참예술가 노릇하기 :〈농군〉, 그 문학적 글쓰기 (To perform the duties of a true artist : A Farmer, its literary writing)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 동아인문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 동아인문학 / 13호 / 1 ~ 34페이지
· 저자명 : 盧相來

초록

Lee Tae-Jun's A Farmer is a faithful report on what Manchuria is like as a public memory which can not be hidden. A Farmer, with a demonstration against the distorted lives of Chosun people by imperialist Japan, sublimates a space of Manchuria in art, not presenting Manchuria as a supply center for a literature in line with a national policy. Owing to this value, Kim Nam-Cheon evaluates that the world of A Farmer is faithful.
A Farmer is not made in a day suddenly. The fact that it is created in a series of motivations as a momentum can be confirmed in his works, It's time to make a resolution to perform the duties of a true artist, Observing an emigrant's village. The latter work is a travel work which shows objectively that the former work is a work going beyond the characteristics of national policy literature. In this travel work, the realistic sense which Lee Tae-Jun finds out in historical field is contained. What Lee Tae-Jun sees with his own eyes during the travel over the emigrant's village is not a rosy Manchuria as the Royal Paradise(王道樂土), but 'humble' lives of the others who were slanted through the modern and pushed to an extreme situation. The space in which the lives spread is considered as a space of misunderstanding resulting in the cultural difference. It is never described as a space dominated by a dichotomous thought, civilization vs barbarity. Such his historical sense is linked to his determination, To perform the duties of a true artist. Therefore, he can create A Farmer.
A Farmer shows excellently how the instinctual desire for life by people who were pushed to an extreme situation can bind the individuals into one, rather than reveals the collective nationalism. On account of this quality, Some devaluate this work as a work of revealing the collective nationalism, but it is proper that this quality is a fellowmanship which is made by common condition of life. This fellowmanship is not relevant to an image of colonist which imperialist Japan aggravated. That is to say, by representing the painful lives of the others rather than describing Five Peoples in Harmony, the Royal Paradise which the national policy literature presented as a symbol, it performs a role faithfully as a brilliant public record.

영어초록

Lee Tae-Jun's A Farmer is a faithful report on what Manchuria is like as a public memory which can not be hidden. A Farmer, with a demonstration against the distorted lives of Chosun people by imperialist Japan, sublimates a space of Manchuria in art, not presenting Manchuria as a supply center for a literature in line with a national policy. Owing to this value, Kim Nam-Cheon evaluates that the world of A Farmer is faithful.
A Farmer is not made in a day suddenly. The fact that it is created in a series of motivations as a momentum can be confirmed in his works, It's time to make a resolution to perform the duties of a true artist, Observing an emigrant's village. The latter work is a travel work which shows objectively that the former work is a work going beyond the characteristics of national policy literature. In this travel work, the realistic sense which Lee Tae-Jun finds out in historical field is contained. What Lee Tae-Jun sees with his own eyes during the travel over the emigrant's village is not a rosy Manchuria as the Royal Paradise(王道樂土), but 'humble' lives of the others who were slanted through the modern and pushed to an extreme situation. The space in which the lives spread is considered as a space of misunderstanding resulting in the cultural difference. It is never described as a space dominated by a dichotomous thought, civilization vs barbarity. Such his historical sense is linked to his determination, To perform the duties of a true artist. Therefore, he can create A Farmer.
A Farmer shows excellently how the instinctual desire for life by people who were pushed to an extreme situation can bind the individuals into one, rather than reveals the collective nationalism. On account of this quality, Some devaluate this work as a work of revealing the collective nationalism, but it is proper that this quality is a fellowmanship which is made by common condition of life. This fellowmanship is not relevant to an image of colonist which imperialist Japan aggravated. That is to say, by representing the painful lives of the others rather than describing Five Peoples in Harmony, the Royal Paradise which the national policy literature presented as a symbol, it performs a role faithfully as a brilliant public record.

참고자료

· 없음