[비교행정론]한국과 중국의 비교행정(Comparison of China and South Korea)영문

소개

Ⅰ. Introduction

The comparative administration means an aggregate of actual data which verifies an administrative theory that is applied in the various cultures. Namely, It finds theory which could be applied universally in each other different cultural context.
From process of cold war system of the United States and the Soviet Union, the United states has started an economic aid in the developing countries for preventing the expansion of communism. But these countries` administrative ability was so low that the aid effect couldn`t appear enough. Consequently, it researched the administrative problem of the developing nation in link of technical aid provision.
In the Second World War or so, the conventional theory was that in compliance with an Institutional approach mainly, it was researched the administrative laws and constructions from the western nations. However this research has lacked the rational and scientific standard, and Institutional researches from the western nations have had limitation applying to the developing countries.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction p.2

Ⅱ. Chinese Communist Party p.3

III. Legislation, Jurisdiction, Administration and policy decision process of china p.7

Ⅳ. Bureaucracy of China p.12

Ⅴ. Public Administration Reform in China p.13

Ⅵ. Civil Service in China p.15

Ⅶ. The Local Administration of China p.19

Ⅷ. The Comparison between China and South Korea p.22

Ⅸ. Conclusion p.25

본문내용

Ⅰ. Introduction

The comparative administration means an aggregate of actual data which verifies an administrative theory that is applied in the various cultures. Namely, It finds theory which could be applied universally in each other different cultural context.
From process of cold war system of the United States and the Soviet Union, the United states has started an economic aid in the developing countries for preventing the expansion of communism. But these countries` administrative ability was so low that the aid effect couldn`t appear enough. Consequently, it researched the administrative problem of the developing nation in link of technical aid provision.
In the Second World War or so, the conventional theory was that in compliance with an Institutional approach mainly, it was researched the administrative laws and constructions from the western nations. However this research has lacked the rational and scientific standard, and Institutional researches from the western nations have had limitation applying to the developing countries.
Therefore, in each other different cultural background, the comparative administration was research for finding an administrative theory which is general and raising a scientific merit of public administration.
The ideological system of bureaucracy was formed with contribution of Max Weber, various scholastic researches after that it led and it advanced. In history of the Orient, especially, China and Korea has had form the system of bureaucracy that was composed with infatuation.
From historical viewpoint, Korea and China had similar constructions of politics and administration. In China, the dynasty of centralization setup is formed early and it composed these people who are excellent scholastically of a bureaucracy. Korea had the relation which is close with China at geography, and used an imitated system of advanced bureaucracy and study from china.
From the age of the Three States, Korea accommodated the civilization of China, 3성 6부 system of China had effected from the age of the Three States and the Joseon Dynasty period. Especially, Joseon Dynasty adopted Confucianism and neo-Confucianism, so the bureaucracy group which the liegemen compose took charge of a national administration and a political section.

참고자료

· 김광웅. 김성남, 『비교행정론』, 박영사, 2004
· 박천오, 『비교행정』, 법문사, 2005
· 서진영, 『21세기 중국정치』, 폴리테이아, 2008
· 고영근, 『현대중국정치론』, 부산외국어대학교 출판부, 2007
· 김윤권, 「중국 중앙정부 변화의 실증분석과 그 함의」, 한국행정학보 제40권 제1호(2006봄), 2006
· ZUO RAN, 『the administrative reform in chinese central government in 1990s.』, 한국행정학회 Source 한국행정학회 1995년도 추계국제학술대회 발표논문집 , 1995
· 김흥규, 「중국의 정책 결정과 민주집중제」, 한국국제정치학회 Journal 국제정치논총 Source 제44집 1호, 2004
· 김윤권, 「중국 중앙행정부의 행정기능과 행정기구 및 그 변화」, 한국행정학보 Source 제39권 제1호, 2005.3
· 이대희, 「20세기 중국 행정의 특징」, 서울행정학회 Journal 한국사회와 행정연구 Source 제9권 제2호, 1998.12