<중화문명탐원의 신화학 연구>와 비물질문화유산 ― 윈난성 이족의 ‘지룽(祭竜)’을 중심으로 (“Mythological Research on the Origins of Chinese Civilization” & Chinese Cultural Heritage : Focusing on the Dragon Festival of the Yunnan Province Yi Nationality)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중국어문학연구회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국어문학논집 / 111호 / 293 ~ 316페이지
· 저자명 : 나상진

초록

“Mythological Research on Origins of Chinese Civilization”, progressed focusing on Ye Shuxian adopted ‘the Method of Four Ways Evidences’ and it includes every part of ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’. It seems the same context that China made progress in the examination and selection of ‘National Intangible Cultural Heritage List’ in earnest. The inside term of ‘National Intangible Cultural Heritage’ by China has China’s own context and this brings doubt about China’s directivity to find intangible cultural heritages. The intangible cultural heritage list recently pronunced is especially connected with the minority articles rather than Han tribe and Chinese definition and context of ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’ shows the intention of ‘One China’ to embrace the minority. The minority intangible cultural heritage includes myths and rituals and it could make the king Sung’s genealogy started from Hangdi(Yellow Emperor) and Yandi(Yan Emperor). It brings some questions about using ‘the Method of Four Ways Evidences’ because it could be a method to extend the ancient history part and to combine the concept, ‘Multi Ethnic Unity’. The another question is that the method could be used for the concept of ‘One China’ using the minority usages.
This thesis will introduce, based on these questions above, what the ‘Ji-Long’ which is represented the Yi nationality in southwestern of China is and the myths. Then I will examine how the concept of ‘One China’ is connected with “Mythological Research” in its strategy.

영어초록

“Mythological Research on Origins of Chinese Civilization”, progressed focusing on Ye Shuxian adopted ‘the Method of Four Ways Evidences’ and it includes every part of ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’. It seems the same context that China made progress in the examination and selection of ‘National Intangible Cultural Heritage List’ in earnest. The inside term of ‘National Intangible Cultural Heritage’ by China has China’s own context and this brings doubt about China’s directivity to find intangible cultural heritages. The intangible cultural heritage list recently pronunced is especially connected with the minority articles rather than Han tribe and Chinese definition and context of ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’ shows the intention of ‘One China’ to embrace the minority. The minority intangible cultural heritage includes myths and rituals and it could make the king Sung’s genealogy started from Hangdi(Yellow Emperor) and Yandi(Yan Emperor). It brings some questions about using ‘the Method of Four Ways Evidences’ because it could be a method to extend the ancient history part and to combine the concept, ‘Multi Ethnic Unity’. The another question is that the method could be used for the concept of ‘One China’ using the minority usages.
This thesis will introduce, based on these questions above, what the ‘Ji-Long’ which is represented the Yi nationality in southwestern of China is and the myths. Then I will examine how the concept of ‘One China’ is connected with “Mythological Research” in its strategy.

참고자료

· 없음