 성명발표 등에서 자료를 발췌하여 다루었습니다.

현재 고려대(안암)에서 국제안보를 전공으로 석사과정 중에 있으며 본 페이퍼는 제가 이수하고 있는 과목에서 파이널 텀페이퍼로 제출한 것입니다. 역대 가장 강력한 대북제제안으로는 평가를 받고 있지만 어떤 점에서 어디가 그렇게 강력하다고 평가받는지 기존에 핵무장화로 나아가던 이란을 굴복시킨 유엔안보리 제제안과 비교한 내용으로 흔치 않지만 아주 중요한 이슈를 다루었습니다.

목차

Ⅰ. UNSC Resolution 2270; Terminating Resolution for DPRK Nuke?

Ⅱ. Introduction

Ⅲ. Main 1) Significant Contents and Expected Implication of UNSC Resolution 2270 - Table 1: Main Contents of UNSC Resolution 2270 and previous UNSC Resolution 2094

Ⅳ. Main 2) The Differences between UNSC Resolution 1929 and UNSC Resolution 2270
1. Table 2: Main Contents of UNSC Resolution 1929
2. Table 3: Major Comparison between UNSC Resolution 1929 and UNSC Resolution 2270

Ⅴ. Main 3) Positions of Chinese government and Russian government upon UNSC Resolution 2270

Ⅵ. Conclusion

Ⅶ. Bibliography(Harvard styled reference)

본문내용

It has been already 16 years since Pyongyang claimed to the international society that it possessed nuclear weapon. During this time period, international society has been struggling to lead DPRK to renounce their nuclear program with an approach of the carrot and the stick. Not only using the carrot such as providing the light-water nuclear reactor and valuable resources in which DPRK leadership wanted, international society especially initiated by the United States and ROK also firmly switched DPRK by imposing the international sanctions through the UNSC or unilateral sanctions. Nevertheless, DPRK leadership has been flauntingly proceeding their nuclear program, and even recently carried out their 4th nuclear test on last 6 of January under the name of hydrogen bomb according to DPRK’s official statement. International society immediately defined it as a serious provocation to the international peace, and responded to make a stronger version of sanction under UNSC, though there had been still differences in the point of view between UNSC members.

참고자료

· Andrea, B 2016, ‘The new UNSC Sanctions Resolution on North Korea: A Deep Dive Assessment’, 38 North, viewed 27 May 2016, http://38north.org/2016/03/aberger030216/
· Lisa, C 2016, ‘Critical Questions: What Does New Sanctions Legislation on North Korea Mean?’ CSIS, viewed 29 May 2016, https://www.csis.org/analysis/critical-questions-what-does-new-sanctions-legislation-north-korea-mean
· Council on Foreign Relations 2010, ‘UN Security Council Resolution 1929, Iran’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.cfr.org/iran/un-security-council-resolution-1929-iran/p22433
· Embassy of the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Philippines 2016, ‘Press Release’, viewed 25 May 2016, http://embassy_philippines.mofa.go.kr/english/as/embassy_philippines/main/index.jsp
· Bonnie, G 2016, ‘China's Reaction to North Korea's Nuclear Test’, CSIS, viewed 29 May 2016, https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-reaction-north-koreas-nuclear-test
· Wang, H 2016, ‘Iran talks have set a good example for response to DPRK’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/2016-01/13/content_23070985.htm
· International Atomic Energy Agency 2010, ‘Resolution 1929(2010)’, viewed 27 May 2016, https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/unsc_res1929-2010.pdf
· Korean Energy Economics Institute 2016, ‘UNSC Resolution 2270 and Its Effect on Energy Supply-Demand’, viewed 26 May 2016, viewed 28 May 2016, http://www.keei.re.kr/keei/download/WEMI1611.pdf
· U.S. Department of State, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, viewed 28 May 2016, http://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/iran/jcpoa/
· United Nations 2016, ‘Resolution 2270(2016)’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_2016_214.pdf
· United Nations 2016, ‘Letter dated 4 March 2016 from the Permanent Representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_2016_214.pdf
· United States Mission to the United Nations 2016, ‘Remarks by Ambassador Samantha Power, Ambassador Motohide Yoshikawa, and Ambassador Oh Joon, at the Security Council Stakeout Following the Adoption of Resolution 2270 on DPRK Sanctions’, viewed 28 May 2016, http://usun.state.gov/remarks/7164
· Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea, ‘ROK Government Statement on the Adoption of a UN Security Council Resolution on North Korea’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.mofa.go.kr/webmodule/htsboard/template/read/engreadboard.jsp?typeID=12&boardid=302&seqno=316247&c=TITLE&t=&pagenum=17&tableName=TYPE_ENGLISH&pc=&dc=&wc=&lu=&vu=&iu=&du=
· Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2016, ‘Briefing by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova, March 2, 2016’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/spokesman/briefings/-/asset_publisher/D2wHaWMCU6Od/content/id/2124246
· Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2016, ‘Comment by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova on the DPRK’s announcement of a hydrogen bomb test’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2004721/pop_up?_101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw_viewMode=print&_101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw_qrIndex=0
· Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2016, ‘Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying's Regular Press Conference on January 6, 2016’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://kotakinabalu.chineseconsulate.org/eng/wjbfyrth_4/t1329999.htm
· Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2016, ‘Wang Yi Gives Exclusive Interview to Reuters on Syrian Issue and Korean Peninsula Nuclear Issue’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1340523.shtml
· Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2016, ‘Wang Yi Holds Telephone Talks with Foreign Minister Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov of Russia’, viewed 27 May 2016, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1340372.shtml
· Jonathan, P 2016, ‘Learning its lesson? What the Iran deal should teach China about sanctioning North Korea’, Brookings Institution, viewed 28 May 2016, http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2016/02/11-iran-deal-lessons-china-north-korea-pollack
· Paul, P & Katharine M 2016, ‘Are sanctions enough to deal with North Korea?’ Brookings Institution, viewed 28 May 2016, http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2016/03/02-north-korea-sanctions-china-park-moon