‘식민지 아카데미즘’의 그늘, 지식인의 전향 (The Shadow of Colonial Academism：Conversion of Korean Intellectuals)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 국제한국문학문화학회
· 수록지 정보 : 사이間SAI / 11호 / 93 ~ 134페이지
· 저자명 : 홍종욱

초록

Korean studies, which began in the early 1930s, marked a starting point for an independent academism that attempted to transcend the imitation of Japanese and Western academism, taking instead as its object of study Korean history and social. reality as its object of study. The development of Marxist analysis of Korean society, along with the interest in history and cultural tradition, was based on the unified understanding of national and class issues, which formed the ground of the worldwide trend of the Anti-Fascist People’s Front.
The Korean-led colleges played a defined role as academic centers in colonial Korea. However, it is difficult to see them as stable institutions for academic reproduction. Korean graduates of Keijo Imperial University also exemplified the situation in which colonial intellectuals were put. To understand this situation in colonial Korea. in which academic activities were unstable and even the use of language was restricted, not as the lack of academism but as colonial academism is to highlight the imperial constraint of modern academism.
After the breakout of the Sino-Japanese War, Japanese intellectuals began to participate in constructing the total war system with a hope of a “wartime transformation.” To the contrary, in order to turn to the total war system, Korean intellectuals were required to come up with a theory suitable to the national question. There existed limited sources of the logic of conversion available to the colonial intellectuals. The logic of conversion can largely be summarized as twofold：the control economy theory and the theory of the national harmony. These theories succeeded the “scientific Korean studies” in distorted ways, in the sense that they had strong concern about the national and class questions.

영어초록

Korean studies, which began in the early 1930s, marked a starting point for an independent academism that attempted to transcend the imitation of Japanese and Western academism, taking instead as its object of study Korean history and social. reality as its object of study. The development of Marxist analysis of Korean society, along with the interest in history and cultural tradition, was based on the unified understanding of national and class issues, which formed the ground of the worldwide trend of the Anti-Fascist People’s Front.
The Korean-led colleges played a defined role as academic centers in colonial Korea. However, it is difficult to see them as stable institutions for academic reproduction. Korean graduates of Keijo Imperial University also exemplified the situation in which colonial intellectuals were put. To understand this situation in colonial Korea. in which academic activities were unstable and even the use of language was restricted, not as the lack of academism but as colonial academism is to highlight the imperial constraint of modern academism.
After the breakout of the Sino-Japanese War, Japanese intellectuals began to participate in constructing the total war system with a hope of a “wartime transformation.” To the contrary, in order to turn to the total war system, Korean intellectuals were required to come up with a theory suitable to the national question. There existed limited sources of the logic of conversion available to the colonial intellectuals. The logic of conversion can largely be summarized as twofold：the control economy theory and the theory of the national harmony. These theories succeeded the “scientific Korean studies” in distorted ways, in the sense that they had strong concern about the national and class questions.

참고자료

· 없음