탈영토화하는 공간에서 ‘다문화공생’ : 중국 칭다오의 월경하는 사람들 (‘Multicultural Co-Existence’ in the Deterritorializing Space - People Crossing the Border in Qingdao, China -)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국해양대학교 국제해양문제연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 해항도시문화교섭학 / 2호 / 71 ~ 102페이지
· 저자명 : 구지영

초록

As a way to cope with changes resulted from globalization and remove ethnic conflicts, ‘multiculturalism/multicultural co-existence has become the issue since the 1990s. This is one of ethic and educational methods to respect diversity and uniqueness of personal culture, and also coexist in the relations between minority that has long existed in a nation-state and immigration that has generated by globalization since the late 1990s. However, this saying itself is a ‘good concept’ without any doubt to raise opposition but has a different meaning depending on when and where it is used.
With the urgent request for 'social integration' with rapidly increasing numerous ‘others’ due to globalization, current ‘multicultural co-existence’ is used as a political alternative of political and social issues that a nation-state faces. The ‘multicultural co-existence’ of this political aspect faces some criticisms of the discourse’s inconsequence unlike the original ‘good intention’.
Is ‘multicultural co-existence’ a concept that should be discarded due to its logical contradiction? Is the original ‘good intention’ of respecting diversity and of symbiosis(公利共生) possible to practice? This study aims to look into ‘multicultural co-existence’ from the epistemological perspective by having the problem awareness and discussing as follows. First, based on the fieldwork data in Qingdao, China, the study overviews ‘new’ immigration generated by globalization and their created space to cross the boarder. Second, after introducing the relation with ‘others’ in everyday life through cases, it aims to point out paradox and limits of ‘multicultural co-existence’ from the ‘social integration’. Third, as one of epistemological changes to realize ‘multicultural co-existence’, it aims to discuss the usefulness of ‘cultural interactions’ focused on the individual’s cultural identity. Modernity itself becomes today questioned as the deterritorializing space expands, and it is expected that constant meeting between ‘self’ and ‘non-self’ caused by 'globalization from below' becomes free from fixed boundaries and is connected to be the new ethic of symbiosis.

영어초록

As a way to cope with changes resulted from globalization and remove ethnic conflicts, ‘multiculturalism/multicultural co-existence has become the issue since the 1990s. This is one of ethic and educational methods to respect diversity and uniqueness of personal culture, and also coexist in the relations between minority that has long existed in a nation-state and immigration that has generated by globalization since the late 1990s. However, this saying itself is a ‘good concept’ without any doubt to raise opposition but has a different meaning depending on when and where it is used.
With the urgent request for 'social integration' with rapidly increasing numerous ‘others’ due to globalization, current ‘multicultural co-existence’ is used as a political alternative of political and social issues that a nation-state faces. The ‘multicultural co-existence’ of this political aspect faces some criticisms of the discourse’s inconsequence unlike the original ‘good intention’.
Is ‘multicultural co-existence’ a concept that should be discarded due to its logical contradiction? Is the original ‘good intention’ of respecting diversity and of symbiosis(公利共生) possible to practice? This study aims to look into ‘multicultural co-existence’ from the epistemological perspective by having the problem awareness and discussing as follows. First, based on the fieldwork data in Qingdao, China, the study overviews ‘new’ immigration generated by globalization and their created space to cross the boarder. Second, after introducing the relation with ‘others’ in everyday life through cases, it aims to point out paradox and limits of ‘multicultural co-existence’ from the ‘social integration’. Third, as one of epistemological changes to realize ‘multicultural co-existence’, it aims to discuss the usefulness of ‘cultural interactions’ focused on the individual’s cultural identity. Modernity itself becomes today questioned as the deterritorializing space expands, and it is expected that constant meeting between ‘self’ and ‘non-self’ caused by 'globalization from below' becomes free from fixed boundaries and is connected to be the new ethic of symbiosis.

참고자료

· 없음