친사회 행동과 관련 변인에 대한 메타 분석: 한국과 중국 비교 연구 (A Study on the Meta-Analysis on Relationship between Prosocial Behavior and Related Factors: Comparative Analysis in Korea and China)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 동북아시아문화학회
· 수록지 정보 : 동북아 문화연구 / 1권 / 55호 / 281 ~ 296페이지
· 저자명 : 허균

초록

A Study on the Meta-Analysis on Relationship between Prosocial Behavior and Related Factors: Comparative Analysis in Korea and China Heo, Gyun The purpose of this study was to synthesize and compare the relationship between prosocial behavior and related factors(empathy, self-characteristics, support, and participation activities) both in Korea and China. We collected articles and thesis paper published from 2000 to 2017 both in Korea and China. We used databases RISS(Research Information Sharing Service) for Korean and CNKI(China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for Chinese articles. We also gathered from the Web of Science and Scopus for the China data. We used meta-analysis for synthesizing and compare both in Korea and China. From the data, we could code 130 effect sizes from the researches of Korea and China, and analyzed each related factors.
Followings are the results of this study: (a) All effect sizes of the relationship between prosocial behavior and related factors were significant both Korea and China. The orders of effect sizes in Korea are empathy, support, participation activities, and self-characteristics.
Those in China are empathy, support, self-characteristics, and participation activities. (b) Both in Korea and China, the mean effect size of the relationship between prosocial behavior and empathy are commonly very high significantly. In the criteria of Hedges’s g, the effect size is .906 in Korea and .985 in China, but there is no significant difference between Korea and China. (c) There is a significant difference in the mean effect size of the relation prosocial behavior with support factors between Korea and China. There is bigger effect size of Korea(.823) than that of China(.552). The subcategory of support, there is the significant difference in attachment and social support.
These findings can be applied to develop the prosocial behavior educational program and to implement comparative studies to more countries including Northeast Asia.

영어초록

A Study on the Meta-Analysis on Relationship between Prosocial Behavior and Related Factors: Comparative Analysis in Korea and China Heo, Gyun The purpose of this study was to synthesize and compare the relationship between prosocial behavior and related factors(empathy, self-characteristics, support, and participation activities) both in Korea and China. We collected articles and thesis paper published from 2000 to 2017 both in Korea and China. We used databases RISS(Research Information Sharing Service) for Korean and CNKI(China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for Chinese articles. We also gathered from the Web of Science and Scopus for the China data. We used meta-analysis for synthesizing and compare both in Korea and China. From the data, we could code 130 effect sizes from the researches of Korea and China, and analyzed each related factors.
Followings are the results of this study: (a) All effect sizes of the relationship between prosocial behavior and related factors were significant both Korea and China. The orders of effect sizes in Korea are empathy, support, participation activities, and self-characteristics.
Those in China are empathy, support, self-characteristics, and participation activities. (b) Both in Korea and China, the mean effect size of the relationship between prosocial behavior and empathy are commonly very high significantly. In the criteria of Hedges’s g, the effect size is .906 in Korea and .985 in China, but there is no significant difference between Korea and China. (c) There is a significant difference in the mean effect size of the relation prosocial behavior with support factors between Korea and China. There is bigger effect size of Korea(.823) than that of China(.552). The subcategory of support, there is the significant difference in attachment and social support.
These findings can be applied to develop the prosocial behavior educational program and to implement comparative studies to more countries including Northeast Asia.

참고자료

· 없음