2015 응급의학과 전문의 총조사 최종보고서 (Final Report of 2015 Korean Emergency Physician Survey (KEPS))

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대한응급의학회
· 수록지 정보 : 대한응급의학회지 / 27권 / 5호 / 1 ~ 24페이지
· 저자명 : 이형민, 조광현, 양혁준, 김인병, 이기중, 한승백, 오세현, 김 철, 박준석, 강영준, 박현경, 박유석, 강구현, 조한진, 조영순, 박준범, 정진우, 박경혜, 최대해, 정시영, 박주옥, 이동욱, 손재돈, 김주영

초록

The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM) in celebration of its 20 years took upon itself to survey its members on how they are faring in their workplaces, in 2010. The survey was called 2010 Korean Emergency Physician Survey (KEPS). 2010 KEPS was the first survey of its kind conducted by KSEM. The results were striking in that it revealed overburdened Emergency Physicians (EP) working in less than ideal conditions and dissatisfied as a whole. But these results only went as far as reflecting the state of emergency medicine (EM) in Korea in the eyes of KSEM members, and not enough effort was put into finding the causes or in improving the state of EM. In turn, KSEM members were dismayed with the use of survey results. The purpose of 2015 KEPS was to find out the changes in current state of EP, which were little or no changes. The results will be analyzed and prioritized to resolve any policy and well-being issues by providing meaningful and effective resolution plans. If given the choice to reselect the EM specialty dropped. Clearly the results won’t improve unless EP ourselves take the initiative. The 2015 survey team devoted themselves in seeing the bigger picture for the future of EM. They agreed in order to secure a continuous advancement in EM it is imperative to improve the satisfaction and respect of the EP before anything else. The results of the survey must serve to improve working conditions and longevity of EP.

영어초록

The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM) in celebration of its 20 years took upon itself to survey its members on how they are faring in their workplaces, in 2010. The survey was called 2010 Korean Emergency Physician Survey (KEPS). 2010 KEPS was the first survey of its kind conducted by KSEM. The results were striking in that it revealed overburdened Emergency Physicians (EP) working in less than ideal conditions and dissatisfied as a whole. But these results only went as far as reflecting the state of emergency medicine (EM) in Korea in the eyes of KSEM members, and not enough effort was put into finding the causes or in improving the state of EM. In turn, KSEM members were dismayed with the use of survey results. The purpose of 2015 KEPS was to find out the changes in current state of EP, which were little or no changes. The results will be analyzed and prioritized to resolve any policy and well-being issues by providing meaningful and effective resolution plans. If given the choice to reselect the EM specialty dropped. Clearly the results won’t improve unless EP ourselves take the initiative. The 2015 survey team devoted themselves in seeing the bigger picture for the future of EM. They agreed in order to secure a continuous advancement in EM it is imperative to improve the satisfaction and respect of the EP before anything else. The results of the survey must serve to improve working conditions and longevity of EP.

참고자료

· 없음